SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2026

Improving Reading Comprehension in Children with ASD: Technology-Mediated Anaphoric Reference Support

Otizm Spektrum Bozukluğu Olan Çocuklarda Okuma Anlamayı Geliştirme: Teknoloji Destekli Anafirik Referans Desteği

Seda Karayazı Özsayın(ADIYAMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2445-5371
Ann Cranston-Gingras(University of South Florida)0009-0001-4261-5340
Pages
1–10
Publication Date
2026-10-21
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings extend prior research on anaphoric reference instruction for students with ASD and offer preliminary support for computer-based anaphoric supports as a feasible, low-intensity reading intervention, while highlighting the need for further research on maintenance and generalization of gains.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigated the effects of a technology-mediated anaphoric reference intervention, which combined computer-based visual cues with researcher-delivered verbal prompting, on the reading comprehension of four children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Across visual analysis, effect-size indices (PND, PEM, PAND), and multilevel modeling, all four participants showed statistically significant gains in reading comprehension during the intervention phase.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings extend prior research on anaphoric reference instruction for students with ASD and offer preliminary support for computer-based anaphoric supports as a feasible, low-intensity reading intervention, while highlighting the need for further research on maintenance and generalization of gains.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:otizm · okuma · anlama

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of a technology-mediated anaphoric reference intervention, which combined computer-based visual cues with researcher-delivered verbal prompting, on the reading comprehension of four children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Using a randomized multiple-baseline single-case design with a follow-up extension, students' responses to comprehension questions were analyzed across baseline, intervention, and follow-up phases, and standardized pre- and post-intervention reading assessments were administered. Across visual analysis, effect-size indices (PND, PEM, PAND), and multilevel modeling, all four participants showed statistically significant gains in reading comprehension during the intervention phase. However, these gains were not uniformly maintained after support was withdrawn. The average follow-up effect was not statistically significant, and the outcomes varied across participants. Students' perceptions of the intervention were generally positive. These findings extend prior research on anaphoric reference instruction for students with ASD and offer preliminary support for computer-based anaphoric supports as a feasible, low-intensity reading intervention, while highlighting the need for further research on maintenance and generalization of gains.

Özet

Bu çalışma, bilgisayar tabanlı görsel ipuçlarını araştırmacı tarafından sunulan sözel yönlendirmeyle birleştiren teknoloji aracılı bir anaforik referans müdahalesinin, Otizm Spektrum Bozukluğu (OSB) tanılı dört çocuğun okuduğunu anlama becerileri üzerindeki etkilerini incelemiştir. İzleme uzantılı, randomize çoklu başlangıç düzeyi tek-denekli deseni kullanılarak, öğrencilerin anlama sorularına verdikleri yanıtlar başlangıç düzeyi (baseline), müdahale ve izleme aşamaları boyunca analiz edilmiş, ayrıca müdahale öncesi ve sonrasında standartlaştırılmış okuma değerlendirmeleri uygulanmıştır. Görsel analiz, etki büyüklüğü indeksleri (PND, PEM, PAND) ve çok düzeyli modelleme yoluyla, dört katılımcının tamamı müdahale aşamasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı okuduğunu anlama kazanımları göstermiştir. Ancak bu kazanımlar, destek kaldırıldıktan sonra tüm katılımcılarda aynı düzeyde korunmamıştır: ortalama izleme etkisi istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmamış ve sonuçlar katılımcılar arasında farklılaşmıştır. Öğrencilerin müdahaleye ilişkin algıları genel olarak olumlu olmuştur. Bu bulgular, OSB'li öğrencilere yönelik anaforik referans öğretimi üzerine yapılan önceki araştırmaları genişletmekte; bilgisayar tabanlı anaforik desteklerin uygulanabilir, düşük yoğunluklu bir okuma müdahalesi olabileceğine dair ön bulgular sunmakta ve kazanımların kalıcılığı ile genellenebilirliğine ilişkin ileri araştırma ihtiyacını vurgulamaktadır. Anahtar sözcük: otizm, okuma, anlama, anaforik zamir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özsayın, S. K., Cranston-Gingras, A. (2026). Improving Reading Comprehension in Children with ASD: Technology-Mediated Anaphoric Reference Support. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2026, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.2014124

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (74)

