SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 16

The causal relationship between the real exchange rate and export and import in Turkey:1990-2006

Türkiye’de reel döviz kuru ile ihracat ve ithalat arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi: 1990 – 2006

Ekrem GÜL
Aykut EKİNCİ
Pages
165–189
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, our results indicate that there is a unidrectional causality from export and import to the real exchange rates

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we investigate the interactions between the real exchange rates and export and import applying bivariate Granger causality test in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With time-series techniques, it is found that there is a cointegrating relationship between the real exchange rates and export and import.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, our results indicate that there is a unidrectional causality from export and import to the real exchange rates
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the interactions between the real exchange rates and export and import applying bivariate Granger causality test in Turkey. To determine the appropriate Granger causality relations, unit root and cointegtration models are used. With time-series techniques, it is found that there is a cointegrating relationship between the real exchange rates and export and import. On the other hand, our results indicate that there is a unidrectional causality from export and import to the real exchange rates

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de reel döviz kurları ile ihracat ve ithalat arasındaki etkileşim Granger nedensellik testi kullanılarak araştırılmıştır.Granger nedensellik ilişkisini belirlemeden önce, birim kök ve eşbütünleşme analizi yapılmıştır. Zaman serisi teknikleri kullanılarak elde edilen bulgulara göre, reel döviz kurları ile ihracat ve ithalat arasında eşbütünleşme ilişkinin varlığı görülmüştür. Diğer taraftan, reel döviz kuru ile ihracat ve ithalat arasında bulunan nedensellik ilişkisi, ihracat ve ithalattan reel döviz kuruna doğru tek yönlü bir ilişki biçiminde olmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜL, E., EKİNCİ, A. (2022). The causal relationship between the real exchange rate and export and import in Turkey:1990-2006. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 16, 165–189. https://ajindex.com/articles/493629

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Akbostancı,E.(2002), “ Dynamics of the Trade Balance: The Turkish J Curve”, ERC/METU 6. International Conference in Economics, September,Ankara.
  2. Akkaya, Şahin ve M.V. Pazarlıoğlu (1998),
  3. Ekonometri II, Erkam Yayınevi,
  4. İzmir.
  5. Alse, J. Ve Bahmani-Oskooee, M.,(1995), “ Do Devaluations improve or Worsen the Terms of Trade?”, Journal of Economic Studies, Vol.22, No.6, 16-25. Arize,A.C.(1997),” Conditional Exchange Rate Volatility and the Volume of foreign Trade: Evidence from Seven Industrialized Countries.” Southern Economic Journal,64:235-254.
  6. Arize, C.A.,(1995)” The Effect of Exchange- Rate Volatility on U.S. Exports: An Empiricial Investigation”, Southern Economic Journal, Volume 62,Number 1, July 1995,34-43.
  7. Arize, C.A.,(1994)”Cointegration Test of a Long-run Relation between the Real Effective Exchange Rate and the Trade Balance”, Internetional Economic Journal, Vol.8, No:3,1-9. Arize,A.C.,Malindretos,J.&Kasibhatla,K.M.(2003) Does Exchange-rate volitility on export: The case of Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Economics and Finance, 2282-3) Summer/Fall,pp.43-56. Asseery,A. And Peel, D.A. (1991) The Effects of Change rate volatility on exports: an empirical investigation. Southern Economic Journal 62:34-43. Aristotelous,K.,(2001) “ Exchange-rate volatility, Exchange-rate regime,and trade volume: Evidence from the UK-US export function (1989-1999), Economic Letters 72, 87-89. Aydın,M.F.,Çıplak,U.,Yücel,M.E., (2004), “ Export Supply and Import Demand Models for Turkısh Economy”,The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Research Department Working Paper, No.04/09. Backus,D.,” (1998), “ The Japanese Trade Balance: Recent History and Future Perspects”, Japan and The World Economy,10,409-420. Bahmani-Oskoe,,Niroomand,F. (1998) “ Long_run Price Elasticities and The Marshall-Lerner Condition Revisited”, Economic Letters, Vol.61.101-109.
  8. Baldemir, E. Ve Gökalp, F. (1999), “Türkiye’de Döviz Kuru ve Dış Ticaret Hadleri İlişkisinin Ekonometrik Analizi” IV. Ulusal Ekonometri ve İstatistik Sempozyumu Bildirileri,17-40. Bhattacharya,R., (1997), “ The Trade Balance and the Real Exchange Rate: Evidence from a VAR FOR The United States”, Thr Journal of Economics,23,1, 59-71. Boratav,K. Ve Yeldan,E.(2001), Financial Liberalization,Macroeconomic (In) –Stability,and Patterns of Distribution.Working Paper,Bilkent University. Bügük.C.,Işık,M.,Dellal,İ.,ve Allen,A. (2001),” The Impact of Exchange Rate Variability on Agriculture Exports of Developing Countries: The Case of