Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

KRİZDEN İNNOVASYONA: GÜNEY KORE ÖRNEĞİ

Pages
239–254
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In spite of experiencing both Korean War and Asian Financial Crisis, Korea changed them to an opportunity for economic development

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:South Korea has developed rapidly after the Korean War and is a member of both G-20 and OECD now.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Import substitution policy was followed after the war and export oriented development strategy was implemented after the 1960s.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In spite of experiencing both Korean War and Asian Financial Crisis, Korea changed them to an opportunity for economic development
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kore · Ekonomik Kalkınma · İnnovasyon

Abstract

South Korea has developed rapidly after the Korean War and is a member of both G-20 and OECD now. Import substitution policy was followed after the war and export oriented development strategy was implemented after the 1960s. Development incentives were supplied mainly to the big family enterprises (chaebols) that were loyal to government policies and strategies. It is obvious that developing industries in the 70’s was heavy industry and chemical industry, automotive and electronics in the 80’s and information technologies during 90’s. South Korea has followed different strategies to overcome 1997 Asian Finacial Crisis and turn it to an opportunity for innovative policies. Big Korean family holdings (Chaebols) that was difficult to control, became a burden to national economy and diversified in many areas were restructured. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), especially the entrepreneurial venture businesses, that were aiming to conduct technological research and development, were activily supported by government. In spite of experiencing both Korean War and Asian Financial Crisis, Korea changed them to an opportunity for economic development

Özet

Kore harbinden sonra hızla gelişen Güney Kore, bugün hem OECD, hem de G-20 üyesidir. Savaş sonrasında ithalat ikamesine yönelik bir politika izlenmişken, 1960’lardan sonra ihracat eksenli bir kalkınma stratejisi izlendi. Girişimcilikleriyle öne çıkmış ve hükümet planlamalarına sadık aile şirketlerine (chaebol) sağlanılan teşviklerle kalkınma tercih edildi. 1970’lerde ağır sanayi ve kimya sanayi, 80’li yıllarda otomotiv ve elektronik, 90’lı yıllardan itibaren ise bilişime doğru kayan bir süreç izlendi. Güney Kore, 1997 yılında Asya Ekonomik Krizini aşmak ve bunu bir fırsata çevirmek için değişik stratejiler izledi. Çok büyümüş, pek çok alanda farklılaşmış, kontrol edilmesi zorlaşan ve bu halleriyle ülke ekonomisine yük hale gelmeye başlayan chaeboller yeniden yapılandırıldı. Küçük ve orta ölçekli işletmeler (KOBİ’ler), özelliklede teknolojik araştırma geliştirme yapmayı hedefleyen girişimci işletmeler (Venture Business) desteklenerek gelişmeleri sağlandı. Hem Kore Savaşını, hem de Asya Ekonomik Krizini yaşayan Kore, krizleri fırsatlara çevirmesini bildi

🔖

Cite This Article

ATAY, E. (2022). KRİZDEN İNNOVASYONA: GÜNEY KORE ÖRNEĞİ. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 239–254. https://ajindex.com/articles/493215

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Amsden, Alice. (1989), Asia’s Next Giant, Oxford University Press,
  2. New York Baygan, Günseli. (2003),
  3. Venture Capital Policies in Korea, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2003/02. OECD Publishing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/248000716362
  4. Chang, Yunsik. (2008),
  5. Korea Confronts Globalization, Taylor & Francis, London. Choi, H.J., (1976), Selection of Papers on the Korean Economy, Yonsei University Press, Seoul (Korece). Congressional Budget Office Memorandum (1997), The Role of Foreign Aid in Development: South Korea and the Philippines. Washington: USA Congressional Budget Office, http://www.cbo.gov/publication/14518
  6. Chung, H.H. (2007), Lessons from the Korean Venture Industry Development, World Bank Working Paper, 39379. Chung, K. H., Lee, H.C. and Jung, K.H. (1997), Korean Management: Global Strategy and Cultural Transformation, New York: Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York. Chung, S. (1999), Korean Innovation Policies for Small and Medium Sized Enterprises, Science and Public Policy, 26(2), 70-82
  7. Chung, S. (2010),
  8. Innovation, Competitiveness and Growth: Korean Experiences, Annual Word Bank Conference on Development Economics 2010,
  9. Global. Cyhn, J.W. (2002), Technology Transfer and International Production: The Development of the Electronics Industry in Korea, Edward Elgar Publishing, North Hampton. Diaz, L. M. (2009), Globalizing in Hard Times: The Politics of Banking-Sector Opening in the Emerging World, Cornell University Press,
  10. New York. Eriksson, S. (2005), Innovation Policies in South Korea and Taiwan, Swedish Agency for Innovation Systems, Jonkoping. Gregory, G. Harvie, C. ve Lee, H.H., (2002), Korean SMEs in the Wake of the Financial Crisis: Strategies, Constraints, and Performance in a Global Economy. University of Wollongong: Working Paper, 02-12.
  11. Hahm, J.H. (2003), “The Government, the Chaebol and Financial Institutions before the Economic Crisis”, Edts: Haggard, S. Lim, W. and Kim, E., Economic Crisis and Corporate Restructuring in Korea: Reforming the Chaebol, Cambridge University Press,
  12. Cambridge. Hamilton, G.G. Feenstra, R. Choe, W. Kim, C.K. ve Lim, E.M. (2000) Neither States Nor Markets: The Role of Economic Organization in Asian Development. International Sociology, 15(2): 288–305.
  13. Harvie, C. and Lee, B.C. (2002), the Role of SMEs in National Economies in East Asia, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham. Hiemenz, U. (1999), Growth and Competition in the New Global Economy, OECD Publishing, Paris. Hobday, M. Howard, R. ve Jo