SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 26

GEÇİŞ EKONOMİLERİNDEN AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ'NİN ESKİ ÜYELERİNE GÖÇ SORUNU

Betül Yüce Dural
Pages
—
Publication Date
2015-06-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In fact, due to the low fertility and ageing population, EU is in the need of workers migration in order to sustain its growth level and increase the welfare

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The expected migration flows from the Central and Eastern European countries that joined in the European Union in 1st May 2004 and 1st January 2007 had caused fears in those old members of the union.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thus, they restrict access to their labour markets to workers from Eastern Europe for seven years of transitional period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In fact, due to the low fertility and ageing population, EU is in the need of workers migration in order to sustain its growth level and increase the welfare
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Geçiş ekonomileri · yasa dışı göç · beyin göçü

Abstract

The expected migration flows from the Central and Eastern European countries that joined in the European Union in 1st May 2004 and 1st January 2007 had caused fears in those old members of the union. Thus, they restrict access to their labour markets to workers from Eastern Europe for seven years of transitional period. Despite those fears, they did not experience massive migration flows. In fact, due to the low fertility and ageing population, EU is in the need of workers migration in order to sustain its growth level and increase the welfare

Özet

1 Mayıs 2004 ve 1 Ocak 2007 tarihlerinde Avrupa Birliği(AB)’ne üye olan Merkezi ve Doğu Avrupa ülkelerinden AB’nin eski üyelerine doğru gerçekleşmesi beklenen göç, bu ülkelerde korkulara sebep olmuştur. Bu sebepten yeni üyelerden gelmesi beklenen işgücü göçüne yönelik geçiş süreleri uygulamalarıyla bazı kısıtlamalara gidilmiştir. Ancak korkulanın aksine, çok yoğun bir göç dalgası yaşanmamıştır. Üstelik düşük doğurganlık sebebiyle yaşlanan ve nüfusu azalan AB’nin refah seviyesini devam ettirebilmek için bu göçmenlere ihtiyacı vardır

🔖

Cite This Article

Dural, B. Y. (2015). GEÇİŞ EKONOMİLERİNDEN AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ'NİN ESKİ ÜYELERİNE GÖÇ SORUNU. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı: 26. https://ajindex.com/articles/1387770

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. AKBAŞ, Arif., (2008). “AB Ülkelerindeki işgücü ve potansiyelleri” http://www.stratejikboyut.com/makale/ab-ulkelerindeki-is-gucu-ve-potansiyelleri-315.html
  2. BIJWAARD, Govert E.,(2009) “Labour market Status and Migration Dynamics”, Econometric Institute Report, EI, 2009-25
  3. BISHOP, Kate. (2004) “Employment and Unemployment in the New EU Member Countries”, Labour Market
  4. Trends, July 2004, 112,7;ABI/INFORM Global
  5. BREITENFELLNER,Andreas., CUARESMA, Jesus Crespo., MOOSLECHNER, Peter ve GRÜNWALD,Doris Ritzberger. (2008). “The Impact of EU Enlargement in 2004 and 2007 on FDI and Migration Flows-Gravity Analysis of Factor Mobility”, Monetary Policy&The Economy, Q2/2008
  6. CASI, Laura (2009). “Enhancing Trade Through Migration-A Gravity Model of the Network Effect”, No 35, ISLA
  7. EREN, Ercan ve BİLDİRİCİ, Melike. (2001) “Post Sosyalist Ülkelerde Geçiş Sorunları: Başarı ve Başarısızlıklar”,
  8. İktisat İşletme ve Finans Dergisi, Mart 2001
  9. GENÇLER, Ayhan.(2006). “Avrupa Birliği’nin Göç Politikası”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi, Sosyal
  10. Siyaset Konferansları, 49. Kitap, 2006
  11. HUSZ, Dora (2002). “Free Movement of Workers: Why so Sensitive? An analysis of factors standing behind the transitional period to be imposed on the movement of labour from the Central and Eastern European countries after their accession to the EU”. E-journal, ISSN 1505-1161.
  12. KARLUK, S. Rıdvan, (2005). Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye, 8. Bası, İstanbul: Beta
  13. KIM, Mina.(2008). “Regional Integration and Adjustment Costs”, http://www.wlu.ca/viessmann/WLU_08/Kim.pdf
  14. LUNDBORG, Per ve RECHEA, Calin.(2002). “ Will Transition Countries Benefit or Lose from the Brain Drain?”,
  15. FIEF Working Paper Series, 2002, No.187
  16. PUGA, Diego. (2002). “European regional policies in light of recent location theories”. Journal of Economic Geography 2
  17. YİĞİT, Dilek, “Avrupa Birliği’nde İşçilerin Serbest Dolaşımı”, http://www.treasury.gov.tr/irj/go/km/docs/documents/Hazine%20Web/Arastirma%20Yayin/%c3%87al%c4%b1%c5 %9fma%20Raporlar%c4%b1/Avrupa%20Birli%c4%9fi'nde%20%c4%b0%c5%9fcilerin%20Serbest%20Dola%c5%9 f%c4%b1m%c4%b1.pdf YÜCE DURAL, Betül. (2007). Geçiş Ekonomileri-Plandan Piyasaya, İstanbul: Beta yayınevi
  18. Standard Eurobarometer 66: Autumn 2006
  19. Euractiv – AB haber ve politika portalı(2008) http://www.euractiv.com.tr/abnin-gelecegi/article/bulgaristan-ve- romanyadan-ab-ulkelerine-isci-gocu-yok
  20. International Organization for Migration, (2009) http://www.iom.int/jahia/Jahia/about-migration/lang/en
  21. “Free movement of labour in the EU-25”, http://www.euractiv.com/en/enlargement/free-movement-labour-eu-25/article-129648
  22. “Free movement of labour in the EU-27”, http://www.euractiv.com/en/mobility/free-movement-labour-eu-27/article- 129648
  23. BREITENFELLNER,Andreas., CUARESMA, Jesus Crespo., MOOSLECHNER, Peter ve GRÜNWALD,Doris Ritzberger. (2008). “The Impact of EU Enlargement in 2004 and 2007 on FDI and Migration Flows-Gravity Analysis of Factor Mobility”, Monetary Policy&The Economy, Q2/2008