Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 32

Traditional and online word-of-mounth in marketing context: A theoretical framework

Pazarlama bağlamında geleneksel ve internette ağızdan ağıza iletişim: Kuramsal bir çerçeve

Pages
113–134
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For this purpose, a conceptual ‘traditional word-of-mouth model’ and ‘online word-of-mouth model’ have been put forward in marketing context.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In fact, word-of-mouth or verbal communication is a type of communication which the people use frequently, and by which they are influenced in daily life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The effect created by wordof- mouth has become more evident and more important especially after the widespread use of internet.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For this purpose, a conceptual ‘traditional word-of-mouth model’ and ‘online word-of-mouth model’ have been put forward in marketing context.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In fact, word-of-mouth or verbal communication is a type of communication which the people use frequently, and by which they are influenced in daily life. The effect created by wordof- mouth has become more evident and more important especially after the widespread use of internet. All interpersonal communication means, which has gained a new dimension with the close interest of marketers to the topic, have started to be followed closely and wanted to be conducted. In this study, it is aimed that the concepts of ‘traditional word-of-mouth’ and ‘online word-of-mouth’ will be explained, and word-of-mouth will be presented in terms of both traditional means and online means, particularly in marketing context. For this purpose, a conceptual ‘traditional word-of-mouth model’ and ‘online word-of-mouth model’ have been put forward in marketing context.

Özet

Ağızdan ağıza iletişim ya da sözlü/ağızdan iletişim, gerçekte insanların günlük yaşamlarında sıklıkla kullandıkları ve etkiye maruz kaldıkları iletişim şeklidir. Ağızdan ağıza iletişimin yarattığı etki özellikle internet kullanımının yaygınlaşmasıyla birlikte daha belirgin ve önemli hale gelmiştir. Pazarlamacıların konuya yakın ilgi göstermesiyle yeni bir boyut kazanan tüm kişilerarası iletişimler yakından izlenmeye başlamış ve yönlendirilmek istenmiştir. Çalışmada geleneksel ve internette ağızdan ağıza iletişim kavramlarının açıklanması ve özellikle pazarlama bağlamında ağızdan ağıza iletişimin hem geleneksel olarak hem internet boyutuyla ortaya konması amaçlanmaktadır. Bu amaçla pazarlama bağlamında kavramsal bir geleneksel ağızdan ağıza iletişim modeli ve internette ağızdan ağıza iletişim modeli ortaya konulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKAR, E. (2022). Traditional and online word-of-mounth in marketing context: A theoretical framework. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 32, 113–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/503596

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. AHUJA Roshan D.; Tara Anne MICHELS, Mary Mazzei WALKER ve Mike WEISSBUCH; (2007), “Teen Perceptions of Disclosure in Buzz Marketing”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24(3), ss.151–159.
  2. ALLARD, Stéphane; (2006), “Myths and Promises of Buzz Marketing”, Ed. Justin Kirby ve Paul Marsden, Connected Marketing The Viral, Buzz and Word of Mouth Revolution, s. 198, Elsevier Ltd., Burlington, ss.197-207.
  3. ALLSOP, Dee T.; Bryce R. BASSETT, James A. HOSKINS; (2007), “Wordof- Mouth Research: Principles and Applications”, Journal Of Advertising Research, December, ss.398-411. AMBLEE Naveen ve Tung BUI; (2007), “The Impact of Additional Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Sales of Digital Micro-products over Time: A Longitudinal Analysis of Amazon Shorts”,, HICSS, 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Issue, Jan. Page(s): 153b, İnternet Adresi; http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ stamp/stamp.jsp?t p=&arnumber=4076685&isnumber=4076362, Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2008.
  4. BICKART, Barbara ve Robert M. SCHINDLER; (2001), “Internet Forums as Influential Sources of Consumer Information”, Journal of İnteractive Marketing, 15(3)/ Summer, ss.31-40.
  5. BONE, Paula Fitzgerald; (1992), “Determinants of Word-Of-Mouth Communications During Product Consumption”, Advances in Consumer Research, 19, ss.579-583.
  6. BROWN, Jo; Amanda J. BRODERICK ve Nick LEE; (2007), “Word of Mouth Communication within Online Communities: Conceptualizing The Online Social Network”, Journal of interactive marketing, 21(3)/ summer, ss.2-20.
  7. BRUYN, Arnaud De ve Gary L. LILIEN; (2008), “A Multi-stage Model of Word-of-Mouth Influence Through Viral Marketing”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25, ss.151–163.
  8. BUTTLE, Francis A.; (1998), “Word of Mouth: Understanding and Managing Referral Marketing, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 6, ss.241–254.
  9. CARL, Walter J.; (2006), “What's All The Buzz About?: Everyday Communication and the Relational Basis of Word-of-Mouth and Buzz Marketing Practices”, Management Communication Quarterly, 19, ss.601-634.
  10. CARL, Walter J. ve Carey M. NOLAND; (2008), “The Conversational Geography of Word-of-Mouth Communication and Marketing Practice”, Communication Quarterly, 56(2), May, ss.184–207.
  11. CHENG, Simone; Terry LAM ve Cathy H.C. HSU; (2006), “Negative Word-of- Mouth Communication Intention: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior”, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, ss. 95-116.
  12. DAVIS, Alanah ve Deepak KHAZANCHI; (2008) “An Empirical Study of Online Word of M