SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 16

A global problem: Underground economy

Küresel bir sorun: Kayıtdışı ekonomi

Özer ÖZÇELİK
Ramazan KILIÇ
Pages
337–358
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Because of this reason, dimensions of underground economy were analyzed based especially on developed countries, transition countries finally in developing countries criteria.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:When the dimensions of underground economy are taken into attention, it is observed that that problem has been reached to dimensions that threaten all countries in the World.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, related with the dimensions of this problem, in developed countries, in transition countries and in less developed countries, many different studies have been made by different researchers and different methodologies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Because of this reason, dimensions of underground economy were analyzed based especially on developed countries, transition countries finally in developing countries criteria.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

When the dimensions of underground economy are taken into attention, it is observed that that problem has been reached to dimensions that threaten all countries in the World. However, related with the dimensions of this problem, in developed countries, in transition countries and in less developed countries, many different studies have been made by different researchers and different methodologies. This study’s aim is to evaluate these different methodologies together and tried to find some general conclusions. Because of this reason, dimensions of underground economy were analyzed based especially on developed countries, transition countries finally in developing countries criteria.

Özet

Kayıtdışı ekonominin boyutları dikkate alındığında bu sorunun bütün ekonomileri tehdit eder boyutlara ulaştığı gözlemlenmektedir. Ancak bu sorunun boyutları ile ilgili olarak; gelişmiş, geçiş ve az gelişmiş ülkelerde farklı araştırmacılar tarafından farklı yöntemlerle çalışmalar yapılmıştır. Bu çalışma; bu farklı ölçme yöntemlerini bir arada değerlendirerek genel bazı sonuçlara ulaşmayı hedeflemiştir. Bu nedenle öncelikle gelişmiş ülkelerde, sonra geçiş ülkelerinde daha sonra da gelişmekte olan ülke ekonomilerinde kayıtdışı ekonominin boyutları incelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZÇELİK, Ö., KILIÇ, R. (2022). A global problem: Underground economy. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 16, 337–358. https://ajindex.com/articles/493620

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Aktan, C. C. (2000),
  2. Vergi Dışı Piyasa Ekonomisi, Ankara:
  3. TOSYÖV Yayınları Alexeev, M. ve Pyle, W. (2003). “A Note on Measuring the Official Economy in the Former Soviet Republics”, Economics of Transition, 11 (1):153–175
  4. Altuğ, O. (1999).
  5. Kayıtdışı Ekonomi, İkinci Baskı, İstanbul:Türkmen Kitabevi Bajada, C. (2002). “How Reliable are the Estimates of the Underground Economy?”, Economics Bulletin, 3 (14):1–11
  6. Bal, H. (2004). “Geçiş Ülkelerinde Yolsuzluk ve Kayıtdışı Ekonomi: Kırgızistan Bavul Ticareti Örneği”, İktisat, İşletme ve Finans, 219:72–92
  7. Barthelemy, P. (1989). “The Underground Economy in France”, in ed. E. L. Feige, The Underground Economies: Tax Evasion and Information Distortion, Cambridge University Press:281–294
  8. Berger, S. (1986). “The Unrecorded Economy: Concepts, Approach and Preliminary Estimates for Canada, 1981”, in Canadian Statiscal Review, 61:VI-XXVI Bonjean A. C. ve Chambas G. (2003). “Taxing the Urban Unrecorded Economy in Sub–Saharan Africa”, Hard to Tax Conference in Atlanta, May. Bovi, M (2004). “An Improvement of the Tanzi Method for the Estimation of Italian Underground Economy”, Public Economics, 0404009:1–14.
  9. Boyle, G.E. (1984). “In Search of Ireland’s Black Economy”, Irish Banking Review, 4 Brodin, E. (2005). “İsveç Refah Devleti: Kayıp Cennet” (çev.S. Erdal), http://www.canaktan.org/politika/anti-leviathan/diger-yazilar/erdal-isvec-refah.pdf (09.02.2005)
  10. Broesterhuizen, G.A.A.M. (1989). “The Unobserved Economy and the National Accounts in the Netherlands: A Sensitivity Analysis” in ed. E. L. Feige, The Underground Economies: Tax Evasion and Information Distortion, Cambridge University Press.:159-174
  11. Christopoulos, D. K. (2003). “Does Underground Economy Respond Symmetrically to Tax Changes? Evidence from Greece”, Economic Modelling, 20 (3):563–570
  12. Contini, B. (1989) “The Irregular Economy of Italy: A Survey of Contributions” in ed. E. L. Feige, The Underground Economies: Tax Evasion and Information Distortion, Cambridge University Pres: 237–250
  13. Çetintaş, H. ve Vergil, H. (2003), “Türkiye’de Kayıtdışı Ekonominin Tahmini”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 4 (1):15–30
  14. Derdiyok, T. (1993). “Türkiye’nin Kayıtdışı Ekonomisinin Tahmini”, Türkiye İktisat Dergisi, 14:54-63
  15. Djankov, S., Lieberman, I., Mukherjee, J.,ve Nenova T. (2003). “Going Informal: Benefits and Costs”, in Boyan Belev (ed.), The Informal Economy in the EU Accession Countries, Sofia:Center for the Study of Democracy: 63-80
  16. Eilat Y. ve Zinnes C. (2002). “Shadow Economy in