SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 46

ANALYSIS OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TOURISM INCOME AND ECONOMIC GROWTH BY SYMMETRIC AND ASYMMETRIC CAUSALITY APPROACHES: THE CASE OF TURKEY

TURİZM GELİRLERİ-EKONOMİK BÜYÜME İLİŞKİSİNİN SİMETRİK VE ASİMETRİK NEDENSELLİK YAKLAŞIMI İLE ANALİZİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Ceyhun Can ÖZCAN
Pages
177–199
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings obtained from asymmetric causality analysis also indicate that the direction of causality is from tourism income to economic growth.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ABSTRACT This study tests the relationship between tourism income and economic growth in Turkey by employing linear and non-linear time series causality and asymmetric causality analysis devel- oped by Hatemi-J (2012).
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we employ annual data belonging 1963 2010 time period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings obtained from asymmetric causality analysis also indicate that the direction of causality is from tourism income to economic growth.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study tests the relationship between tourism income and economic growth in Turkey by employing linear and non-linear time series causality and asymmetric causality analysis devel- oped by Hatemi-J (2012). In this study, we employ annual data belonging 1963 2010 time period. Empirical results obtained from symmetric causality analyses imply that there is a linear causation linkage between economic growth and tourism income running from tourism income to economic growth. The findings obtained from asymmetric causality analysis also indicate that the direction of causality is from tourism income to economic growth.

Özet

ÖZ Bu çalışma Türkiyede turizm gelirleri ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişkiyi doğrusal ve doğrusal olmayan zaman serisi nedensellik ve Hatemi-J (2012) tarafından geliştirilen asimetrik nedensellik yöntemi yardımı ile test etmektedir. Çalışmada 1963-2010 yılları arasında döneme ait veri seti kullanılmaktadır. Simetrik nedensellik analizlerinden elde edilen ampirik bulgular değiş- kenler arasında turizm gelirlerinden ekonomik büyümeye doğru doğrusal bir nedenselliğin oldu- ğunu göstermektedir. Asimetrik nedensellik analizinden elde edilen bulgular ise nedenselliğin turizm gelirlerinden ekonomik büyümeye doğru olduğunu teyit etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZCAN, C. C. (2022). ANALYSIS OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TOURISM INCOME AND ECONOMIC GROWTH BY SYMMETRIC AND ASYMMETRIC CAUSALITY APPROACHES: THE CASE OF TURKEY. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 46, 177–199. https://ajindex.com/articles/503517

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. ARSLANTÜRK, Yalçın ve Sibel ATAN; (2012), “Dynamic Relation Between Economic Growth, Foreign Exchange And Tourism Incomes: An Econometric Perspective On Turkey”, Journal of Business, Econo- mics and Finance, 1(1), pp.30-37.
  2. ASLAN, Alper; (2008), “Türkiye’de Ekonomik Büyüme ve Turizm İlişkisi Üze- rine Ekonometrik Analiz”, Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 24(1), ss.1–11. BAHAR, Ozan ve Kurtuluş BOZKURT; (2010), “Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde Turizm-Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Dinamik Panel Veri Analizi”, Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 21(2), ss. 255-265.
  3. BAHAR, Ozan ve Metin KOZAK; (2005), Uluslararası Turizm ve Rekabet Edebilirlik, İkinci Baskı, Ankara:
  4. Detay Yayıncılık. BAHAR, Ozan; (2006), “Turizm Sektörünün Türkiye’nin Ekonomik Büyümesi Üzerindeki Etkisi: VAR Analizi Yaklaşımı”, C.B.Ü. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 13 (2), ss. 137-150.
  5. BALAGUER, Jacint and Manuel CANTAVELLA-JORDÁ; (2002), “Tourism as a Long-run Economic Growth Factor: The Spanish Case”, Applied Economics, 34(7), pp. 877-884.
  6. BANERJEE, Anindya; Juan J. DOLADO and Ricardo MESTRE; (1998), “Er- ror-correction Mechanism Tests for Cointegration in a Single- equation Framework”, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19 (3), pp. 267-283.
  7. BELK, Russell W. and Janeen Arnold COSTA; (1995), “International Tourism: An Assessment and Overview”, Journal of Macromarketing, 15 (2), pp.33-49.
  8. BHAGWATI, Jagdish N. and Thirukodikaval Nilakanta SRINIVASON; (1979), “Trade Policy and Development”, in Dornbusch RUDIGER and Jacob FRENKEL (Ed.), International Economic Policy: Theory and Evi- dence, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 1-35.
  9. BOZKURT, Hilal; (2007),
  10. Zaman Serileri Analizi, İkinci Baskı, Bursa: Ekin Kitabevi.
  11. BREITUNG, Jörg and Bertrand CANDELON; (2006). “Testing For Short And Long-Run Causality: A Frequency Domain Approach”, Journal of Econometrics, 12, pp. 363-378.
  12. BRITTON, Stephen G.; (1982), “The Political Economy of Tourism in the Third World”, Annals of Tourism Research, 9, pp. 331-358.
  13. BRIDA, Juan Gabriel; Wiston Adriàn RISSO and Edgar J. Sanchez CARRERA; (2008), “A Long-Run Equilibrium Demand Function: The Mexican Tourism”, TOURISMOS: An International Multidisciplinary Jo- urnal of Tourism, 3(1), pp. 66-82.
  14. CHAREMZA, Wojciech and Derek F. DEADMAN; (1992), New Directions in Econometric Practice General to Spesific Modelling, Cointegra- tion and Vector Autoregressions, First Edition, London: Edward El- gar Publishing. CHEN, Ching and Song Zan CHIOU-WEI; (2009), “T