Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 47

AVRUPA DA ENTELEKTÜEL KÜLTÜREL TÜKETİM VE SOSYAL PRESTİJ ALGISI

HIGHBROW CULTURAL CONSUMPTION AND THE PERCEPTION OF SOCIAL PRESTIGE IN EUROPE

Pages
122–147
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Lastly, I find that the social prestige perceived through consuming highbrow culture becomes an important predictor of who consumes highbrow culture. is of I

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The association between class and culture as an important way to understand the determinants of individual tasteswell-known.
📊
Key Findings & Data:I contribute to the existing body of knowledge by focusing on taste publics groupsindividuals distinguished by their levels of economic and cultural capital rather than separately dealing with education and family affluence.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Lastly, I find that the social prestige perceived through consuming highbrow culture becomes an important predictor of who consumes highbrow culture. is of I
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The association between class and culture as an important way to understand the determinants of individual tasteswell-known. Although numerous studies have confirmed this association by using education and income as proxies of cultural and economic capital in highbrow cultural consumption at the individual level, cross-national comparisons remain scarce. I contribute to the existing body of knowledge by focusing on taste publics groupsindividuals distinguished by their levels of economic and cultural capital rather than separately dealing with education and family affluence. I examine the extent to which taste publics and specific country characteristics such as a country s population characteristics, its wealth, and its level of cultural funding affect highbrow cultural consumption across European countries. I further test the extent to which the association between taste publics and highbrow cultural consumption is moderated by these country characteristics. Using Eurobarometer (2007) data,show that taste publics have distinct highbrow cultural consumption scores and the association between taste publics and highbrow cultural consumption varies across Europe. Furthermore, I show that highbrow cultural consumption is affected by specific country characteristics. Lastly, I find that the social prestige perceived through consuming highbrow culture becomes an important predictor of who consumes highbrow culture. is of I

Özet

Birey beğenilerinin belirleyici faktörlerini anlamak için sınıf ve kültür arasındaki ilişki önemli bir yöntem olarak bilinir. Birey seviyesindeki entelektüel kültürel tüketimde eğitim ve gelir seviyesini kültürel ve ekonomik sermayenin temsilcisi olarak kullanarak hazırlanan birçok çalışma bu ilişkiyi doğrulamasına rağmen, uluslararası kıyaslamalar yapan çalışmaların sayısı oldukça azdır. Bu çalışma, mevcut literatüre eğitim ve aile servetini ayrı birer etken olarak incelemek yerine beğeni grupları ekonomik ve kültürel sermaye seviyelerine göre ayrışmış birey grupları üzerine odaklanarak katkıda bulunmaktadır. Avrupa ülkelerinde ülkelerin nüfusları, zenginlikleri ve kültürel kaynak yaratma seviyeleri gibi ülkesel özellikleri ile beğeni gruplarının o ülkelerdeki entelektüel kültürel tüketimi ne oranda etkilediklerini incelenmektedir. Ayrıca, beğeni grupları ile entelektüel kültürel tüketim arasındaki ilişkinin ülkesel özellikler tarafından ne oranda ılımlaştırıldığı test edilmektedir. Eurobarometer (2007) veri setini kullanarak, beğeni gruplarının farklı entelektüel kültürel tüketim puanları olduğu ve beğeni grupları ile entelektüel kültürel tüketim arasındaki ilişkinin Avrupa ülkelerinde değişkenlik gösterdiği gösterilmiştir. Buna ek olarak, entelektüel kültürel tüketimin ülkesel özelliklerden de etkilendiği gösterilmiştir. Son olarak, entelektüel kültür tüketim sonucu elde edilen sosyal prestij algısının kimin entelektüel kültür tüketeceğinin önemli bir göstergesi olduğu bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜKSEK, D. A. (2022). AVRUPA DA ENTELEKTÜEL KÜLTÜREL TÜKETİM VE SOSYAL PRESTİJ ALGISI. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 47, 122–147. https://ajindex.com/articles/492753

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Bassili, J. N. (2003). The Minority Slowness Effect: Subtle Inhibitions in the Expression of Views Not Shared by Others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 84(2), 261-276.
  2. Bennett, T., Savage, M., Silva, E., Warde, A. Gayo-Cal, M., & Wright, D. (2009).
  3. Culture, Class, Distinction. London: Routledge. Blasius, J. & Friedrichs, J. (2008). Lifestyles in Distressed Neighborhoods: A Test of Bourdieu’s ‘Taste of Necessity’ Hypothesis. Poetics. 36, 24-44.
  4. Bond, R. & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and Conformity: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) Line Judgment Task. Psychological Bulletin. 119(1), 111-137.
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. London: Routledge. Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J. C. (1977).
  6. Reproduction in Education, Society, and Culture. Sage, London. Bryson, B. (1996). Anything But Heavy Metal: Symbolic Exclusion and Musical Dislikes. American Sociological Review. 61, 884-899.
  7. Cialdini, R. B. & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annual Review of Psychology. 55, 591-621.
  8. DiMaggio, P. & Mohr, J. (1985).
  9. Cultural Capital, Educational Attainment, and Marital Selection. American Journal of Sociology. 90, 1231-1261.
  10. DiMaggio, P. & Useem, M. (1987). Social Class and Arts Consumption. Theory and Society. 5, 141-161.
  11. DiMaggio, P. & Mukhtar, T. (2004). Arts Participation As Cultural Capital in the United States, 1982-2002: Signs of Decline? Poetics. 32, 169-194.
  12. Erickson, B. (1996).
  13. Culture, Class, and Connections. American Journal of Sociology. 102, 217-251.
  14. European Commision. (2007). Eurobarometer 67.1 Cultural Values, Poverty and Social Exclusion, Developmental Aid, and Residential Mobility. February-March 2007. TNS OPINION & SOCIAL. Brussels (Producer); GESIS, Cologne (Publisher): ZA4529. Gans, H. (1973). Popular Culture and High Culture. New York: Free Press.
  15. Halle, D. (1992). The Audience for Abstract Art: Class, Culture, and Power. In M. Lamont & M. Fournier (Eds.), Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality (pp. 131-151). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  16. Holt, D. B. (1998). Does Cultural Capital Structure American Consumption? Journal of Consumer Research. 25, 1- 25. Hornsey, M. J., Louise M., Terry, D. J. & McKimmie, B. M. (2003). On Being Loud and Proud: Non-Conformity and Counter-Conformity to Group Norms. British Journal of Social Psychology. 42, 319-335.
  17. Jacobs, M. D. & Hanrahan, N. W. (2005). The Blackwell Comp