SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 56

38Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 56, Mayıs-Ağustos2020THE MODERATING ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITY ON THE EFFECT OF INNOVATION AND RISK TAKING TENDENCY ON THE FIRM PERFORMANCE

İNOVASYON VE RİSK ALMA EĞİLİMİNİN İŞLETME PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİNDE ULUSLARARASI FAALİYETTE BULUNMANIN DÜZENLEYİCİ ROLÜ

Ferda ÜSTÜN
Ayşe İpek KOCA BALLI
Pages
37–63
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the research, innovation and risk taking tendencies of enterprises have a positive effect on firm performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to determine whether international activity plays a moderating role in the relationship between the innovation and risk taking tendencies of firms and firm performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was carried out on the companies in the list created by Istanbul Chamber of Industry (ISO): ―Turkey’s secand 500 Industrial Enterprises 2016‖.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the research, innovation and risk taking tendencies of enterprises have a positive effect on firm performance.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine whether international activity plays a moderating role in the relationship between the innovation and risk taking tendencies of firms and firm performance. The study was carried out on the companies in the list created by Istanbul Chamber of Industry (ISO): ―Turkey’s secand 500 Industrial Enterprises 2016‖. Within the scope of the research, 849 questionnaires obtained from companies were used. According to the results of the research, innovation and risk taking tendencies of enterprises have a positive effect on firm performance. However, it is seen that international activitieshas a moderating role on the effect of firms’ innovation and risk taking tendencies on the firm performance.

Özet

Bu çalıĢmanın amacı, iĢletmelerin inovasyon ve risk alma eğilimlerinin iĢletme performansı ile iliĢkisinde uluslararası faaliyette bulunmanın düzenleyici bir rol üstlenip üstlenmediğini belirlemektir. AraĢtırma, Ġstanbul Sanayi Odasının (ĠSO) ―Türkiye’nin ikinci 500 Büyük Sanayi KuruluĢu‖ 2016 listesinde yer alan iĢletmeler üzerinde gerçekleĢtirilmiĢtir. AraĢtırma kapsamında iĢletmelerden elde edilen 849 anket kullanılmıĢtır. AraĢtırma sonuçlarına göre iĢletmelerin inovasyon ve risk alma eğilimleri iĢletme performansı üzerinde olumlu bir etkiye sahiptir. Bununla birlikte iĢletmelerin inovasyon eğilimleri ve risk alma davranıĢlarının iĢletme performansına etkisinde uluslararası olmanın, düzenleyici bir etkiye sahip olduğu görülmüĢt

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜSTÜN, F., BALLI, A. İ. K. (2022). 38Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 56, Mayıs-Ağustos2020THE MODERATING ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITY ON THE EFFECT OF INNOVATION AND RISK TAKING TENDENCY ON THE FIRM PERFORMANCE. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 56, 37–63. https://ajindex.com/articles/503403

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Acedo, F. J. and Jones, M. V. (2007). Speed of internationalization and entrepreneurial cognition: Insights and a comparison between international new ventures, exporters and domestic firms. Journal of World Business, 42(3), 236-252.
  2. Agmon, T. and Lessard, D. R. (1977). Investor recognition of corporate international diversification, The Journal of Finance, 32(4), 1049-1055.
  3. Akalın, S. (1970). Yönetim ekonomisi.Ġzmir: Ege Üniv. Ġ.T.Ġ.A. Yayını. Alpkan, L., Ergün, E., Bulut, Ç. veYılmaz, C. (2005). ġirket giriĢimciliğinin Ģirket performansına etkileri, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi,6(2), 175-189.
  4. Alsoy, M.(1998).Uluslararasılaşmayı hedefleyen firmaların ihracatı geliştirme süreci(YayınlanmamıĢ Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. AltuntaĢ, G. ve Dömez, D. (2010). GiriĢimcilik yönelimi ve örgütsel performans iliĢkisi: Çanakkalebölgesinde faaliyet gösteren otel iĢletmelerinde bir araĢtırma. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business Administration, 39(1), 50-74.
  5. Anderson, E. and Gatington, H. (1986). On the internationalization of firms: A critical analysis, Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 1-26.
  6. Antoncic, B. (2007). Intrapreneurship: A comparative structural equation modeling study, Industrial Management ve Data Systems, 107(3), 309-325.
  7. Antoncic, B. and Hisrich, R. D. (2001). Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and crosscultural validation, Journal of Business Venturing,16, 495-527. Araújo, J. F. (2008). The impact of internationalization on firm’s performance: A qualitative study of Portuguese SMEs(Doctoral Dissertation). ISCTE Business School, Instituto Superior de Ciências do Trabalho e da Empresa, Portugal.EriĢim Adresi: https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/bitstream/10071/1452/1/Master%20Thesis%20Final%20-%20Joao%20Araujo.pdf
  8. Azar, G. and Drogendijk, R. (2014). Psychic distance, innovation, and firm performance, Management International Review, 54(5), 581-613.
  9. Banks, E. (2012). Risk culture: A practical guide to building and strengthening the fabric of risk management. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage,Journal of management, 17 (1), 99-120.
  10. Bausch, A. and Krist, M. (2007). The effect of context-related moderators on the internationalization-performance relationship: Evidence frommeta-analysis, Management International Review,47(3), 319-347.
  11. Berry, H., Guillén, M. F. and Zhou, N. (2010). An institutional approach to cross-national dist