SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2013 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 169

Yükseköğretim kurumlarında toplumsal cinsiyet ve akademik kariyer: Portekiz ve Türkiye için kültürlerarası karşılaştırmalı bir araştırma

Gender and academic careers in Portuguese and Turkish higher education institutions

Özlem ÖZKANLI
Maria de Lourdes TAYLOR MACHADO
Pages
346–356
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper examines the gender effect on academic career development and the main differences in male and female academic careers to determine the real impact of gender on the development of academic careers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A major paradox has developed in higher education institutions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although participation rate of female undergraduates has increased significantly, the participation of women in academia has not increased by the same proportion.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper examines the gender effect on academic career development and the main differences in male and female academic careers to determine the real impact of gender on the development of academic careers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

A major paradox has developed in higher education institutions. Although participation rate of female undergraduates has increased significantly, the participation of women in academia has not increased by the same proportion. Moreover, women experience several challenges. This research examines the participation of academic women in higher education (HE) in Portugal and Turkey. Education statistics for these countries show that women continue to lag behind men in academia specifically in science, mathematics, and engineering. Also, education stereotyping continues; with women relegated to so-called women s disciplines and programs in engineering, physics, and the so-called hard sciences continue to be dominated by men. This paper examines the gender effect on academic career development and the main differences in male and female academic careers to determine the real impact of gender on the development of academic careers.

Özet

Türkiye ve Portekizde yükseköğretim kurumlarında lisans düzeyinde kız öğrencilerin sayısı büyük oranda artmasına rağmen, kadın akademisyenlerin üst düzey yönetimdeki yüzdesi aynı oranda artmamıştır. Her iki ülkede de kadınlar mesleki alanda farklı birçok sorun ile karşılaşmaktadır. Bu alan araştırmasında, Portekiz ve Türkiyede yükseköğretim kurumlarında kadın akademisyenlerin durumu ve düşük temsil oranının nedenleri incelenmektedir. Her iki ülkedeki eğitim istatistikleri, yükseköğretim kurumlarında kadınların hem genel olarak, hem de Fen, Matematik ve Mühendislik alanlarında erkeklerden geride kaldığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca, mühendislik, fizik ve diğer pozitif bilimlerin erkek egemen özelliğinin devam edeceğine ve kadınlara daha uygun olduğu düşünülen bazı alanların bulunduğuna ilişkin eğitimde kalıplaşmış bir önyargı halen devam etmektedir. Bu araştırmada akademik kariyer gelişiminde toplumsal cinsiyetin etkisi, kadın ve erkek akademisyenlerin kariyer gelişimlerindeki başlıca farklılıklar karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKANLI, Ö., MACHADO, M. D. L. T. (2022). Yükseköğretim kurumlarında toplumsal cinsiyet ve akademik kariyer: Portekiz ve Türkiye için kültürlerarası karşılaştırmalı bir araştırma. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 169, 346–356. https://ajindex.com/articles/497490

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Acar, F. (1986). Working women in a changing society: The case of Jordanian academics. METU Studies in Development, 10, 307-324.
  2. Acar, F. (1991). Women in academic science in Turkey. In V. Stolse-Heiskanen, et al. (Eds.), Women in science: Token women or gender equality? (pp. 147-171). London: Billing. Acker, S. (1992). New perspectives on an old problem: The position of women academics in British higher education. Higher Education, 24(1), 57-75. Amâncio, L. (2003). Gender and science in Portugal. Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 1(3), 185-198.
  3. Amaral, A. & Magalhães, A. (2004). Privatization of higher education and state interference. Paper Presented At The 17th Cher Annual Conference, University of Twente, Enchede. Amaral, A. & Magalhães, A. (2005). Implementation of higher education policies: A Portuguese example. In Å. Gornitzka, M. Kogan & A. Amaral (Eds.), Reform and Change In Higher Education (pp. 117-134).
  4. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. Bagilhole, B. (2002). Challenging equal opportunities: Changing and adapting male hegemony in academia. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(1), 19-33.
  5. Bagilhole, B. (2007). Challenging women in the male academy: Thinking about draining the swamp. In P. Cotterill, S. Jackson, & G. Wetherby (Eds.), Challenges And Negotiations For Women In Higher Education (pp. 21-32).
  6. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. Bagilhole, B. & White, K. (2008). Towards a gendered skills analysis of senior management positions in UK and Australian universities. Tertiary Education and Management, 14(1), 1-12.
  7. Bagilhole, B. & White, K. (2011). Gender, power and management: A cross-cultural analysis of higher education. Basingstoke: Great Britain, Palgrave. Berthoin, A. & Izraeli, D. N. (1993). A global comparison of women in management: Women managers in their homelands and as expatriates. In E. Fagenson (Eds.), Women In Management: Trends, Issues, and Challenges In Managerial Diversity (pp. 52-96).
  8. Newbury Park, Ca: Sage. Carrington, K. & Pratt, A.(2003). How far have we come? gender disparities in the australian higher education system. Current Issues Brief No. 31, Information And Research Services. Canberra: Department of the Parliamentary Library. Carvalho, T. & Machado, M. L. (2010). Gender and shifts in higher education managerial regimes: examples from Portugal. Australian Universities’ Review, 52(2), 33-42.
  9. Council of Europe (2000).
  10. Final report of activities, Strasbourg. Council of Higher Education (YÖK). (2011).