Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 32

Amartya Sen's capability approach

Amartya Sen'in kapasite yaklaşımı

Pages
258–280
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this view, the success of a society is to be evaluated primarily by substantive capability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Capability approach that this work tries to examine outlines the limitations of classic welfarist viewpoint in evaluating social alternatives.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Capability approach concentrates particularly on the roles and interconnections between certain crucial instrumental freedoms, including economic opportunities, political freedoms, social facilities, transparency guaranties, and protective security.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this view, the success of a society is to be evaluated primarily by substantive capability.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Capability approach that this work tries to examine outlines the limitations of classic welfarist viewpoint in evaluating social alternatives. The freedom of agency that we individually have is inescapably qualified and constrained by social, political and economic opportunities that are available to us. Capability approach concentrates particularly on the roles and interconnections between certain crucial instrumental freedoms, including economic opportunities, political freedoms, social facilities, transparency guaranties, and protective security. However, a person’s capability refers to the alternative combinations of functionings that are feasible for her to achieve. In this view, the success of a society is to be evaluated primarily by substantive capability.

Özet

Bu çalışmada incelenen kapasite yaklaşımı, sosyal alternatiflerin değerlendirilmesinde klasik refahçı kısıtlamalara dikkat çekmektedir. Ekonomik karar birimleri olarak sahip olduğumuz eylem özgürlüğü, bize sağlanan toplumsal, siyasal ve iktisadi fırsatlar tarafından kaçınılmaz biçimde sınırlanır ve kısıtlanır. Kapasite yaklaşımı, özellikle iktisadi fırsatlar, siyasal özgürlükler, toplumsal imkânlar, şeffaflık güvenceleri ve koruyucu güvenliğini kapsayan bazı önemli araçsal özgürlükler arasındaki roller ve bağlantılar üzerinde yoğunlaşır. Diğer taraftan bir kişinin kapasitesi, o kişinin başarması mümkün olan alternatif işlev bileşimlerini ifade eder. Bu bakış açısından bir toplumun başarısı esas olarak temel kapasitelere göre değerlendirilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEKER, F. (2022). Amartya Sen's capability approach. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 32, 258–280. https://ajindex.com/articles/503598

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. ALEXANDER, John M.; (2008),
  2. Capabilities and Social Justice, Ashgate Publishing, England, ss. 187. ARROW, Kenneth J.; (1995), “A Note on Freedom and Flexibility”, iç. Kaushik BASU, Prasanta K. PATTANAIK ve Kotaro SUZUMURA (Ed.), Choice, Welfare and Development, Clarendon Pres, Oxford, ss.7-16.
  3. ATKINSON, Anthhony B.; (1995), “Capabilities, Exclusion, and the Supply of Goods”, iç. Kaushik BASU, Prasanta K. PATTANAIK ve Kotaro SUZUMURA (Ed.), Choice, Welfare and Development, Clarendon Pres, Oxford, ss.17-31.
  4. BARRY, Norman; (2003),
  5. Modern Siyaset Teorisi, Liberte Yayınları, Ankara, 368s. BASU, Kaushik; Prasanta K. PATTANAIK ve Kotaro SUZUMURA; (1995), “Introduction”, iç. Kaushik BASU, Prasanta K. PATTANAIK ve Kotaro SUZUMURA (Ed.), Choice, Welfare and Development, Clarendon Press, Oxford, ss.1-3.
  6. DREZE, Jean ve Mrinalini SARAN; (1995), “Primary Education and Economic Development in China and India: Overview and Two Case Studies”, iç. Kaushik BASU, Prasanta K. PATTANAIK ve Kotaro SUZUMURA (Ed.), Choice, Welfare and Development, Clarendon Pres, Oxford, ss.182-241.
  7. GOULET, Denis; (1997), “Development Ethics: A New Discipline, International Journal of Social Economics, 24(11), ss.1160-171.
  8. İNSEL, Ahmet; (2000), “Özgürlük Etiği Karşısında İktisat Kuramı: Amartya Sen’in Etik İktisat Önerisi”, 4. ODTÜ İktisat Kongresi, İnternet Adresi: www.http://www.deu.edu.tr/userweb/timucin.yalcinkaya/dosyalar/OZ GURLUK%20ETIGI%20KARSISINDA%20IKTISAT%20KURAMI. doc, Erişim Tarihi: 14.05.2008.
  9. KUKLYS, Wiebke; (2005), “Inroduction”, iç. Wiebke KUKLYS (Ed.), Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Applications, Springerlink Verlag, Berlin, ss.9-31.
  10. KUKLYS, Wiebke ve Ingrid ROBEYNS; (2005), “Sen’s Capability Approach to Welfare Economics”, iç. Wiebke KUKLYS (Ed.), Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Applications, Springerlink Verlag, Berlin, ss. 9-31. O’NEILL, John; (2001), Piyasa: Etik, Bilgi ve Politika, Çev. Şen Süer KAYA, Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul, 318s. OSWALD, Andrew J; (1997), “Happiness and Economic Performance”, The Economic Journal, No: 107, ss.1815-1831.
  11. RAWLS, John; (2003), Halkların Yasası: Kamusal Akıl Düşüncesinin Yeniden Ele Alınması, Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul, 212s. SEN, Amartya; (1982),
  12. Choice, Welfare and Measurement, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 336s. SEN, Amartya; (1983), “Development: Which Way Now?” The Economic Journal, 93(372), ss.745-762.
  13. SEN, Amartya; (1985), Commodities and Capabilit