SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies / 2012 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2

THE EFFECT OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP ON ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION AND PERCEIVED CORPORATE REPUTATION: A UNIVERSITY SAMPLE

Hakan Turgut
İsmail Tokmak
Cem Güçel
Pages
245–254
Publication Date
2012-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Apart from this, it has been understood that organizational identification plays an important part on the relationship between transformational leadership and perceived corporate reputation

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study has been done in a sample university to find out the effects of transformational leadership on organizational identification and perceived corporate reputation and to see whether organizational identification plays a part in this effect.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To see the effects and to find out whether organizational identification plays a part in this effect, a survey was carried out on 214 academic and administrative staff of a private university.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Apart from this, it has been understood that organizational identification plays an important part on the relationship between transformational leadership and perceived corporate reputation
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Transformational Leadership · Organizational Identification · Perceived Corporate Reputation

Abstract

This study has been done in a sample university to find out the effects of transformational leadership on organizational identification and perceived corporate reputation and to see whether organizational identification plays a part in this effect. To see the effects and to find out whether organizational identification plays a part in this effect, a survey was carried out on 214 academic and administrative staff of a private university. The results of the survey were analyzed through regression analysis. According to these results, there is a positive and significant relationship between transformational leadership, organizational identification and corporate reputation. Apart from this, it has been understood that organizational identification plays an important part on the relationship between transformational leadership and perceived corporate reputation

🔖

Cite This Article

Turgut, H., Tokmak, İ., Güçel, C. (2012). THE EFFECT OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP ON ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION AND PERCEIVED CORPORATE REPUTATION: A UNIVERSITY SAMPLE. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 245–254. https://ajindex.com/articles/997038

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Ashforth, B. E. ve F. Mael (1989), “Social Identity Theory and The Organizations”, Academy of Management Review, 14, pp:20-39.
  2. Argenti, Paul A., Bob Druckenmiller, (2004), “Reputation and the Corporation
  3. Brand”, Corporate Reputation Review, 6 (4), pp:368–274. Arslantaş, C. Cüneyt, (2007), “Dönüşümcü Liderliğin Psikolojik Güçlendirme ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkisi”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt:40 Sayı:4 ss. 81-101.
  4. Avolio, B. J., B. M., Bass, D. I., Jung, (1999), “Reexamining the components of transformational and transactional leadership nursing the multifactor leadership
  5. Questionnaire” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, pp: −462. Bhattacharya, C.B, H., Roa, M.A. Glynn, (1995), “Understanding The Bond Of
  6. Identification: An Investigation Of Its Correlates Amang Art Museum Members”, Journal Of Marketing, pp: 46-57
  7. Bass, B.M., (1985), Leadership And Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: FreePress.
  8. Baron, R. M., ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182
  9. Burns, J.M., (1978), Ledership. New York: Harper&Row.
  10. Epitropaki, Olga, Robin Martin; (2005), “The moderating role of individual differences in the relation between transformational/transactional leadership perceptions and organizational identification”, The Leadership Quarterly 16 pp: –589
  11. Gotsi, M. and A.M. Wilson, (2001), Corporate reputation: Seeking a definition.
  12. Corporate Communications, 6(1): 24-30
  13. Günbek,Kahraman, (2007), “Örgütsel Özdeşleşme ve Kamu Kesimi Personeli
  14. Üzerine Bir Uygulama”, İnönü Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Malatya, ss: 1-114
  15. İşcan, Ömer Faruk, (2006), Dönüştürücü/Etkileşimci Liderlik Algısı ve Örgütsel
  16. Özdeşleşme İlişkisinde Bireysel Farklılıkların Rolü”, Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi (11), ss: 160-177
  17. Karakılıç, Yörük Nilüfer, (2005), “Kurumsal İtibarın Müşteri Tercihleri Üzerine
  18. Etkileri: Afyon’da Perakende Sektöründe Faaliyet Gösteren İşletmeler Üzerine Bir Araştırma” Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, C.VII, S.2, ss:181- Kenny DA, DA Kashy, N Bolger ve ark. (1998), “Data Analysis in
  19. Socialpsychology”, Editörler: Gibert, Fiske S.T., G.Lindzey., The Handbook Of Social Psychology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, s.203-227. Mael, F. ve L.E. Tetrick (1992) “Identifying Organizational Identification”,
  20. Educational and Psychological Measurement, pp:52. Mael, F. A. ve B.E. Ashforth (1992), “Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test ofthe reformulated model of organizational identification”, Journal of
  21. Organizational Behavior, 13(2), pp:103–123. Öz, Ela Ünler ve Füsun Bulutlar (2009), “Algılanan Kurumsal İtibar ve Kurumdan Ayrılma Niyeti Arasındaki İlişkide Bir Ara Değişken Olarak
  22. Özdeşleşmenin Rolü”, Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, cilt 9, sayı 1, ss:35-52
  23. Rafferty, A.E. and M.A., Griffin, (2004), “Dimensions of Transformational
  24. Leadership: Conceptual and Empirical Extensions”, The Leadership Quarterly, (3), pp:329-354
  25. Smidts A., A.T.H, Pruyn, C.B.M. Van Riel; (2001), “The Impact Of Employee
  26. Communication And Perceived External Prestige On Organizational Identification”, Academy Of Management Journal, Vol 49, No 5, pp:1051-1062
  27. Şatır, Çiğdem ve Fulya Erendağ Sümer, (2008), “Kurum İtibarının Bileşenleri
  28. Üzerine Bir Araştırma: Sağlık Hizmeti Üreten Bir Kamu Kurumunda İç Paydaşlar İtibarı Nasıl Algılıyor?”, Selçuk Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı:5, ss:15-25
  29. Tak, Bilçin ve Aydem Çiftçioğlu, (2009), “Algılanan Örgütsel Prestij ile Örgütsel
  30. Bağlılık ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Arasındaki İlişkilerin incelenmesine yönelik bir Araştırma”, Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi (18) ss:100-116
  31. Tak, Bilçin ve B.A. Aydemir (2004), “Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Üzerine İki Görgül
  32. Çalışma”, 12. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, Uludağ Üniversitesi, Bursa. Van Knippenberg D. ve, E. C. M. Van Schie, (2000) “Foci and Correlates of
  33. Organizational Identification”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, pp:73. Zhu, Weichun, John J. Sosik, Ronald E. Riggio, Baiyin Yang; (2012),
  34. “Relationships between Transformational and Active Transactional Leadership and Followers’ Organizational Identification: The Role of Psychological Empowerment”, Leadershıp and Organızatıonal İdentıfıcation, pp:186-212
  35. Üzerine Bir Araştırma: Sağlık Hizmeti Üreten Bir Kamu Kurumunda İç Paydaşlar İtibarı Nasıl Algılıyor?”, Selçuk Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı:5, ss:15-25
  36. Bağlılık ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Arasındaki İlişkilerin incelenmesine yönelik bir Araştırma”, Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi (18) ss:100-116