  1. Agbayewa, A. S. (2011). Verbal irony comprehension for children and adolescents with high-functioning autism and Asperger's syndrome in computer-mediated communication. University of Manitoba (Canada). https://bit.ly/49C6gYH
  2. Arciuli, J., Stevens, K., Trembath, D., & Simpson, I. C. (2013). The relationship between parent report of adaptive behavior and direct assessment of reading ability in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(6), 1837-1844. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0034
  3. Armstrong, T. K. (2009). A computer assisted repeated reading intervention with children with high functioning autism. University of Illinois at Chicago. https://bit.ly/4plntuk
  4. Armstrong, T. K., & Hughes, M. T. (2012). Exploring computer and storybook interventions for children with high functioning autism. International Journal of Special Education, 27(3), 88-99. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1001062.pdf
  5. Åsberg Johnels, J., Fernell, E., Kjellmer, L., Gillberg, C., & Norrelgen, F. (2022). Language/cognitive predictors of literacy skills in 12-year-old children on the autism spectrum. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 47(3), 166-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2021.1884897
  6. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?. Cognition, 21(1), 37-46. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8.
  7. Beckerson, M., Paisley, C., Murdaugh, D., Holm, H., Lemelman, A., Spencer, A.,. & Kana, R. (2024). Reading comprehension improvement in autism. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15, 1292018. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1292018.
  8. Begeer, S., Gevers, C., Clifford, P., Verhoeve, M., Kat, K., Hoddenbach, E., & Boer, F. (2011). Theory of mind training in children with autism: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(8), 997-1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1121-9
  9. Begeer, S., Malle, B. F., Nieuwland, M. S., & Keysar, B. (2010). Using theory of mind to represent and take part in social interactions: Comparing individuals with high-functioning autism and typically developing controls. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7(1), 104-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405620903024263
  10. Byom, L. J., & Mutlu, B. (2013). Theory of mind: Mechanisms, methods, and new directions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 413.https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00413
  11. Campbell, M. A. (2010). Effects of pronoun identification instruction on text comprehension for children with autism (Doctoral dissertation, Fairleigh Dickinson University). https://bit.ly/3L0dVH4
  12. Carnahan, C. & Williamson, P. S. (Eds.). (2010). Quality literacy instruction for students with autism spectrum disorders. AAPC Textbooks, a division of AAPC.
  13. Carnahan, C. R., & Williamson, P. S. (2013). Does compare-contrast text structure help students with autism spectrum disorder comprehend science text?. Exceptional Children, 79(3), 347-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291307900302
  14. Chan, M. M., Chan, M. C., Yeung, M. K., Wang, S. M., Liu, D., & Han, Y. M. (2022). Aberrant prefrontal functional connectivity during verbal fluency test is associated with reading comprehension deficits in autism spectrum disorder: An f NIRS study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 984777. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.984777
  15. Cole, A. M., Chan, E. S., Gaye, F., Spiegel, J. A., Soto, E. F., & Kofler, M. J. (2023). Evaluating the simple view of reading for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(5), 700. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000806
  16. Cotter, J. A. (2011). Reading comprehension strategies in children with high-functioning autism: A social constructivist perspective. University of Alaska Fairbanks. https://bit.ly/49dYRgY
  17. Davidson, M. M., & Ellis Weismer, S. (2014). Characterization and prediction of early reading abilities in children on the autism spectrum. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(4), 828-845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1936-2
  18. Davidson, M. M., Kaushanskaya, M., & Ellis Weismer, S. (2018). Reading comprehension in children with and without ASD: The role of word reading, oral language, and working memory. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(10), 3524-3541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3617-7
  19. Elleman, A. M., Steacy, L. M., Gilbert, J. K., Cho, E., Miller, A. C., Coyne-Green, A.,. & Compton, D. L. (2022). Exploring the role of knowledge in predicting reading and listening comprehension in fifth grade students. Learning and Individual Differences, 98, 102182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102182
  20. Engel, K. S., & Ehri, L. C. (2021). Reading comprehension instruction for young students with autism: forming contextual connections. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51(4), 1266-1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04596-z
  21. Fajardo, I., Pérez, A. I., Ferrer, A., Pérez-Fuster, P., & García-Blanco, A. C. (2022). Anaphor processing during reading comprehension in students with autism spectrum disorder. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 38(6), 505-525. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1982430
  22. Ferron, J. M., Bell, B. A., Hess, M. R., Rendina-Gobioff, G., & Hibbard, S. T. (2009). Making treatment effect inferences from multiple-baseline data: The utility of multilevel modeling approaches. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 372-384. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.372
  23. Ferron, J., & Jones, P. K. (2006). Tests for the visual analysis of response-guided multiple-baseline data. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(1), 66-81. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.75.1.66-81
  24. Ferron, J., & Scott, H. (2005). Multiple baseline designs. In B. Everitt & D. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of behavioral statistics (Vol. 3, pp. 1306–1309). Wiley.
