Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 24

The main determinants of foreign direct Investment flows to Turkey: An Econometric Analysis for the period 1990-2006

Türkiye'de doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımlarının temel belirleyicileri:1990-2006 dönemine ilişkin ekonometrik analiz

Pages
253–268
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Estimation results of the model in which GDP, labor cost, inflation and openness are independent variables indicates that foreign direct investment flows to Turkey is positively effected by GDP and openness while it is negatively effected by labour cost and inflation variables.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main objective of this study is to establish the determinants of foreign direct investment flows to Turkey for the period 1990-2006 and to make policy proposals for the future.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this framework, the long-term foreign direct investment is estimated by the use of Johansen’s multivariate co-integration method, and by this way, the short-term relationships are searched for by Error-Correction Model.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Estimation results of the model in which GDP, labor cost, inflation and openness are independent variables indicates that foreign direct investment flows to Turkey is positively effected by GDP and openness while it is negatively effected by labour cost and inflation variables.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to establish the determinants of foreign direct investment flows to Turkey for the period 1990-2006 and to make policy proposals for the future. In this framework, the long-term foreign direct investment is estimated by the use of Johansen’s multivariate co-integration method, and by this way, the short-term relationships are searched for by Error-Correction Model. Estimation results of the model in which GDP, labor cost, inflation and openness are independent variables indicates that foreign direct investment flows to Turkey is positively effected by GDP and openness while it is negatively effected by labour cost and inflation variables.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, 1990-2006 dönemine ilişkin Türkiye’de doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımlarının belirleyicilerini tespit etmek ve tahmin sonuçlarından hareketle politika önerisinde bulunmaktır. Bu çerçevede, Johansen çoklu eşbütünleşme tahmin yöntemi kullanılarak uzun dönem doğrudan yabancı sermaye girişine ilişkin model tahmin edilmiş ve buradan hareketle Hata Düzeltme Modeli yardımıyla kısa dönem ilişkileri araştırılmıştır. Açıklayıcı değişken olarak GSYİH, işgücü maliyeti, enflasyon ve dışa açıklık oranının yer aldığı modelin tahmin edilmesi ile Türkiye’de doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımlarının GSYİH ve dışa açıklık oranından pozitif, işgücü maliyeti ve enflasyon değişkenlerinden ise negatif olarak etkilendiği gözlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TARI, R., BIDIRDI, H. (2022). The main determinants of foreign direct Investment flows to Turkey: An Econometric Analysis for the period 1990-2006. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 24, 253–268. https://ajindex.com/articles/493465

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. ALICI, A. A. ve UCAL, M. Ş. (2003). “Foreign Direct Investment, Exports And Output Growth Of Turkey: Causality Analysis”, European Trade Study Group (ETSG) Fifth Annual Conference, (11-13 September 2003 in Madrid University): 1-17
  2. BAJO-RUBIA, O. and SOSVILLA-RIVERO, S. (1994). “An Economic Analysis of Foreign Direct Investment in Spain,”, Southern Economic Journal, 61(1): 104-117.
  3. BILLINGTON, N. (1999). “The Location of Foreign Direct Investment: An Empirical Analysis”, Applied Economics, 31(1): 65-76.
  4. BOUOIYOUR, J. (2003). “The Determining Factors of Foreign Direct Investment in Morocco,” http://www.mafhoum.com/press6/172E12.pdf, (15.09. 2008).
  5. BOZKURT, H. ( 2007).
  6. Zaman Serileri Analizi, Bursa: Ekin Kitabevi.
  7. CANDEMİR, A. (2006). Türkiye’de Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımlarını Etkileyen Faktörler: Bir Uygulama, Cilt I, Yased Yayınları.
  8. CHAKRABARTI, A. (2001). “The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: Sensivity Analyses of Cross-Country Regressions” Kyklos, 54: 89-114.
  9. DEICHMANN, J., KARIDIS, S. and SAYEK, S. (2003). “Foreign Direct Investment In Turkey: Regional Determinants”, Applied Economics, 35: 1767–1778.
  10. DICKEY, D. A. and FULLER, W. A. (1979). “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Journal of American Statistical Association, 74(366): 427-431.
  11. DICKEY, D. A. and FULLER, W. A. (1981). “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Econometrica, 49(4): 1057-1072.
  12. DPT (2008). Temel Göstergeler, http://ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/teg/2008/ 01/tv. 22.xls (04.05.2008)
  13. DUNNING, J. H. (1988). “The Theory of International Production”, The International Trade Journal, 3(1): 21-66.
  14. DURAN, M. (2002). Türkiye’de Yatırımlara Sağlanan Teşvikler ve Etkinliği, Ankara:
  15. Hazine Müsteşarlığı Yayını. DURSUN, G. (2004). Yabancı Doğrudan Yatırımlar ve Belirleyicileri; Türkiye Analizi (1981-2003), (Basılmamış Doktora Tezi), Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. EDWARDS, S. (1990). “Capital Flows, Foreign Direct Investment, and Debt- Equity Swaps in Developing Countries”, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No: 3497. EFE, B.(2002). Küreselleşme Sürecinde Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımlarının Analizi: İzmir Örneği, İzmir:
  16. İzmir Ticaret Odası Yayını. ENDERS, W. (1995).
  17. Applied Econometric Time Series, New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc. ENGLE, R. F. and GRANGER, C. W. J. (1987). “Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing”, Econometrica, 55(2):