SavedAdd your journal

Journals / European Journal of Biology / 2019 / Cilt: 78 - Sayı: 2

CRISPR-Cas: Removing Boundaries of the Nature

Özlem AKKAYA
Ali Burak YILDIZ
Yelda ÖZDEN ÇİFTÇİ
Nicat CEBRAİLOĞLU
Pages
153–160
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, this review provides a brief history of gene editing tools together with the overview of the latest applications, regulations and ethical/structural aspects of the CRISPR Cas system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The CRISPR-Cas 9 system, which is known as a natural way of bacteria to defend against phage infection and plasmid transfer, has been re-purposed as a RNA-guided DNA targeting strategy for genome editing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Together with the advances gained in DNA sequencing technology, this platform opened a new era in molecular biology since its recognition was specified by 20-nt single-guide RNA which made technique easier, efficient and simple for application in any organism.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, this review provides a brief history of gene editing tools together with the overview of the latest applications, regulations and ethical/structural aspects of the CRISPR Cas system.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The CRISPR-Cas 9 system, which is known as a natural way of bacteria to defend against phage infection and plasmid transfer, has been re-purposed as a RNA-guided DNA targeting strategy for genome editing. Together with the advances gained in DNA sequencing technology, this platform opened a new era in molecular biology since its recognition was specified by 20-nt single-guide RNA which made technique easier, efficient and simple for application in any organism. Thus, many studies have discussed and performed the applications of CRISPR-Cas systems on different organisms for genome editing. Moreover, targeted gene regulations, epigenetic modulation, chromatin imaging and manipulation could also be applied with this system. Besides all its potential promising aspects, this tool might have some side effects like off-target mutations. In addition, unexpected results have also been reported after some gene editing applications. Thus, this review provides a brief history of gene editing tools together with the overview of the latest applications, regulations and ethical/structural aspects of the CRISPR Cas system.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKKAYA, Ö., YILDIZ, A. B., ÇİFTÇİ, Y. Ö., CEBRAİLOĞLU, N. (2022). CRISPR-Cas: Removing Boundaries of the Nature. European Journal of Biology, Cilt: 78 - Sayı: 2, 153–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/510604

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Adli M. The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond. Nat Commun 2018; 9(1): 1911
  2. Capecchi MR. Altering the genome by homologous recombination. Sci 1989; 244(4910): 1288-92
  3. Lin FL, Sperle K, Sternberg N. Recombination in mouse L cells between DNA introduced into cells and homologous chromosomal sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985; 82: 1391–95
  4. Klug A, Rhodes D. ‘Zinc fingers’: a novel protein motif for nucleic acid recognition. Trends Biochem Sci 1987; 12: 464-69
  5. Kim YG, Cha J, Chandrasegaran S. Hybrid restriction enzymes: zinc finger fusions to Fok I cleavage domain. PNAS 1996; 93(3): 1156- 60
  6. Urnov FD, Miller JC, Lee YL, Beausejour CM, Rock JM, Augustus S, et al. Highly efficient endogenous human gene correction using designed zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 2005; 435(7042): 646
  7. Christian M, Cermak T, Doyle EL, Schmidt C, Zhang F, Hummel A, Targeting DNA double-strand breaks with TAL effector nucleases. Genetics 2010; 186(2): 757-761
  8. Doudna JA, Charpentier E, The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Sci 2014; 346(6213): 1258096
  9. Hsu PD, Lander ES, Zhang F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell 2014; 157(6), 1262-78
  10. Leenay RT, Maksimchuk KR, Slotkowski RA, Agrawal RN, Gomaa AA, Briner AE, Barrangou R, Beisel CL. Identifying and visualizing functional PAM diversity across CRISPR-Cas systems. Mol Cell 2016, 62(1): 137-47
  11. Liu JJ, Orlova N, Oakes BL, Ma E, Spinner HB, Baney KL, Al-Shayeb B. CasX enzymes comprise a distinct family of RNA-guided genome editors. Nature 2019; 566(7743): 218
  12. Harrington LB, Burstein D, Chen JS, Paez-Espino D, Ma E, Witte IP, Doudna JA. Programmed DNA destruction by miniature CRISPRCas14 enzymes. Sci 2018; 362(6416): 839-42
  13. Li SY, Cheng QX, Liu JK, Nie XQ, Zhao GP, Wang J. CRISPR-Cas12a has both cis-and trans-cleavage activities on single-stranded DNA. Cell Res 2018; 28(4): 491
  14. Komor AC, Kim YB, Packer MS, Zuris JA, Liu DR. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without doublestranded DNA cleavage. Nature 2016; 533:420–24
  15. Gaudelli NM, Komor AC, Rees HA, Packer MS, Badran AH, Bryson DI, Liu DR. Programmable base editing of A*T to G*C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature 2017; 551:464–71
  16. Maeder ML, Linder SJ, Cascio VM, Fu Y, Ho QH, Joung JK. CRISPR RNA–guided activation of endogenous human genes. Nat Methods 2013; 10(10): 977
  17. Gilbert LA, Larson MH, Morsut L, Liu Z, Brar GA, Torres SE,