SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 57

A NEED FOR NEOCLASSICAL REALIST APPROACH IN INTERNATINOAL POLITICAL ECONOMY: THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION

ULUSLARARASI EKONOMİ POLİTİKTE NEOKLASİK REALİZME DUYULAN İHTİYAÇ: AVRASYA EKONOMİ TOPLULUĞU

Mehmet ŞAHİN
Pages
273–292
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Eurasian Economic Union will be taken in the last section of the work as the case study to test the validity of the model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study refers to the importance of the neoclassical realist approach in international political economy studies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The domestic structures of the states will be emphasized in order to understand the reasons for the varieties of capitalist models and hybrid economic systems that emerged after the Cold War.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Eurasian Economic Union will be taken in the last section of the work as the case study to test the validity of the model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study refers to the importance of the neoclassical realist approach in international political economy studies. The domestic structures of the states will be emphasized in order to understand the reasons for the varieties of capitalist models and hybrid economic systems that emerged after the Cold War. In this sense, the article argues that neoclassical realism could be useful to understand the regional differences in international political economy, despite the critics. Accordingly, the dominant view of the international system, which is liberalism, is the independent variable and the domestic variables of states are the intervening variables. The outcomes that are the hybrid systems are the dependent variable. The theoretical part of the study will examine these variables in detail. The Eurasian Economic Union will be taken in the last section of the work as the case study to test the validity of the model.

Özet

Bu çalışma uluslararası ekonomi politik çalışmalarında neoklasik yaklaşımın öneminedeğinmektedir. Çalışmada farklı kapitalist modellerin ve özellikle Soğuk Savaş sonrasında ortayaçıkan hibrit ekonomik sistemlerin sebebini anlamak için devletlerin içyapılarının önemli olduğunavurgu yapılacaktır. Bu bakımdan çalışma, uluslararası ekonomideki bölgesel farklılıkları anlamakiçin bütün eleştirilere rağmen neoklasik realist yaklaşımın faydalı olacağını iddia etmektedir. Bunagöre uluslararası sistemin hâkim anlayışı olan liberalizm bağımsız değişken, devletlerin içyapılarıda ara değişkendir. Ortaya çıkan hibrit sistemler de bağımlı değişkendir. Çalışmanın teorikbölümünde bu değişkenler ayrıntılı olarak ele alınacaktır. Modelin geçerliliğini göstermek içinçalışmanın son bölümünde Avrasya Ekonomi Topluluğu vaka çalışması olarak ele alınacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, M. (2022). A NEED FOR NEOCLASSICAL REALIST APPROACH IN INTERNATINOAL POLITICAL ECONOMY: THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 57, 273–292. https://ajindex.com/articles/503401

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Acharya, A. (2005). Do norms and identity matter?: Community and power in Southeast Asia's regional order. The Pacific Review, 18(1), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740500047199
  2. Acharya, A. (2017). After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order. Ethics & International Affairs, 31(3), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1017/S089267941700020X
  3. Barkin, J. S. (2010).
  4. Realist constructivism. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Bayramov, V., Breban, D., & Mukhtarov, E. (2019). Economic effects estimation for the Eurasian Economic Union: Application of regional linear regression. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 52(3), 209– 225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2019.07.001
  6. Bello, W. (2009). States and markets, states versus markets: the developmental state debate as the distinctive East Asian contribution to international political economy. In M. Blyth (Ed.), Routledge international handbooks. Routledge handbook of international political economy (IPE): IPE as a global conversation (pp. 180–200). London: Routledge. Cooley, A. (2019). Ordering Eurasia: The Rise and Decline of Liberal Internationalism in the Post-Communist Space. Security Studies, 28(3), 588–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2019.1604988
  7. Gilpin, R. (1983). War and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Gilpin, R. (1984). The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism. International Organization, 38(2), 287–304.
  9. Gilpin, R. (1987). The political economy of international relations. Princeton, Guildford: Princeton University Press.
  10. Gilpin, R. (2001). Global political economy: Understanding the international economic order. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  11. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. W. (Eds.) (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Hirschman, A. O. (1980). National power and the structure of foreign trade (Expanded ed.). The Politics of the international economy: Vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  13. Hyde, S. D., & Saunders, E. N. (2020). Recapturing Regime Type in International Relations: Leaders, Institutions, and Agency Space.International Organization, 74(2), 363–395. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818319000365
  14. Kiraz, S. (2018). Dış Politika Analizi Modeli Olarak Neoklasik Realizm: İkinci Dünya Savaşı Sırasındaki Türk Dış Politikasının Analizi. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi,