Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 57

THEORETICAL POSITION OF ENGLISH SCHOOL IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: A MARXIST CRITICAL READING

İNGİLİZ OKULU’NUN ULUSLARARASI İLİŞKİLERDEKİ KURAMSAL KONUMU: MARKSİST BİR ELEŞTİREL OKUMA

Pages
171–204
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To prove its argument, this work aims at critically inquiring the unique arguments and theoretical position of the English School in International Relations through the questions of Marxism, as being not only an economical, sociological and philosophical theory but also a method of critical reading, on the knowledge that is produced by whom and for whom, and for what purposes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Promising the “middle ground” between the two poles of the Mainstream Theories of International Relations, the English School seeks to provide an insight to the International Relations, bringing the “international society” to the theoretical debates.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since the promise of the English School limits the criticism of the capacities of the Mainstream Theories of International Relations, the work argues that the Marxist method of critical reading can help overcome the limits of the criticisms directed towards the English School.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To prove its argument, this work aims at critically inquiring the unique arguments and theoretical position of the English School in International Relations through the questions of Marxism, as being not only an economical, sociological and philosophical theory but also a method of critical reading, on the knowledge that is produced by whom and for whom, and for what purposes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Promising the “middle ground” between the two poles of the Mainstream Theories of International Relations, the English School seeks to provide an insight to the International Relations, bringing the “international society” to the theoretical debates. Since the promise of the English School limits the criticism of the capacities of the Mainstream Theories of International Relations, the work argues that the Marxist method of critical reading can help overcome the limits of the criticisms directed towards the English School. To prove its argument, this work aims at critically inquiring the unique arguments and theoretical position of the English School in International Relations through the questions of Marxism, as being not only an economical, sociological and philosophical theory but also a method of critical reading, on the knowledge that is produced by whom and for whom, and for what purposes.

Özet

Ana-akım Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramları’na, iki ucunu birleştirecek bir orta yol vadedenİngiliz Okulu, “uluslararası toplum” kavramını; kuramsal tartışmalara taşıyarak, Uluslararasıİlişkiler’e bir içebakış sağlamayı hedeflemektedir. İngiliz Okulu’nun bu vaadi, ana-akımUluslararası İlişkiler’den İngiliz Okulu’nu hedef alan eleştirileri sınırlamaktadır. Bu çalışma İngilizOkulu’na yönelik eleştirilerin bu sınırlarının, Marksist bir okuma yöntemiyle aşılabileceğini önesürmektedir. Bu argüman doğrultusunda çalışma; iktisadi, sosyolojik ve felsefi bir kuram olmanınyanında bir eleştirel okuma yöntemi olarak Marksizm’in; bilginin kim tarafından ve ne içinüretildiği ile hangi amaçlara hizmet ettiği hususlarındaki soruları çerçevesinde İngiliz Okulu’nunözgün argümanlarını ve Uluslararası İlişkiler’deki kuramsal konumunu eleştirel biçimdesorgulamayı amaçlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAN, G., ÖZKAN, E. Ş. (2022). THEORETICAL POSITION OF ENGLISH SCHOOL IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: A MARXIST CRITICAL READING. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 57, 171–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/503400

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Althusser, L., Balibar, E. ve Establet, R. (Ed.). (2007). Kapital’i okumak. Işık Ergüden (çev.). İstanbul:
  2. İthaki. Armstrong, D. (1993). Revolution and World Order: The Revolutionary State in International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  3. Balibar, E. ve Wallerstein, I (2000). Irk ulus sınıf: belirsiz kimlikler, Nazlı Ökten (çev.).(3. Baskı). İstanbul:
  4. Metis. Bensaid, D. (2011). Marx kullanım kılavuzu. İstanbul:
  5. Habitus Kitap. Bottomore, T. (Ed.). (1988). Introduction. Interpretations of Marx. içinde (s. 1- 19). New York: Basil Blackwell. Bottomore, T., Laurence, H., Kieman, V.G. ve Miliband, R. (Eds.). (1983). A dictionary of Marxist Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  6. Brenner, E. L. (1988).Marx and Engels on Nationalism and National Identity: A Reappraisal. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17(1), 1-23.
  7. Brown, C. (1995). International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way. Review of International Studies, 21(2), 183-196.
  8. Brown, C. (2000). The English School: International Theory and International Society. Mathias Albert, Lothar Brock, ve Klaus Dieter Wolf (Eds.). Civilizing world politics: society and community beyond the state. içinde (s. 91-102).
  9. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield. Brown, C. (2001). World Society and the English School: An International Society Perspective on World Society. European Journal of International Relations, 7(4), 423-441.
  10. Bull, H. (1966a). International Theory: The Case for the Classical Approach. World Politics, 18(3), 361-377.
  11. Bull, H. (1966b). The Grotian Conception of International Society”, Martin Wight, Herbert Butterfiled (der.), Diplomatic investigations: Essays in the theory of International Politics, Londra, Allen and Unwin, 1966b, s. 63-64.
  12. Bull, H.(1976). Martin Wight and the Theory of International Relations: The Second Martin Wight Memorial Lecture. British Journal of International Studies, 2(2), 101-116.
  13. Bull, H. (1992). The anarchical society: a study of order in World Politics, 1977. Londra: Macmillian. Bull, H. (2000). International Relations as an Academic Pursuit. Kai Alderson ve Andrew Hurrell, (Eds). Hedley Bull on international society. içinde (s. 246-264) Londra: Macmillan. Bull, H. ve Watson A. (Eds.). (1984). Conclusion. The expansion of international society. içinde (s. 430-435). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14. Buzan, B.(1991). People, states and fear: An agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. (2. Baskı). Londra: