SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

The Investigation of Teacher Candidates’ Learning Approaches and Engagement in a Hybrid Learning Environment According to RASE Model

Hibrit Bir Öğrenme Ortamında Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğrenme Yaklaşımları ve Katılımlarının RASE Modeline Göre İncelenmesi

Melike Özüdoğru
Pages
358–377
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It can be concluded that the learning environment is important for learning outcomes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to investigate whether teacher candidates’ learning approaches and engagement levels predicted their achievement in the Curriculum Development course in a hybrid course in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, data were collected from 129 teacher candidates through the ‘Learning Approaches Questionnaire’ and ‘Engagement Questionnaire’.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It can be concluded that the learning environment is important for learning outcomes.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate whether teacher candidates’ learning approaches and engagement levels predicted their achievement in the Curriculum Development course in a hybrid course in Turkey. This study was designed according to the RASE (Resources/Activity/Support/Evaluation) model. In this study, data were collected from 129 teacher candidates through the ‘Learning Approaches Questionnaire’ and ‘Engagement Questionnaire’. The achievement scores of teacher candidates were obtained at the end of the semester according to their course grades. To answer the research question, the Multiple Linear Regression analysis was employed. The results of the study showed that while the deep learning approach of teacher candidates was significantly and positively related to engagement variables, the surface learning approach was related to engagement variables negatively. However, it was revealed that the surface learning approaches and behavioral engagement of teacher candidates significantly predicted the achievement in the hybrid Curriculum Development course. It can be concluded that the learning environment is important for learning outcomes. It can be suggested that besides providing different active learning opportunities, teacher candidates should be assessed by the level of applications conducted in the hybrid learning course to improve deep learning and all types of engagement levels.

Özet

Bu çalışma, öğretmen adaylarının öğrenme yaklaşımlarının ve katılım düzeylerinin Türkiye'de hibrit olarak tasarlanan Eğitimde Program Geliştirme dersindeki başarılarını yordayıp yordamadığını araştırmayı amaçlamıştır. Bu çalışma RASE (Kaynaklar/Etkinlik/Destek/Değerlendirme) modeline göre tasarlanmıştır ve 129 öğretmen adayından 'Öğrenme Yaklaşımları Ölçeği” ve “Katılım Ölçeği” aracılığıyla veriler toplanmıştır. Öğretmen adaylarının başarı puanları ders notlarına göre yarıyıl sonunda alınmıştır. Araştırma sorusunu yanıtlamak için Çoklu Doğrusal Regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçları, öğretmen adaylarının derin öğrenme yaklaşımının katılım değişkenleri ile anlamlı ve pozitif yönde ilişkili, yüzeysel öğrenme yaklaşımının katılım değişkenleri ile negatif yönde ilişkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Ancak öğretmen adaylarının yüzeysel öğrenme yaklaşımları ve davranışsal katılımlarının Eğitimde Program Geliştirme dersindeki başarıyı önemli ölçüde yordadığı ortaya çıkmıştır. Öğrenme ortamının öğrenme çıktıları için önemli olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Öğretmen adaylarına farklı aktif öğrenme fırsatları sağlamanın yanı sıra, derin öğrenmeyi ve her türlü katılım düzeylerini geliştirmek için hibrit derslerde yapılan uygulamalar ile değerlendirme önerilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özüdoğru, M. (2022). The Investigation of Teacher Candidates’ Learning Approaches and Engagement in a Hybrid Learning Environment According to RASE Model. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 358–377. https://ajindex.com/articles/462066

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227-236. https://orcid.org/ 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006 Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology in higher education: A systematic review in the field of arts and humanities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 126-150. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5477
  2. Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://orcid.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
  3. Ben-Eliyahu, A., Moore, D., Dorph, R., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). Investigating the multidimensionality of engagement: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement across science activities and contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 87-105. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.002 Biggs, J. (1991). Approaches to learning in secondary and tertiary students in Hong Kong: Some comparative studies. Educational Research Journal, 6, 27–39.
  4. Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ- 2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133–149.
  5. Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university. (3th ed.). Berkshire: Open University Press.
  6. Bowden, J. L-H., Tickle, L., & Naumann, K. (2019). The four pillars of tertiary student engagement and success: A holistic measurement approach. Studies in Higher Education, 1– 18. https://orcid.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672647
  7. Buckley, C. A., Pitt, E., Norton, B., & Owens, T. (2010). Students’ approaches to study, conceptions of learning and judgements about the value of networked technologies. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(1), 55–65. https://orcid.org/10.1177/1469787409355875
  8. Cheng, G., & Chau, J. (2014). Exploring the relationships between learning styles, online participation, learning achievement and course satisfaction: An empirical study of a blended learning course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 257-278. https://orcid.org/10.1111/bjet.12243
  9. Churchill, D., King, M., Webster, B., & Fox, B. (2013). Integrating learning design, interactivity, and technolog