Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 54

THE EFFECTS OF HUMAN CAPITAL AND MACRO ECONOMIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL COMPONENTS ON INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS

BEŞERİ SERMAYE İLE MAKRO EKONOMİK VE TEKNOLOJİK UNSURLARIN ULUSLARARASI REKABET GÜCÜNE ETKİSİ

Pages
253–271
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This result once again demonstrates that countries which seek to gain competitive power in high-technology product exports should give importance to human capital investments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In our study aiming to analyze the impact of human capital and macro and technological variables on international competitiveness based on high technology product export, a total of 14 members of the G20 countries including Turkey, have been examined over the period of 1992-2014, with panel data analysis methods (panel unit root and panel cointegration).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The findings of the study showed that human capital variables such as human development index and life expectancy at birth affects international competitiveness based on high technology product exports positively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This result once again demonstrates that countries which seek to gain competitive power in high-technology product exports should give importance to human capital investments.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In our study aiming to analyze the impact of human capital and macro and technological variables on international competitiveness based on high technology product export, a total of 14 members of the G20 countries including Turkey, have been examined over the period of 1992-2014, with panel data analysis methods (panel unit root and panel cointegration). The findings of the study showed that human capital variables such as human development index and life expectancy at birth affects international competitiveness based on high technology product exports positively. This result once again demonstrates that countries which seek to gain competitive power in high-technology product exports should give importance to human capital investments.

Özet

Beşeri sermaye ile makro ve teknolojik değişkenlerin yüksek teknolojili ürün ihracatına dayalı uluslararası rekabet gücüne etkisini panel veri analizi yöntemleriyle (panel birim kök ve panel eşbütünleşme) analiz etmeyi amaçlayan çalışmamızda Türkiye dahil G20 üyesi toplam 14 ülke 1992-2014 dönemi itibariyle incelenmiştir. Uygulama neticesinde elde edilen bulgular, beşeri sermaye değişkenlerinden insani gelişme endeksi ile doğuştan yaşam süresinin yüksek teknolojili ürün ihracatına dayalı uluslararası rekabet gücünü genel olarak pozitif bir şekilde etkilediğini göstermiştir. Bu sonuç yüksek teknolojili ürün ihracatında rekabet gücü elde etmek isteyen ülkelerin beşeri sermaye yatırımlarına önem vermesi gerektiğini bir kez daha gözler önüne sermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

İLKAY, S. Ç., ATİK, H. (2022). THE EFFECTS OF HUMAN CAPITAL AND MACRO ECONOMIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL COMPONENTS ON INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 54, 253–271. https://ajindex.com/articles/503470

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aktan, C. C. ve Vural, İ. Y. (2004). Rekabet gücü ve rekabet stratejileri, rekabet dizisi:2. Ankara:
  2. Tisk Yayınları, Yayın No:254. Altay, A. ve Pazarlıoğlu, M. V. (2007). Uluslararası rekabet gücünde beşeri sermaye: ekonometrik yaklaşım. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal Ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt:2007, No.1, 96-108.
  3. Atik, H. ve İlkay, S. Ç. (2015). Beşeri sermaye ve dış ticaret ilişkisi: türkiye üzerine bir uygulama. Saarbrücken: Türkiye Alim Kitapları. Auer, A. R. (2015). Human capital and the dynamic effects of trade. Journal of Development Economics, Vol.117, No.1, 107-118.
  4. Baltagi, B., Feng, Q. ve Kao, C. (2012). A lagrange multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model. Center for Policy Research Breusch, T. ve Pagan, A. (1980). The lagrange multiplier test and ıts applications to model spesification in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, Vol.47, No.1, 239-253.
  5. Caldera, A. (2010). Innovation and exporting: evidence from Spanish Manufacturing Firms. Review of World Economics, Vol.146, No.4, 657-689.
  6. Chang, Y. (2004). Bootstrap Unit root tests in panel with cross-sectional dependency. Journal of Econometrics, Vol.120, No.2, 263-293.
  7. Chudik, A. ve Pesaran, H. M. (2015). Common correlated effects estimation of heterogenous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. Journal of Econometrics, Vol.188, No.2, 393-420.
  8. Fagerberg, J. (1988). International competitiveness. The Economic Journal, Vol.98, No.391, 355-374.
  9. Garelli, S. (2002). "Competitiveness of nations: the fundamentals" world competition yearbook. International Institute for Management Development (IMD). Kagochi, J. M. ve Jolly, C. M. (2010). R&D ınvestments, human capital, and the competitiveness of selected U.S. agricultural export commodities. International Journal of Applied Economics, Vol.7, No.1, 58-77.
  10. Keesing, D. B. (1965). Labor skills and ınternational trade: evaluating many trade flows with a single measuring device. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.47, No.3, 287-294.
  11. Keesing, D. B. (1967). The ımpact of research and development on United States. Journal of Political Economy, Vol.75, No.1, 38-48.
  12. Kenen, P. B. (1970). Skills, human capital and comparative advantage. National Bureau of Economic Research, 195-240.
  13. Khemani, R. ve Shapiro, D. (1993). Glossary of Industrial Organisation Economics and Competition Law. Krugman, P. (1994). Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession. Foreign Affairs, 28-44.
  14. Kuna, J.