  25. Finnegan, E., & Mazin, A. L. (2016). Strategies for increasing reading comprehension skills in students with autism spectrum disorder: A review of the literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 39(2), 187-219. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2016.0007
  26. Flores, M. M., & Ganz, J. B. (2007). Effectiveness of direct instruction for teaching statement inference, use of facts, and analogies to students with developmental disabilities and reading delays. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22(4), 244-251. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576070220040601
  27. Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2017). Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex, 86, 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.023
  28. Frith, U., & Happé, F. (1994). Autism: Beyond “theory of mind”. Cognition, 50(1-3), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90024-8
  29. Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  30. Gira, K. (2010). Understanding and Facilitating Reading Comprehension in Children with Autism. Illinois Reading Council Journal, 38(2). https://bit.ly/3LbrNhG
  31. Grigorenko, E. L., Klin, A., Pauls, D. L., Senft, R., Hooper, C., & Volkmar, F. (2002). A descriptive study of hyperlexia in a clinically referred sample of children with developmental delays. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017995805511
  32. Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1). doi: 10.1007/s10803-005-0039-0.
  33. Happé, F. G., & Booth, R. D. (2008). The power of the positive: Revisiting weak coherence in autism spectrum disorders. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(1), 50-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701508731
  34. Jolliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). A test of central coherence theory: Linguistic processing in high-functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome: Is local coherence impaired? Cognition, 71(2), 149–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00022-0
  35. Karayazi Ozsayin, S. (2017). Improving reading comprehension of children with ASD: Implication of anaphoric reference support with computer programming. [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida]. Digital Commons @ University of South Florida. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/7043
  36. Kimhi, Y., Mirsky, Y., & Bauminger-Zviely, N. (2025). The role of theory of mind, executive functions, and central coherence in reading comprehension for children with ASD and typical development. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 55(4), 1302-1317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06272-y
  37. Knight, V. F., Wood, C. L., Spooner, F., Browder, D. M., & O’Brien, C. P. (2015). An exploratory study using science e Texts with students with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 30(2), 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357614559214
  38. Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. What works clearinghouse. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED510743.pdf
  39. Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J. H., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512452794
  40. Kratochwill, T. R., & Levin, J. R. (2014). Introduction: An overview of single-case intervention research. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case intervention research: Methodological and statistical advances (pp. 3–23). American Psychological Association.
  41. Kurzeja, O., Flynn, S., Grindle, C. F., Sutherland, D., & Hastings, R. P. (2024). Teaching Reading Skills to Individuals with Autism and/or Intellectual Disabilities Using Computer-Assisted Instruction: a Systematic Review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-024-00465-y
  42. Lezak, M. D. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press, USA.
  43. Li, Q., Li, Y., Liu, B., Chen, Q., Xing, X., Xu, G., & Yang, W. (2022). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children and adolescents in the United States from 2019 to 2020. JAMA pediatrics, 176(9), 943-945. https://doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.1846
  44. Liu, Y., Tian, X., Mao, H., Cheng, L., Wang, P., & Gao, Y. (2024). Research on pragmatic impairment in autistic children during the past two decades (2001–2022): hot spots and frontiersbased on Cite Space bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1276001. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1276001
  45. Lord, C., Elsabbagh, M., Baird, G., & Veenstra-Vanderweele, J. (2018). Autism spectrum disorder. The Lancet, 392(10146), 508-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31129-2
  46. Lucas, R., & Norbury, C. F. (2014). Levels of text comprehension in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD): The influence of language phenotype. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(11), 2756-2768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2133-7
  47. Mao, S. Y., Chiu, H. M., Yu, Y. T., & Chen, K. L. (2023). The associations of theory of mind with both general and theory-of-mind-related social interaction in children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 102, 102107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2023.102107
  48. Micai, M., Vulchanova, M., & Saldaña, D. (2021). Reading goals and executive function in Autism: An eye‐tracking study. Autism Research, 14(5), 1007-1024. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2447
  49. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49-100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
  50. Nagano, M., Zane, E., & Grossman, R. B. (2021). Structural and contextual cues in third-person pronoun interpretation by children with autism spectrum disorder and their neurotypical peers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51(5), 1562-1583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04645-7
  51. National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). Children 3 to 21 years old served under Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Part B, by type of disability: Selected school years, 1976–77 through 2022–23 (Table 204.30). U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d23/tables/dt23_204.30.asp
