Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 52

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GLOBAL COMPETITION: NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION AND SHANGHAI COOPERATION ORGANIZATION

KÜRESEL REKABETİN KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR ANALİZİ: KUZEY ATLANTİK ANTLAŞMASI ÖRGÜTÜ (NATO) VE ŞANGAY İŞBİRLİĞİ ÖRGÜTÜ (ŞİÖ)

Pages
115–142
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Turkey can collaborate with SCO as long as it does not harm Turkey’s commitment in NATO.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this article is to compare and explain the similarities and differences of NATO and the SCO, in the context of Eurasianism which was part of daily discussion ın Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, organization objectives and classification, establishment processes, alliance obligations, threat perceptions, qualifications of members, decision making systems, responsibility fields, mutual interactions and activities were analyzed through comparative method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Turkey can collaborate with SCO as long as it does not harm Turkey’s commitment in NATO.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to compare and explain the similarities and differences of NATO and the SCO, in the context of Eurasianism which was part of daily discussion ın Turkey. For this purpose, organization objectives and classification, establishment processes, alliance obligations, threat perceptions, qualifications of members, decision making systems, responsibility fields, mutual interactions and activities were analyzed through comparative method. At the end of analysis, it was determined that there are considerable differences, despite some similarities, between NATO and SCO in aspect of quality, aim and context. Turkey can collaborate with SCO as long as it does not harm Turkey’s commitment in NATO.

Özet

Bu makalenin amacı, Türkiye’de gündemde olan Avrasyacılık tartışmaları bağlamında iki örgütün karşılaştırmalı analizini yapmak ve böylece NATO ve ŞİÖ’nün benzerliklerini ve farklılıklarını ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaçla örgütlerin, kuruluş amaçları ve sınıflandırılmaları, kuruluş süreçleri, ittifak yükümlükleri, tehdit algılamaları, üyelerin nitelikleri, karar alma sistemleri, sorumluluk sahaları ve etkinlikleri karşılaştırma yöntemi ile analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan analiz sonucunda, bazı benzerliklere rağmen, NATO ile ŞİÖ arasında nitelik, nitelik, amaç ve kapsam açısından önemli farklar olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Türkiye NATO yükümlülüklerine zarar vermeden ŞİÖ ile yakın işbirliği yapması olası görünmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, S., EMİNOĞLU1, A. (2022). A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GLOBAL COMPETITION: NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION AND SHANGHAI COOPERATION ORGANIZATION. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 52, 115–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/503486

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. AKIHIRO, Iwashita; (2004), “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and Its Implications for Eurasian Security: A New Dimension of “Partnership” after the Post-Cold War Period”, Slavic Eurasia’s Integration Into The World Economy and Community, in Shinichiro TABATA and Iwashita AKIHIRO (Ed ), Sapporo: Slavic Research Centre, Hokkaido University, pp. 259-281.
  2. AMBROSIO, Thomas; (2008), “Catching the ‘Shanghai Spirit’: How the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Promotes Authoritarian Norms in Central Asia”, Europe-Asia Studies, 60(8), pp. 1321-1344.
  3. ANDICAN, Ahat; (2006), “Çin Satrancında Orta Asya”, Avrasya Dosyası, 12 (1), pp. 14-16.
  4. ARI, Tayyar; (2013), Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Dış Politika, Bursa: MKM Yayıncılık. ARIS, Stephen; (2009), “The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation: ‘Tackling the Three Evils’. A Regional Response to Non-traditional Security Challenges or an Anti-Western Bloc?” Europe-Asia Studies, 61(3), pp. 457–482.
  5. BAILES, Alyson JK; (2007), “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and Europe”, China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, 5(3), pp. 13-18.
  6. BAILES, Alyson JK., Pal DUNAY, Pan GUANG and Mikhail TROİTSKİY; (2007) “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization” SIPRI Policy Paper, 17. BAIZAKOVA, Kuralai I.; (2013), “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization’s Role in Countering Threats and Challenges to Central Asian Regional Security”, Russian Politics and Law, 51(1), pp. 59–79.
  7. BLANK, Stephen; (2006), “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization as an Energy Club, Portents for the Future,” Central Asia-Caucuses Institute Analyst, Internet Address: https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/11121- analytical-articles-caci-analyst-2006-10-4-art-11121.html, Date of Access 15. 10. 2014, pp. 1-3.
  8. BRZEZİNSKI, Zbigniew; (2009), “An Agenda for NATO”, Foreign Affairs, Internet Address: http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/news/in-the- news/zbigniew-brzezinski-an-agenda-for-nato, Date of Access 15. 10. 2013.
  9. CARROLL, William E.; (2011), “China in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization: Hegemony, Multi-Polar Balance, or Cooperation in Central Asia”, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 1(19), pp. 1-8.
  10. CHENG, Joseph Y. S.; (2011), “The Shanghai Co-operation Organisation: China’s Initiative in Regional Institutional Building”, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 41(4), pp. 632–656.
  11. ÇAKMAK, Haydar; (2003),
  12. Avrupa Güvenliği, Ankara: Akçağ Yayınları. Charter of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, Internet Address: http://www.sectsco.org/EN123/show.