SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 45

THE EFFECT OF CAPACITY UTILIZATION RATE ON THE CURRENT ACCOUNT BALANCE: PANEL DATA ANALYSIS

KAPASİTE KULLANIM ORANININ CARİ İŞLEMLER DENGESİNE ETKİSİ: PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ

Mustafa ÜNVER
Pages
190–202
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, domestic credits to private sector, real effective exchange rate and dependency ratios have statistically significant and negative effect on current account balance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper examines the impact of output gap on current account balance for 27 countries over 1980–2013 period, using panel data analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, the findings associated with public budget balance, trade openness, financial openness, market capitalization, saving ratio, institutional variables show that there are statistically significant and positive effects on the current account balance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, domestic credits to private sector, real effective exchange rate and dependency ratios have statistically significant and negative effect on current account balance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kapasite Kullanım Oranı · Çıktı Açığı · Cari İşlemler Dengesi

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of output gap on current account balance for 27 countries over 1980–2013 period, using panel data analysis. The paper analyses also the determinants of current account balance. We find that current account balance is negatively correlated with output gap. However, the findings associated with public budget balance, trade openness, financial openness, market capitalization, saving ratio, institutional variables show that there are statistically significant and positive effects on the current account balance. On the other hand, domestic credits to private sector, real effective exchange rate and dependency ratios have statistically significant and negative effect on current account balance.

Özet

Bu çalışma, cari işlemler dengesine çıktı açığının etkisini 27 ülkenin 1980–2013 dönemi yıllık verileri ile panel veri analizi yöntemi kullanılarak açıklamaktadır. Bununla birlikte, çalışma cari işlemler dengesinin belirleyicilerini de analiz etmektedir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre; çıktı açığı ile cari işlemler dengesi arasında negatif yönlü güçlü bir ilişki elde edilmiştir. Ayrıca kamu sektörü bütçe dengesi, ticari açıklık, finansal açıklık, hisse senedi piyasalarında bulunan firmaların piyasa değeri, tasarruf oranı ve kurumsal değişkenler cari işlemler dengesi üzerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ve pozitif yönlü bir etkiye sahip olmuştur. Diğer taraftan; özel sektöre verilen yerli krediler, reel efektif döviz kuru ve bağımlılık oranları cari işlemler dengesi üzerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ve negatif yönlü bir etkiye neden olmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNVER, M. (2022). THE EFFECT OF CAPACITY UTILIZATION RATE ON THE CURRENT ACCOUNT BALANCE: PANEL DATA ANALYSIS. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 45, 190–202. https://ajindex.com/articles/492846

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. ARISTOVNIK, A. (2008), “Short-Term Determinants of Current Account Deficits: Evidence from Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union”, Eastern European Economics, 46(1): 24-42.
  2. BATDELGER, T., & KANDIL, M. (2012), “Determinants of the Current Account Balance in the United States”, Applied Economics, 44(5): 653-669.
  3. BRISSIMIS, S. N., HONDROYIANNIS, G., PAPAZOGLOU, C., TSAVEAS, N. T., & VASARDANI, M. A. (2013), “The CHINN, M. D., & ITO, H. (2002), “Capital Account Liberalization, Institutions and Financial Development: Cross Country Evidence” (No. W8967), National Bureau of Economic Research, http://www.nber.org/papers/w8967, 14.02.2015.
  4. CHINN, M. D., & ITO, H. (2007), “Current Account Balances, Financial Development and Institutions: Assaying the World “Saving Glut”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 26(4): 546-569.
  5. CHINN, M. D., & ITO, H. (2008), “Global Current Account Imbalances: American Fiscal Policy versus East Asian Savings”, Review of International Economics, 16(3): 479-498.
  6. CHINN, M. D., & PRASAD, E. S. (2003), “Medium-Term Determinants of Current Accounts in Industrial and Developing Countries: An Empirical Exploration”, Journal of International Economics, 59(1): 47–76.
  7. FREUND, C. (2005), “Current Account Adjustment in Industrial Countries”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 24(8): 1278-1298.
  8. GEHRINGER, A. (2014), “New Evidence on the Determinants of Current Accounts in the EU”, Empirica, 1-25, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10663-014-9276-9, 19.04.2015.
  9. GIORNO, C., RICHARDSON, P., ROSEVEARE, D., & VAN DEN NOORD, P. (1995), “Estimating Potential Output, Output Gaps and Structural Budget Balances”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 152, OECD Publishing, http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/estimating-potential-output-output-gaps-and-structural-budget- balances_533876774515, 18.04.2015. GOSSÉ, J. B., & SERRANITO, F. (2014), “Long-Run Determinants of Current Accounts in OECD Countries: Lessons for Intra European Imbalances” Economic Modelling, 38: 451-462.
  10. GNIMASSOUN, B. (2015), “The Importance of the Exchange Rate Regime in Limiting Current Account Imbalances in Sub- Saharan African Countries”, Journal of International Money and Finance, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261560615000029, 13.04.2014.
  11. GRUBER, J. W., & KAMIN, S. B. (2007), “Explaining the Global Pattern of Current Account Imbalances”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 26(4): 500-522.
  12. JAHAN, S. & MAHMUD, A. S. (2013