Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 25

The analysis with error correcton modelling of relationship between electricity consumption, employment and economic growth in Turkey

Türkiye'de elektrik tüketimi, istihdam ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişkinin hata düzeltme modeliyle analizi

Pages
61–68
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study it was found that bidirectional causal relationship between employment and GNP in the short and long-run.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Consumption of electricity has been known in many countries to be correlated with economic activities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The reasons for increase of electricity demand are higher living standards and industrialization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study it was found that bidirectional causal relationship between employment and GNP in the short and long-run.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Consumption of electricity has been known in many countries to be correlated with economic activities. The reasons for increase of electricity demand are higher living standards and industrialization. Like in other developing countries, in Turkey, the demand for energy and electricity is growing rapidly due to social and economic developments and increase of the population of the country. In this paper, the Granger causality between electricity consumption, employment and Gross National Product is examined for Turkey using annual data covering the period 1970-2006. As economic growth, employment and electricity consumption variables used in empirical analysis have same order of integration (I(1)), Granger causality test is employed. In this study it was found that bidirectional causal relationship between employment and GNP in the short and long-run. In addition to, unidirectional causality running from GNP and employment to electricity consumption exists in the short and long-run.

Özet

Elektrik tüketiminin pek çok ülkede ekonomik aktivitelerle ilişkili olduğu bilinmektedir. Elektiriğe olan talebin sebebi yüksek yaşam standartları ve sanayileşmedir. Diğer gelişmiş ülkelerde olduğu gibi Türkiye’de de enerjiye ve elektriğe olan yüksek talebin nedeni, ülke nüfusundaki artış ve, sosyal ve ekonomik gelişmelerin hızla artmasındandır. Bu makalede, Türkiye’nin 1970-2006 dönemindeki yıllık verilerle elektrik tüketimi, istihdam ve GSMH arasındaki nedensellik araştırıldı. Yapılan analiz sonunda elektrik tüketimi, istihdam ve GSMH değişkenleri aynı derecede (I(1)) bütünleşik olduklarından Granger nedensellik testi uygulandı. Çalışmada, kısa ve uzun dönemde, ekonomik büyümeden ve istihdamdan elektrik tüketimine tek yönlü bir nedesellik tespit edilirken, istihdam ve büyüme arasında iki yönlü nedensellik bulundu.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKTAŞ, C. (2022). The analysis with error correcton modelling of relationship between electricity consumption, employment and economic growth in Turkey. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 25, 61–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/493422

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akarca, A. ve Long T.V (1980), “On the Relationship Between Energy and GNP: A Re-Examination”, Journal of Energy and Development, 5, 326-331.
  2. Akarca, A.T., Long, T.V., (1979), “Energy and Employment: A Time Series Analysis of the Causal Relationship”, Resource and Energy, 2, 151-62.
  3. Altınay, G., Karagöl, E., (2005), “Electrictiy Consumption and Economic Growth: Evidence From Turkey”, Energy Economics 27, 849-856.
  4. Chang, T., Wenshwo, F.ve Li-Fang, W. (2001), “Energy Consumption, Employment, Output and Temporal Causality: Evidence From Taivan Based on Cointegration and Error-Correction Modelling Techniques”, Applied Economics, 33, 1045- 1056. Dickey, D. ve Fuller, W.A. (1981), “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with A Unit Root”, Econometrica, 49, 1057-1072.
  5. Dickey, D.A. ve Fuller, W.A (1979), “Distribution of the Esti¬mators for Autoregressive Time Series with A Unit Root”, Journal of American Statistical Association, 74, 427-431.
  6. Engle, R. F. ve Granger C.W.J., (1987), “Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing”, Econometrica, 55 (2): 251-276.
  7. Erol, U. ve Yu, E.S (1987), “Time Series Analysis of the Causal Relationships Between US Energy and Employment”, Resources Energy, 9, 75-89.
  8. Ghosh, S. (2002), “Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth in India”, Energy Policy, 30, 125–129. Granger C.W.J., ve Newbold, P., (1974), “Spurios Regressions in Econometrics”, Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111–120.
  9. Güneş, S., (2007), “İmalat Sektöründe Verimlilik ve Reel Ücret İlişkisi: Bir Koentegrasyon Analizi”, Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 14, 2, 276-287.
  10. Johansen, S. (1988), “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231-254.
  11. Jumbe, C.B.L. (2004), “Cointegration and Causality Between Electricity Consumption and GDP: Empirical Evidence From Malawi”, Energy Economics, 26, 61-68.
  12. Kar, M. ve Kınık, E. (2008), “Türkiye’de Elektrik Tüketimi Çeşitleri ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişkinin Ekonometrik Bir Analizi”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, İ.İ.B.F. Dergsi, 2, 333-353.
  13. Kraft, J. ve Kraft, A. (1978), “On the Relationship Between Energy and GNP”, Journal of Energy and Development, 3, 401-403.
  14. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C., Schmidt, P. ve Shin, Y. (1992), “Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity Against the Alternative of A Unit Root”, Journal of Econometrics, 1, 159- 178. Lee, C.C., (2005), “Energy Consumption and GDP in Developing C