Journals / Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of 10 th Grade Mathematics Curriculum of General Secondary Education Institutions

Genel Ortaöğretim Kurumlarının 10. Sınıf Matematik Programının Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
832–864
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Theresults indicated that although the existing program was planned as learner centered,the implementation process revealed that teachers maintained their traditional rolesand teacher-centered methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 10 th grade mathematics curriculum ofGeneral Secondary Education Institutions through the perceptions of mathematicsteachers, students, and classroom observations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participants of this study were 136 students and 8 mathematics teachers cho-sen through convenient sampling strategy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Theresults indicated that although the existing program was planned as learner centered,the implementation process revealed that teachers maintained their traditional rolesand teacher-centered methods.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 10 th grade mathematics curriculum ofGeneral Secondary Education Institutions through the perceptions of mathematicsteachers, students, and classroom observations. In this study, mixed method designand Malcolm Provus’ Discrepancy Evaluation Model was utilized. Data were col-lected through questionnaire, semi-structured interview schedule and observationform. Participants of this study were 136 students and 8 mathematics teachers cho-sen through convenient sampling strategy. The quantitative data were analyzed byusing SPSS 22.0 and qualitative data were analyzed through content analysis. Theresults indicated that although the existing program was planned as learner centered,the implementation process revealed that teachers maintained their traditional rolesand teacher-centered methods. There was a discrepancy between the curriculum andimplementation process. In order to improve the implementation stage of the curric-ulum, it can be suggested that in-service training programs about different teachinglearning and assessment strategies can be provided, the cooperation between teach-ers, parents and schools can be strengthened, and finally, teachers can be providedwith necessary teaching materials.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı Genel Ortaöğretim Kurumlarının 10. sınıf matematik programını öğretmen-öğrenci görüşlerine ve sınıf gözlemlerine dayalı olarak değerlendirmektir. Çalışmada, Malcolm Provus’un Farklar Yaklaşımı ile Program Değerlendirme Modeli kullanılmıştır. Veriler anket, yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme ve gözlem formları ile toplanmıştır. Çalışmaya dahil edilen 136 öğrenci ve 8 matematik öğretmeni uygun örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilmiştir. Nicel veriler SPSS 22.0 programı kullanılarak analiz edilirken nitel veriler içerik analizi yoluyla incelenmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, matematik programının öğrenen merkezli olarak planlanmasına rağmen uygulama sürecinde öğretmenlerin geleneksel rollerini sürdürdükleri ve öğretmen merkezli yöntemler kullanmaya devam ettikleri belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, planlanan programla uygulamadaki program arasında farklar olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Programın daha etkili uygulanabilmesi için öğretmenlere farklı öğretim ve değerlendirme yöntemleri ile ilgili hizmet- içi eğitim verilmesi; öğretmen, veli ve okul işbirliğinin sağlanması ve son olarak da gerekli araç- gereç ve materyal sağlanması önerilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZÜDOĞRU, M. (2022). Evaluation of 10 th Grade Mathematics Curriculum of General Secondary Education Institutions. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 832–864. https://ajindex.com/articles/505146

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Acar, H. (2007). The assessment of the new primary education programmes according to the teachers’ opinions. Unpublished Masters’s Thesis. Osmangazi University, Eskişehir. Aközbek, A. (2008). The evaluation of 9th grade mathematics curriculum via the opinions of teachers and students by using cipp model. Unpublished Masters’s Thesis. Yıldız Teknik University, İstanbul.
  2. Aksu, H. (2008). Teachers’ opinions of the new primary mathematics programme. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Education 8 (1), 1-10.
  3. Anılan, H. & Sarıer, Y. (2008). The opinions of the sixth grade mathematics teachers’about applicatiblity of mathematics curriculum. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, 8 (16), 128-141.
  4. Arseven, A., Kontaş, H. & Arseven, İ. (2014). The opinions of primary school teachers’ concerning the component of evaluation of mathematics curriculum. Journal of Adıyaman University Social Sciences Institute, 7 (18), 657-677.
  5. Artut, P. D. & Aslan, E. (2014). İlköğretim Matematik Dersi Öğretim Programında Yer Alan Tahmin Becerisinin Öğretmen Görüşleri Doğrultusunda Değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Çukurova University, Social Sciences Institute, 23 (1), 239-250.
  6. Aslan, E. (2011). Evaluating of estimation skill of the elementary school fifth grade mathematics course program in terms of teachers’ views. Unpublished Masters’s Thesis, Çukurova University, Adana. Avcu, T. & Yenilmez, K. (2011). Evaluation of the seventh grade mathematics curriculum based on teachers’ opinions. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy 6 (1), 1-19.
  7. Bal, P. (2008). The evaluation of new mathematic curriculum in term of teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Çukurova University, Social Sciences Institute 17 (1), 53-68.
  8. Berk, Ş. (2012). Evaluation of modular system implemented in vocational and technical secondary schools by using provus’ discrepancy model. Unpublished Dissertation. Anadolu University, Eskişehir. Bulut, A. (2006). 9th grade mathematics teachers' opinion on 2005 mathematics curriculum's evaluation dimension. Unpublised Masters’s Thesis. Yıldız Technical University, İstanbul.
  9. Bulut, İ. (2008). Teacher views on student-centered practices in the new primary education curriculum. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 56, 521-546.
  10. Creswell J. W. (2007).
  11. Educational Research Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (3. Baskı). Merrill Prentice Hall. Cet, S. (2000). Evaluation of lyce 1 mathematics curriculum in secondary education. Unpublished M