SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 48

VALIDITY OF COMPENSATION HYPOTHESES IN TURKEY: A REGIONAL PANEL DATA ANALYSIS

TELAFİ HİPOTEZİNİN TÜRKİYE'DE GEÇERLİLİĞİ: BÖLGESEL PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ

Güner TUNCER
Pages
144–154
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Panel Pedroni and Kao cointegration test results show that there exists a long run relationship between the variables over the period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this paper is to analyze compensation hypothesis in terms of relationship between trade openness and social security and social solidarity services in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The analysis has been conducted for 26 regions (NUTS-2) over the period 2004-2011.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Panel Pedroni and Kao cointegration test results show that there exists a long run relationship between the variables over the period.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004-2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze compensation hypothesis in terms of relationship between trade openness and social security and social solidarity services in Turkey. The analysis has been conducted for 26 regions (NUTS-2) over the period 2004-2011. Long term relationship between variables is determined with Panel Pedroni and Kao cointegration tests after panel unit root tests of stationaries of series are analyzed. Moreover, direction and magnitude of the long-term relationship is estimated by Panel DOLS. Panel unit root tests show that the variables were non-stationary process in levels but stationary in first difference. The Panel Pedroni and Kao cointegration test results show that there exists a long run relationship between the variables over the period. Besides, Panel DOLS results show that trade openness affects social security and social solidarity services positively both regional and panel wide

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı telafi hipotezini, ticari dışa açıklık ile sosyal güvenlik ve sosyal yardım hizmetleri arasındaki ilişki açısından Türkiye özelinde analiz etmektir. Bu doğrultuda analiz Türkiye özelinde 26 bölge için 2004-2011 yılları açısından test edilmiştir. Çalışmada serilerin durağanlıklarının panel birim kök testleri incelendikten sonra değişkenler arasındaki uzun dönem ilişkisinin varlığı Panel Pedroni ve Kao eşbütünleşme testleriyle tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca söz konusu ilişkinin yönü ve büyüklüğü ise Panel DOLS yöntemiyle tahmin edilmiştir. Panel birim kök testleri serilerin seviyede durağan olmadıklarını fakat birincil farklarında durağan olduklarını göstermektedir. Panel Pedroni ve Kao eşbütünleşme testleri sonucunda serilerin uzun dönemde eşbütünleşik oldukları tespit edilmiştir. Bunun yanında Panel DOLS sonuçları hem bölgesel hem de panel genelinde ticari dışa açıklığın, sosyal güvenlik ve sosyal yardım hizmetleri harcamalarını pozitif yönde etkilediğini göstermektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

TUNCER, G. (2022). VALIDITY OF COMPENSATION HYPOTHESES IN TURKEY: A REGIONAL PANEL DATA ANALYSIS. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 48, 144–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/492796

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Altay, A., & Aysu, A. (2013). Etkinlik ve Telafi Edici Etki Hipotezi: Seçilmiş Ülkeler Üzerine Ampirik Bir İnceleme. TİSK Akademi, 1, 130-154.
  2. Aregbeyen, O., & Ibrahim, T. M. (2014). Trade Openness-Government Size Nexus: Compensation Hypothesis Considered for Nigeria. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 3, 364-372.
  3. Aydogus, I., & Topcu, M. (2013). An Investigation of Co-Integration and Causality between Trade Openness and Government Size in Turkey. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(2), 319-323.
  4. Balle, F., & Vaidya, A. (2002). A Regional Analysis of Openness and Government Size. Applied Economics Letters, 9(5), 289-292.
  5. Benarroch, M., & Pandey, M. (2012). The Relationship Between Trade Openness and Government Size: Does Disaggregating Government Expenditure Matter? Journal of Macroeconomics, 34, 239-252.
  6. Breitung, J. (2000). The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel Data. B. H. Baltagi, T. B. Fomby, & R. C. Hill içinde, Advances in Econometrics: Volume 15 - Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels (s. 161-177). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Cai, W. X., & Zong, J. F. (2008).
  7. FDI, Trade Openness and Fiscal Expenditure Structure in China. Journal of Finance and Economics, 34(8), 88-96.
  8. Cameron, D. (1978). The Expansion of the Public Economy. American Political Science Review, 72(4), 1243-1261.
  9. Choi, I. (2001). Unit Root Tests for Panel Data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 249-272.
  10. Dreher, A., Sturm, J. E., & Ursprung, H. W. (2008). The Impact of Globalization on the Composition of Government Expenditures: Evidence from Panel Data. Public Choice, 134, 263-292.
  11. Gemmell, N., Kneller, R., & Sanz, I. (2008).
  12. Foreign Investment, International Trade and the Size and Structure of Public Expenditures. European Journal of Political Economy, 24, 151-171.
  13. Genç, M. C., & Telatar, O. M. (2015). Telafi Hipotezi Türkiye İçin Geçerli midir? International Conference on Eurasian Economies, (s. 437-444).
  14. Kazan. Hadri, K. (2000). Testing for Stationarity in Heterogeneous Panel Data. The Econometrics Journal, 3(2), 148-161.
  15. Harris, R. D., & Tzavalis, E. (1999). Inference for Unit Roots in Dynamic Panels Where the Time Dimension is Fixed. Journal of Econometrics, 91(2), 201-226.
  16. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53-74.
  17. Jeanneney, S. G., & Hua, P. (2004). Why Do More Open Chinese Provinces Have Bigger Government