SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 58

THE IMPACT OF MULTIPLE LEADERSHIP STYLES PERCEIVED BY EMPLOYEES ON EXTRA EFFORT, EFFECTIVENESS AND SATISFACTION

ÇALIŞANLAR TARAFINDAN ALGILANAN ÇOKLU LİDERLİK TARZLARININ EKSTRA ÇABA, ETKİLİLİK VE DOYUM ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: TEKNOGİRİŞİM İŞLETMELERİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Akif TABAK
Bülent AKKAYA
Yeşim KOÇYİĞİT
Pages
185–196
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover it was found that the means of extra effort, effectiveness and satisfaction of the employees with the highest perception of transformational leadership and transactional leadership were higher than the employees with the lowest perception of transformational leadership and transactional leadersh ip.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of transformational leadership, transactional leadership and laissez-free leadership styles on leadership outcome (effectiveness, satisfaction and extra effort) in 46 techno - entrepreneur firms operating in Dokuz Eylül Technology Development Zone (DEPARK).
📊
Key Findings & Data:In March 2017, 136 companies were operating in DEPARK.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover it was found that the means of extra effort, effectiveness and satisfaction of the employees with the highest perception of transformational leadership and transactional leadership were higher than the employees with the lowest perception of transformational leadership and transactional leadersh ip.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of transformational leadership, transactional leadership and laissez-free leadership styles on leadership outcome (effectiveness, satisfaction and extra effort) in 46 techno - entrepreneur firms operating in Dokuz Eylül Technology Development Zone (DEPARK). In March 2017, 136 companies were operating in DEPARK. Of the 136 companies operating, 66 were techno- entrepreneur firms. 46 of these companies were reached and data were gathered from the employees of these 46 companies by questionnaire and then the data were analyzed. Multiple regression analyzes and T-tests were conducted to reach the results. By analyzing the findings obtained from the analyses, it was seen that employees' transformational leader perception affects extra effort, effectiveness and satisfaction significantly, while employees' transactional leader perception just affects extra effort significantly. However employees' laissez-free leader perception affects extra effort, effectiveness and satisfaction insignificantly. Moreover it was found that the means of extra effort, effectiveness and satisfaction of the employees with the highest perception of transformational leadership and transactional leadership were higher than the employees with the lowest perception of transformational leadership and transactional leadersh ip.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı çalışanların dönüştürücü lider, etkileşimci lider ve serbest bırakan lider algılarının ekstra çaba,etkililik ve doyum üzerindeki açıklama gücünü tespit etmektir. (Dokuz Eylül Teknoloji Geliştirme Bölgesi)DEPARK’ta Mart 2017 itibariyle 136 işletme faaliyet göstermektedir. Faaliyet gösteren 136 işletmeden 66’s ıteknogirişim işletmesidir. Bu 66 işletmeden 46’sına ulaşılabilmiş, bu işletmelerin çalışanlarından anket yöntemiyleveriler toplanmış ve analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sonuçlara ulaşabilmek için çoklu regresyon analizleri ve T -testiyapılmıştır. Analizler sonucu elde edilen bulguların incelenmesiyle; çalışanların dönüştürücü lider algısının ekstraçaba, etkililik ve doyumu önemli derecede ve anlamlı olarak etkilediği, etkileşimci liderlik algısının sadece ekstraçaba üzerinde etkisinin olduğu, serbest bırakan lider algısının ekstra çaba, etkililik ve doyum üzerinde anlamlı biretkisinin olmadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca dönüştürüc ü ve etkileşimci lider algısı en yüksek olan çalışanlarınekstra çaba, etkililik ve doyum ortalamalarının, dönüştürücü ve etkileşimci lider algısı en düşük olan çalışanlardandaha fazla olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TABAK, A., AKKAYA, B., KOÇYİĞİT, Y. (2022). THE IMPACT OF MULTIPLE LEADERSHIP STYLES PERCEIVED BY EMPLOYEES ON EXTRA EFFORT, EFFECTIVENESS AND SATISFACTION. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 58, 185–196. https://ajindex.com/articles/492850

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akkaya, B. (2018). Teknogirişim Firmalarındaki Liderlik Tiplerin Firmaların Örgütsel Çevikliğine Etkisi: Teknopark Firmaları Üzerine Bir Araştırma. (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi) İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi,
  2. İzmir.
  3. Alloubani, A. M., Abdelhafiz, I. M., Abughalyun, Y., Edris, E. E. M. & Almukhtar, M. M. (2015). Impact of Leadership Styles on Leadershıp Outcome (Effectıveness, Satisfaction and Extra Effort) in the Private Healthcare Sector in Jordan. European Scientific Journal, (2), 286- 298. Asrar-Ul-Haq, M. & Kuchinke, K. P. (2016). Impact of leadership styles on employees’ attitude towards their leader and performance: Empirical evidence from pakistani banks. Future Business Journal, 2(1), 54-64.
  4. Avolio, B. J. & Bass, B. M. (Eds.) (2001). Developing Potential Across a Full Range of Leadership: Cases on Transactional and Transformational Leadership, PsychologyPres s, USA. Avolio, B. J., Yammarino, F. J. & Bass, B. M. (1991). Identifying Common Methods Variance With Data Collected From A Single Source: An Unresolved Sticky Issue. Journal of Management, 17(3), 571-587.
  5. Bacha, E. & Walker, S. (2013). The Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Followers' Perceptions of Fairness. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(3), 667-680. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1507-z Bass, B. M. (1995). The Meaning of Leadership. İçinde J.Thomas WREN (Ed.), The Leader’s Companion: Insights on Leadership Through The Ages. New York: The Free Press.
  6. Bass, B. M. & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership, 2. Baskı, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Bogler, R., Caspi, A. & Roccas, S. (2013). Transformational and Passive Leadership: An Initia l Investigation of University Instructors as Leaders in a Virtual Learning Environment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(3), 372–392.
  7. Burns, J. M. (1978).
  8. Leadership, New York: Harper & Row. Caillier, J. G. (2014). Toward a Better Understanding of the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership, Public Service Motivation, Mission Valence, and Employee Performance: A Preliminary Study. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), 218-239. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0091026014528478, 15.02.2018
  9. Castillo, J. X & Cano, J. (2004). Factors Explaining Job Satisfaction Among Faculty. Journal of Agricultural Education, 45(3), 65-74.
  10. Cemaloğlu, N. (2007). Okul Yöneticilerinin Liderlik Stillerinin Farklı Değişkenler Açısında n İncelenmesi. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Kış 2007, 5(1), 73-112.
  11. Diker, O.