  52. Norbury, C., & Nation, K. (2011). Understanding variability in reading comprehension in adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: Interactions with language status and decoding skill. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(3), 191-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888431003623553
  53. Norbury, C. F., & Bishop, D. V. (2002). Inferential processing and story recall in children with communication problems: a comparison of specific language impairment, pragmatic language impairment and high‐functioning autism. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 37(3), 227-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820210136269
  54. O'Connor, I. M., & Klein, P. D. (2004). Exploration of strategies for facilitating the reading comprehension of high-functioning students with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000022603.44077.6b
  55. Oakhill, J., & Yuill, N. (1986). Pronoun resolution in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders: Effects of memory load and inferential complexity. Language and Speech, 29(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098602900104
  56. Ostrolenk, A., Courchesne, V., & Mottron, L. (2023). A longitudinal study on language acquisition in monozygotic twins concordant for autism and hyperlexia. Brain and Cognition, 173, 106099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2023.106099
  57. Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The Acquisition of Reading Comprehension Skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227–247). Blackwell Publishing. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1002/9780470757642.ch13
  58. Peristeri, E., Frantzidis, C. A., & Andreou, M. (2024). Reading comprehension differences between children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and low cognitive abilities and children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and intact cognitive skills: the roles of decoding, fluency and morphosyntax. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1357590. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1357590.
  59. Polónyiová, K., Kruyt, J., & Ostatníková, D. (2024). To the roots of theory of mind deficits in autism spectrum disorder: A narrative review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-024-00457-y
  60. Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515-526. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00076512.
  61. Randi, J., Newman, T., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2010). Teaching children with autism to read for meaning: Challenges and possibilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(7), 890-902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-0938-6
  62. Ricketts, J., Jones, C. R., Happé, F., & Charman, T. (2013). Reading comprehension in autism spectrum disorders: The role of oral language and social functioning. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(4), 807-816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1619-4
  63. Shadish, W. R., Kyse, E. N., & Rindskopf, D. M. (2013). Analyzing data from single-case designs using multilevel models: new applications and some agenda items for future research. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 385. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0032964
  64. Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1998). Summarizing single-subject research: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification, 22(3), 221-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455980223001
  65. Skuse, D., Greaves-Lord, K., Rodrigues da Cunha, G., & Baird, G. (2024). Autism spectrum disorder. In G. M. Reed, P. L. -J. Ritchie, A. Maercker, & T. J. Rebello (Eds.), A psychological approach to diagnosis: Using the ICD-11 as a framework (pp. 61–77). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000392-004
  66. Solazzo, S., Kojovic, N., Robain, F., & Schaer, M. (2021). Measuring the emergence of specific abilities in young children with autism spectrum disorders: the example of early hyperlexic traits. Brain Sciences, 11(6), 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11060692
  67. Solis, M., El Zein, F., Vaughn, S., Mc Culley, L. V., & Falcomata, T. S. (2016). Reading comprehension interventions for students with autism spectrum disorders: An alternating treatments comparison. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 31(4), 284-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615583464
  68. Tárraga-Mínguez, R., Gómez-Marí, I., & Sanz-Cervera, P. (2020). Interventions for improving reading comprehension in children with ASD: A systematic review. Behavioral Sciences, 11(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11010003
  69. Tjus, T., Heimann, M., & Nelson, K. E. (1998). Gains in literacy through the use of a specially developed multimedia computer strategy: Positive findings from 13 children with autism. Autism, 2(2), 139-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361398022003
  70. Wei, X., Christiano, E. R., Yu, J. W., Wagner, M., & Spiker, D. (2015). Reading and math achievement profiles and longitudinal growth trajectories of children with an autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 19(2), 200-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361313516549
  71. Westby, C., & Robinson, L. (2014). A developmental perspective for promoting theory of mind. Topics in Language Disorders, 34(4), 362-382. doi: 10.1097/TLD.0000000000000035.
  72. Improving Reading Comprehension in Children with ASD: Technology-Mediated Anaphoric Reference Support.
  73. Beckerson, M., Paisley, C., Murdaugh, D., Holm, H., Lemelman, A., Spencer, A.,. & Kana, R. (2024). Reading comprehension improvement in autism. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15, 1292018. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1292018.
  74. Elleman, A. M., Steacy, L. M., Gilbert, J. K., Cho, E., Miller, A. C., Coyne-Green, A.,. & Compton, D. L. (2022). Exploring the role of knowledge in predicting reading and listening comprehension in fifth grade students. Learning and Individual Differences, 98, 102182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102182