SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 45

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MANAGERS’ POWER SOURCES AND EMPLOYEES’ SENSE OF TRUST TO ORGANIZATION

YÖNETİCİNİN GÜÇ KAYNAĞI İLE ÇALIŞANLARIN ÖRGÜTE DUYDUĞU GÜVEN ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Ayşem ÇALIŞKUR
Pages
160–174
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Pearson Correlation Analyze was used to examine the data testing in order to determine the correlation between employees’ power sources perception from manager and sense of trust to organization and the relation between power and trust dimensions

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between managers’ power source and employees’ sense of trust to organization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data has been collected from employees’ working in different organizations, public and private sector in İstanbul (N=152) by “Organizational Power Scale in Schools” and “Organization Oriented Trust Scale”.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Pearson Correlation Analyze was used to examine the data testing in order to determine the correlation between employees’ power sources perception from manager and sense of trust to organization and the relation between power and trust dimensions
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çalışan · güç · güven

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between managers’ power source and employees’ sense of trust to organization. Correlational survey model was used in the study. Data has been collected from employees’ working in different organizations, public and private sector in İstanbul (N=152) by “Organizational Power Scale in Schools” and “Organization Oriented Trust Scale”. Data was analyzed by SPSS 21.0 software programme. Pearson Correlation Analyze was used to examine the data testing in order to determine the correlation between employees’ power sources perception from manager and sense of trust to organization and the relation between power and trust dimensions

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı; yöneticinin kullandığı güç kaynağı ile çalışanların örgüte duydukları güven arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemektir. Araştırmada ilişkisel tarama yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini İstanbul ilinde bulunan farklı örgütlerde kamu ve özel sektörde çalışanlar oluşturmuştur (N=152). Verilen toplanmasında, örneklem grubuna “Okullarda Örgütsel Güç Ölçeği” ve “Kuruma Güven Anketi” uygulanmıştır. Veriler SPSS 21.0 programıyla analiz edilmiştir. Çalışanların yöneticiden algıladıkları güç kaynakları ile örgüte duydukları güven boyutları arasında ilişkileri belirlemek amacıyla Pearson Korelasyon Analizi’nden yararlanılmış ve güç ve güven boyutları arasında ilişkiler belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇALIŞKUR, A. (2022). RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MANAGERS’ POWER SOURCES AND EMPLOYEES’ SENSE OF TRUST TO ORGANIZATION. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 45, 160–174. https://ajindex.com/articles/492863

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Algoe, S.B. (2012). Find, remind and bind: The functions of gratitude in everyday relationship. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 455-469.
  2. Allen, R. W., Madison, D. L., Porter, L. W., Renwick, P. A., Mayes, B. T. (1979). Organizational politics-tactics and characteristics of its actors. California Management Review, 22(1), 77-83.
  3. Altınkurt, Y. ve Yılmaz, K. (2013). Okullarda örgütsel güç ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. E-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(4), 1-17.
  4. Bağcı, Z. ve Bursalı, Y.M. (2011). Yöneticilerin güç kaynaklarının çalışanların örgüte bağlılıkları üzerine etkisi: Çalışanların algılamalarına bağımlı akademik bir inceleme. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9, 9-21.
  5. Bess, J.L. and Dee, J.R. (2012). Understanding college and university organization: Theories for effective policy and practice (2 vol). Sterling VA: Stylus Publishing. Burns, T. and Stalker, G.M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock Publication. Butler, J. K. and Cantrell, R. S. (1984). A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates. Psychological Reports, 55, 19-28.
  6. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara:
  7. Pegem Akademi. Cameron, K.S. (2013). “Advances in positive organizational scholarship”. A.B. Bakker (Edi.), Advances in Positive Organizational Psychology (p.23-44). UK: Emerald Group Publishing. Coburn, C. and Russell, J. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203-2
  8. Colquitt, B. A. Scott, and J. A. LePine (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A Meta-nnalytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909–927.
  9. Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harward University Press.
  10. Dahl, Robert A. (1969). “The Concept of Power”. R. Bell, D.V. Edwards and R.H. Wagner (Eds.), Political Power: A Reader in Thoery and Research (p.80). New York: The Free Press.
  11. Deci, E.L, Connell, J.P. and Ryan, R.M. (1989). Self determination in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74 (4), 580-590.
  12. Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 265–279.
  13. Dunn, J. and Schwetzer, M. (2005). Feeling and believing: The influnce of emotion in trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 736-748. Durukan