SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2012 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of hydraulic guillotine alternatives with TOPSIS method for production companies

Üretim yapan işletmeler için hidrolik giyotin alternatiflerinin TOPSIS yöntemi ile incelenmesi

Aşkın ÖZDAĞOĞLU
Pages
549–562
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Preference ranking of 66 different models have been determined by taking into account all of these criteria together from the viewpoint of the companies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims at evaluating of hydraulic guillotine alternatives with TOPSIS method for production companies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Evaluation criteria are shearing capacity, maximum cutting length, maksimum rake angle, total number of holddowns and engine power.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Preference ranking of 66 different models have been determined by taking into account all of these criteria together from the viewpoint of the companies.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims at evaluating of hydraulic guillotine alternatives with TOPSIS method for production companies. Evaluation criteria are shearing capacity, maximum cutting length, maksimum rake angle, total number of holddowns and engine power. Preference ranking of 66 different models have been determined by taking into account all of these criteria together from the viewpoint of the companies.

Özet

Bu çalışma üretim yapan işletmeler için hidrolik giyotin alternatiflerinin TOPSIS yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesini amaçlamıştır. Değerlendirme ölçütleri kesme kapasitesi, maksimum kesme boyu, maksimum kesme açısı, toplam baskı silindiri sayısı ve motor gücüdür. İşletmeler açısından bu ölçütler birarada düşünülerek 66 farklı modelin tercih sırası belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDAĞOĞLU, A. (2022). Evaluation of hydraulic guillotine alternatives with TOPSIS method for production companies. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4, 549–562. https://ajindex.com/articles/495433

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aalami, H.A. Moghaddam, M.P. ve Yousefi, G.R. (2010) “Modeling and Prioritizing Demand Response Programs in Power Markets” Electric Power Systems Research, 80:426-435.
  2. Amiri, M. Zandieh, M. Vahdani, B. Soltani, R. ve Roshanaei, V. (2010) “An Integrated Eigenvector-DEATOPSIS Methodology for Portfolio Risk Evaluation in the FOREX Spot Market” Expert Systems with Applications, 37:509-516.
  3. Ayala, J.G. (2012) “Selecting Irrigation Water Pricing Alternatives Using A Multi-Methodological Approach” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 55:861-883.
  4. Boix, M. Montastruc, L. Pibouleau, L. Azzaro- Pantel, C. ve Domenech, S. (2011) “A Multiobjective Optimization Framework for Multicontaminant Industrial Water Network Design” Journal of Environmental Management, 92:1802-1808.
  5. Chang, C.H., Lin, J.J., Lin, J.H. ve Chiang, M.C. (2010) “Domestic Open-End Equity Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation Using Extended TOPSIS Method with Different Distance Approaches” Expert Systems with Applications. 37:4642-4649.
  6. Chen, M.F. Tzeng, G.H. (2004) “Combining Grey Relation and TOPSIS Concepts For Selecting An Expatriate Host Country” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40:1473-1490.
  7. Dai, L. ve Wang, J. (2011) “Evaluation of the Profitability of Power Listed Companies Based on Entropy Improved TOPSIS Method” Procedia Engineering, 15:4728-4732.
  8. Fazlollahtabar, H. (2010) “A Subjective Framework for Seat Comfort Based on A Heuristic Multi Criteria Decision Making Technique and Anthropometry” Applied Ergonomics. 42:16-28.
  9. Frini, A., Guitouni, A. ve Martel, J.M. (2012) “A General Decomposition Approach for Multi-Criteria Decision Trees” European Journal of Operational Research, 220:452-460.
  10. Garcia, F., Guijarro, F. ve Moya, I. (2010) “A Goal Programming Approach to Estimating Performance Weights for Ranking Firms” Computers & Operations Research, 37:1597-1609. Baykal Machine Tools (2012a) http://www.baykal. com.tr/TR/hgl.asp?id=5, (07.05.2012). Baykal Machine Tools (2012b) http://www.baykal. com.tr/TR/hnc.asp?id=6, (07.05.2012). Baykal Machine Tools (2012c) http://www.baykal. com.tr/TR/mgh.asp?id=4, (07.05.2012). Mvd Inan Takım Tezgahları Sanayi A.Ş. (2012) http://www.mvdinan.com/tr/urun/giyotin-makas.pdf, (07.05.2012). Ostim Makina Sanayi ve TicretA.Ş. (2012a) http:// www.ostimmakina.com/index.php?lang=tr&page=8&pr odCatID=1&prodID=30, (07.05.2012). Ostim Makina Sanayi ve TicretA.Ş. (2012b) http://www.ostimmakina.com/index.php?lang=tr&p age=8&prodCatID=1&prodID=28, (07.05.2012). Töreci Makin