SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

EXAMINING INTRINSIC MOTIVATION AND WORK VALUES ACCORDING TO THE JOB AREAS: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTRINSIC MOTIVATION AND WORK VALUES

BELİRLİ MESLEK ALANLARINA GÖRE İÇSEL GÜDÜLENME VE ÇALIŞMA DEĞERLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ: İÇSEL GÜDÜLENME VE ÇALIŞMA DEĞERLERİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Ayşem ÇALIŞKUR
Pages
2–31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it is found that there are significant relationships between intrinsic motivation and work value dimensions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to investigate the diversification of intrinsic motivation and work values according to some job areas and determine the relationship between intrinsic motivation and work values.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this research, data have been collected from employees working in three different firms and five different job areas in İstanbul (N=171).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it is found that there are significant relationships between intrinsic motivation and work value dimensions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the diversification of intrinsic motivation and work values according to some job areas and determine the relationship between intrinsic motivation and work values. In this research, data have been collected from employees working in three different firms and five different job areas in İstanbul (N=171). Intrinsic motivation and work value dimensions are evaluated and data is analyzed by SPSS 21.0 software programme. As a result, it is found that some intrinsic motivation and work value dimensions become diversified in the five job areas which are examined in this study. In addition, it is found that there are significant relationships between intrinsic motivation and work value dimensions.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı; belirli meslek alanlarına göre içsel güdülenme ve çalışma değerlerinin farklılaşmasının incelenmesi ve içsel güdülenme ile çalışma amaçlarının ilişkisinin belirlenmesidir. Araştırmadaki veriler İstanbul ilinde bulunan üç ayrı kurumda, beş ayrı meslek alanında çalışan katılımcılardan toplanmıştır (N=171). İçsel güdülenme ve çalışma değeri boyutları değerlendirmeye tabi tutulmuş ve veriler SPSS 21.0 programında analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçta; bu çalışmada incelenen beş ayrı meslek alanına göre bazı içsel güdülenme boyutları ve çalışma değeri boyutlarının farklılaştığı belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, içsel güdülenme boyutları ile çalışma değerleri boyutları arasında anlamlı ilişkiler elde edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇALIŞKUR, A. (2014). EXAMINING INTRINSIC MOTIVATION AND WORK VALUES ACCORDING TO THE JOB AREAS: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTRINSIC MOTIVATION AND WORK VALUES. Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 2–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/332533

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Anderson, N. (1961). Workandleisure. London: Routledge & Kegan. Borg, I. (1986). “A Cross-culturalreplication on Elizur’s Facets of Work Values”. Multivariate Behaviour Research, 21, 401-410.
  2. Çalışkur, A. ve Demirhan, A. (2013). “İçsel Güdülenme Envanteri Dilsel Eşdeğerlik, Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik Çalışması”. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi’nde (basıma kabul edilmiştir). Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behaviour. New York: Plenum Press.
  3. Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (1991). “A Motivation Aprroach to Self”. R. A. Dienstbier (Eds.), Perspectives on Motivation, Nebraska Symposium Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press, 237-289.
  4. Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (2002). “An Overview of Self-determination Theory”. E. L. Deci ve R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of Self-determination Research, Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 3-33.
  5. De Charms, R. (1968). Personal Causation: The Internal Affective Determinants of Behaviour. New York: Academic Press.
  6. Dinger, M., Thatcher, J. B., Stepina, L. P. (2010). “A Study of Work-family Conflict Among IT Professionals: Job Characteristics, Individual Values, and Management Practices”. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 20(1), 91-121.
  7. Donald, M. N. ve Havighurst, R. J. (1959). “The Meaning of Leisure”. Social Forces, 7, 355-360.
  8. Elizur, D.,Borg, I., Hunt, R. ve Beck, I. M. (1991). “The Structure of Work Values: A Cross-cultural Comparasion”. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 12, 21-38.
  9. Elizur, D. (1994). “Gender and Work Values: A Comparative Analysis”. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134(2), 201-212.
  10. Elizur, D. Ve Sagie, A. (1999). “Facets of Personal Values: A Structural Analysis of Life and Work Values”. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 73-87.
  11. Feather, N. T. (1975). Values in Education and Society. New York: The Free Press.
  12. Firth, R. (1948). “Anthropological Background to Work”. Occupational Psychology, 22, 94-102.
  13. Fisher, C. D. (1986). “Organizational Socialization: An Integrative Review”. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 4, 101-145.
  14. Fournet, G. P, Distefano, M. K., Pryer, M. W. (1966). “Job Satisfaction: Issues and Problems”. Personnel Psychology, 19(2), 165-183.
  15. Franco, L. M., Bennett, S. ve Kanfer, R. (2002). “Health Sector Reform and Public Sector Health Sector Worker Motivation: A Conceptual Framework”. Social Science and Medicine. 54, 1255-1266.
  16. Fryer, D. ve Payne, R. (1984). “Proactive Behavio