SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 26

Problem of migration flows from transition economies to the old members of the European Union

Geçiş ekonomilerinden Avrupa Birliği'nin eski üyelerine göç sorunu

Betül DURAL YÜCE
Pages
91–100
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In fact, due to the low fertility and ageing population, EU is in the need of workers migration in order to sustain its growth level and increase the welfare.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The expected migration flows from the Central and Eastern European countries that joined in the European Union in 1st May 2004 and 1st January 2007 had caused fears in those old members of the union.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thus, they restrict access to their labour markets to workers from Eastern Europe for seven years of transitional period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In fact, due to the low fertility and ageing population, EU is in the need of workers migration in order to sustain its growth level and increase the welfare.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The expected migration flows from the Central and Eastern European countries that joined in the European Union in 1st May 2004 and 1st January 2007 had caused fears in those old members of the union. Thus, they restrict access to their labour markets to workers from Eastern Europe for seven years of transitional period. Despite those fears, they did not experience massive migration flows. In fact, due to the low fertility and ageing population, EU is in the need of workers migration in order to sustain its growth level and increase the welfare.

Özet

1 Mayıs 2004 ve 1 Ocak 2007 tarihlerinde Avrupa Birliği(AB)’ne üye olan Merkezi ve Doğu Avrupa ülkelerinden AB’nin eski üyelerine doğru gerçekleşmesi beklenen göç, bu ülkelerde korkulara sebep olmuştur. Bu sebepten yeni üyelerden gelmesi beklenen işgücü göçüne yönelik geçiş süreleri uygulamalarıyla bazı kısıtlamalara gidilmiştir. Ancak korkulanın aksine, çok yoğun bir göç dalgası yaşanmamıştır. Üstelik düşük doğurganlık sebebiyle yaşlanan ve nüfusu azalan AB’nin refah seviyesini devam ettirebilmek için bu göçmenlere ihtiyacı vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜCE, B. D. (2022). Problem of migration flows from transition economies to the old members of the European Union. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 26, 91–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/493339

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. AKBAŞ, Arif., (2008). “AB Ülkelerindeki işgücü ve potansiyelleri” http://www.stratejikboyut.com/makale/ab-ulkelerindeki-is-gucu-ve-potansiyelleri-315.html
  2. BIJWAARD, Govert E.,(2009) “Labour market Status and Migration Dynamics”, Econometric Institute Report, EI, 2009-25
  3. BISHOP, Kate. (2004) “Employment and Unemployment in the New EU Member Countries”, Labour Market Trends, July 2004, 112,7;ABI/INFORM Global BREITENFELLNER,Andreas., CUARESMA, Jesus Crespo., MOOSLECHNER, Peter ve GRÜNWALD,Doris Ritzberger. (2008). “The Impact of EU Enlargement in 2004 and 2007 on FDI and Migration Flows-Gravity Analysis of Factor Mobility”, Monetary Policy&The Economy, Q2/2008
  4. CASI, Laura (2009). “Enhancing Trade Through Migration-A Gravity Model of the Network Effect”, No 35, ISLA Working Papers, ISLA, Centre for research on Latin American Studies and Transition Economies, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy, http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:slp:islawp:islawp35.
  5. ENGFER, Uwe ve SENG, Thomas. (1997).“Differentiation of the Standard of Living in Eastern Central Europe and East-West Migration”, Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt und Berufs forschung,vol.30, issue 3: pages 601-611, abstract. EREN, Ercan ve BİLDİRİCİ, Melike. (2001) “Post Sosyalist Ülkelerde Geçiş Sorunları: Başarı ve Başarısızlıklar”, İktisat İşletme ve Finans Dergisi, Mart 2001
  6. GENÇLER, Ayhan.(2006). “Avrupa Birliği’nin Göç Politikası”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi, Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları, 49. Kitap, 2006
  7. HUSZ, Dora (2002). “Free Movement of Workers: Why so Sensitive? An analysis of factors standing behind the transitional period to be imposed on the movement of labour from the Central and Eastern European countries after their accession to the EU”. E-journal, ISSN 1505-1161.
  8. KARLUK, S. Rıdvan, (2005). Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye, 8. Bası, İstanbul:
  9. Beta KIM, Mina.(2008). “Regional Integration and Adjustment Costs”, http://www.wlu.ca/viessmann/WLU_08/Kim.pdf
  10. LUNDBORG, Per ve RECHEA, Calin.(2002). “ Will Transition Countries Benefit or Lose from the Brain Drain?”, FIEF Working Paper Series, 2002, No.187 PUGA, Diego. (2002). “European regional policies in light of recent location theories”. Journal of Economic Geography 2 YİĞİT, Dilek, “Avrupa Birliği’nde İşçilerin Serbest Dolaşımı”, http://www.treasury.gov.tr/irj/go/km/docs/documents/Hazine%20Web/Arastirma%20Yayin/%c3%87al%c4%b1%c5%9fma%20Raporlar%c4%b1/Avrupa%20Birli%c4%9fi'nde%20%c4%b0%c5%9fcilerin%20Serbest%20Dola%c5%9f%c4%b1m%c4%b1.pdf YÜCE DU