SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

Information Technologies competency of enterprises: A scale adaptation study

İşletmelerde kaynak Temelli Bilgi teknolojileri yetkinliği: Bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması

İsmail TOKMAK
Yunus GÖKMEN
Ufuk TÜREN
Pages
425–439
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

And second one is consist of the managers of manufacturing industry firms in Ankara.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Information Technologies (IT) competency of enterprise is con- sidered one of the important aspects for creating competitive advantage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although some micro level scales measuring IT com- petency of firms are exist in the literature, in order to fulfill the requirement of a Turkish Scale measuring firm level IT capability by establishing its reliability and validity on Turkish enterprises can provide a significant contribution.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:And second one is consist of the managers of manufacturing industry firms in Ankara.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Information Technologies (IT) competency of enterprise is con- sidered one of the important aspects for creating competitive advantage. Although some micro level scales measuring IT com- petency of firms are exist in the literature, in order to fulfill the requirement of a Turkish Scale measuring firm level IT capability by establishing its reliability and validity on Turkish enterprises can provide a significant contribution. This scale development study may be useful for scholar exploring the relationships of IT competency with other variables. In this study, IT competency which is developed by Tippins ve Sohi (2003) is held through three scales named; IT Knowledge, IT Objects and the success of IT operations. At the end of the analysis Turkish version of the IT competency scale is found to be reliable and valid considering two different samples. The first sample comprises the bank of- ficials and managers in Çorum. And second one is consist of the managers of manufacturing industry firms in Ankara.

Özet

Son yıllarda işletmelerde rekabet avantajı yaratan en önemlihususlardan birisi Bilgi Teknolojileri (BT) yetkinliği olarak görülmektedir. Mikro seviyede firma bazında BT yetkinliğini ölçmeye yönelik yazında bir takım çalışmalar bulunsa da ülkemizde konu üzerinde çalışacak araştırmacıların kullanabileceği, geçerliği ve güvenilirliği Türk firmaları üzerinde denemiş bir ölçeğin derlenerek gerekli testlerin yapılmasının yerli yazın- da önemli bir açığı kapatacağı ve BT yetkinliği ile diğer bazıdeğişkenler arasındaki ilişkileri incelemek için araştırmacılarafayda sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir. Bu çalışmada Tippins ve Sohi (2003) tarafından geliştirilen BT Bilgisi, BT Nesneleri ve BTOperasyonları olmak üzere üç boyuttan oluşan ölçek ele alınmıştır. Analizlerin sonucunda BT yetkinliği ölçeğinin Çorum’da bulunan bankalarda çalışan meslek memurları ve yöneticileri ile Ankara’daki imalat sanayi yöneticilerinden oluşan iki farklıörneklem için geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOKMAK, İ., GÖKMEN, Y., TÜREN, U. (2022). Information Technologies competency of enterprises: A scale adaptation study. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 425–439. https://ajindex.com/articles/495367

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Anderson J.C. ve Gerbing D.W. (1984) “The Effect of Sampling Error on Convergence, Improper Solutions, and Goodness-of-Fit Indices For Maximum Likelihood Con- firmatory Factor Analysis” Psychometrika, 49:155-173.
  2. Barney J.B. (1991) “Firm Resources and Sus- tained Competitive Advantage” Journal of Management, 17(1):99-120.
  3. Barney, J.B., Wright, M. ve Ketchen, DJ.Jr. (2001) “The Resource-Based View of the Firm: Ten Years After 1991” Journal of Management, 27:625-641.
  4. Bartel, A., Ichniowski, C. ve Shaw, K. (2007) “How Does İnformation Technology Affect Productivity? Plant- Level Comparisons of Product Innovation, Process Im- provement, and Worker Skills” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4):1721-1758.
  5. Becker, A., Hagenberg, N., Roessner, V., Woerner, W. ve Rothenberger, A. (2004) “Evaluation of the Self- Reported Sdq in A Clinical Setting: Do Self-Report Tell Us More Than Ratings By Adult Informants? European Child ve Adolescent Psychiatry, 13:17-24.
  6. Bensaou, M. (1993) “Interorganizational Coopera- tion: The Role of Information Technology An Empiri- cal Comparison of US and Japanese Supplier Relations” 14th Annual International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), December 5-8,
  7. Orlando, FL, USA. Bensghir, K.T. (1996) Bilgi Teknolojileri ve Örgütsel Değişim, 1.Baskı,
  8. Ankara,
  9. TODAİE Yayınları.
  10. Bharadwaj, A.S. (2000) “A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation”, MIS Quarterly, 24(1):169-196.
  11. Bollen, K.A. (1989) Structural Equations With Latent Variables, 1st Edition,
  12. NewYork, Wiley. Brislin, R.W., Lonner, W.J. ve Thorndike, R.M. (1973) Cross-Cultural Research Methods, 1st Edition,
  13. Canada, John Wiley&Sons Pub. Browne, M.W. ve Cudeck, R. (1993) “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit” K.A. Bollen ve J.S. Long (eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models,nNewbury Park, CA, USA, Sage Publications. Bülbül, H. ve Demirer, Ö. (2008) “Hizmet Kalitesi Ölçüm Modelleri SERVQUAL ve SERPERF’in Karşılaştırmalı Analizi” Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20:181-198.
  14. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007) Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı, 7. Baskı,
  15. Ankara,
  16. Pegem A Yayıncılık. Byrne, B.M. (1994) Structural Equation Modeling With EQS and EQS/Windows, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, Sage Publications. Chan, S.L. (2000) “Information Technology in Business Processes” Business Process Management Journal, 6(3):224-237.
  17. Clemons E.K. ve Row M.C. (1991) “Sustaining IT Advantage: The Role of Structura