Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2011 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Using financial ratios to distinguish between participation and conventional banks: a case study of Turkey

Finansal rasyoların katılım bankaları ve geleneksel bankalar arasında bir tasnif aracı olarak kullanımı: Türkiye örneği

Pages
397–405
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We input 23 financial ratios into logit analysis models to determine whether researchers could use these ratios to distinguish between the two types of banks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Islamic banks are organized under and operate upon principles of Islamic law which requires risk sharing and prohibits the payment or receipt of interest.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In contrast, conventional banks are guided mainly by the profit-maximization principle.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We input 23 financial ratios into logit analysis models to determine whether researchers could use these ratios to distinguish between the two types of banks.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Islamic banks are organized under and operate upon principles of Islamic law which requires risk sharing and prohibits the payment or receipt of interest. In contrast, conventional banks are guided mainly by the profit-maximization principle. If the differences between the two types of banks are not just semantic, Islamic and conventional banks should be distinguishable from one another on the basis of financial information obtained from company balance sheets and income statements. The purpose of this paper is to determine whether Islamic and conventional banks in Turkey are distinguishable from one another on the basis of financial characteristics alone. We input 23 financial ratios into logit analysis models to determine whether researchers could use these ratios to distinguish between the two types of banks.

Özet

Katılım bankaları geleneksel bankalardan farklı olarak risk paylaşımı ve faiz yasağı gibi İslami kurallara dayalı olarak faaliyet gösterirler. Buna karşılık geleneksel bankalar kar maksimizasyonu hedefiyle faaliyetlerini yürütürler. Eğer bu iki tip banka arasındaki fark sadece sözde kalmıyorsa, İslami ve geleneksel bankalar bilanço ve gelir tablolarından elde edilecek finansal bilgilere dayalı olarak birbirlerinden ayrılabilmelidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren geleneksel ve katılım bankaları arasında finansal karakteristikleri baz alınarak ayrım yapılıp yapılamayacağını belirlemektir. Logit analiz modelinde 23 finansal rasyo kullanılmak suretiyle araştırmacıların iki banka tipi arasında ayrım yapılıp yapılmayacağını belirlemeye çalışılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

PARLAKKAYA, R., ÇÜRÜK, S. A. (2022). Using financial ratios to distinguish between participation and conventional banks: a case study of Turkey. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 397–405. https://ajindex.com/articles/649876

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Alpay, S. ve Hassan, M.K. (2007) “A Comparative Efficiency Analysis of Interest Free Financial Institutions and Conventional Banks: A Case Study on Turkey” Economic Research Forum Working Paper Series, November. Atlaş, G. (2008) “İslami Finans Sistemi” Sermaye Piyasasında Gündem, TSPAKB, 69: 19-30.
  2. Ariss R.T. (2010) “Competitive Conditions in Islamic and Conventional Banking: A Global Perspective”, Review of Financial Economics, 19(3):101-108.
  3. Bader, M.K., Mohamad, S. ve diğerleri (2008) “Cost, Revenue, and Profit Efficiency of Islamic Versus Conventional Banks: International Evidence Using Data Envelopment Analysis” Islamic Economic Studies, 15(2): 23-76.
  4. Birdal, M. (2007) “İslam Bankacılığı Ne Kadar Alternatif?” Evrensel Gazetesi (06.10.2007), http://www.Evrensel.Net/Haber. Php?Haber_İd=18227, (10.04.2010).
  5. Iqbal, M.M. (2006) “A Broader Definition of Riba” Pakistan Institute of Development Economics Working Paper. Işık, I. ve Hassan, M.K. (2002) “Technical, Scale and Allocative Efficiencies of Turkish Banking Industry” Journal of Banking and Finance, 26(4): 719-766.
  6. Olson, D. ve Zoubi, T.A. (2008) “Using Accounting Ratios to Distinguish Between Islamic and Conventional Banks in The GCC Region” The International Journal Of Accounting, 43(1):45-65.
  7. Onour, I.A. ve Abdalla, A.M.A (2010) “Efficiency of Islamic Banks in Sudan: A Non-Parametric Approach” Arap Planning Institute Working Paper Series. http://www.arab-api.org/ jodep/products/delivery/wps1012.pdf Özulucan, A. ve Deran, A. (2009) “Katılım Bankacılığı İle Geleneksel Bankaların Bankacılık Hizmetleri Ve Muhasebe Uygulamaları Açısından Karsılaştırılması” Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(6): 85-108.
  8. Samad, A. ve Hassan, M.K (1999) “The Performance of Malaysian Islamic Bank During 1984-1997: An Exploratory Study” International Journal of Islamic Financial Services, 1(3). Sufian, F. (2007) “The Efficiency of Islamic Banking Industry: A Non-Parametric Analysis With Non-Discretionary Input Variable” Islamic Economic Studies, 14(1-2):53-78.
  9. Şimşek, B. (2006) Katılım Bankalarında Hizmet Kalitesinin Ölçülmesi ve Örnek Bir Uygulama, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimler Enstitüsü. TKBB (Türkiye Katılım Bankaları Birliği), www.tkbb.org. tr. Viverita, K.B. and Skully, M. (2007) “Efficiency Analysis of Islamic Banks in Africa, Asia and the Middle East” Review of Islamic Economics, 11(2):5-16.
  10. Yılmaz, O.N. (2010) “Faizsiz Bankacılık İlkeleri ve Katılı