Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 53

THE ISSUE OF SHARING THE NILE: A COMPETITION BETWEEN EGYPT, SUDAN AND ETHIOPIA WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF HYDRO-DIPLOMACY

NİL'İN PAYLAŞILMASI MESELESİ: HİDRO-DİPLOMASİ BAĞLAMINDA MISIR, SUDAN VE ETİYOPYA REKABETİ

Pages
107–120
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, the resolution of the issues pending from the past to present and the distribution of the Nile within the context of hydro-diplomacy has a great importance from international security standpoint.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The upper riparian countries of the Nile River basin influencing the lower riparian countries, controlling the water resources according their needs, and dominating it for the benefit of their foreign policy and geopolitical priorities is considered as an exception of the international water regimes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The colonial competitiveness and the basin's hydrodiplomatic activities that were the main influencing triggers emerging this situation, all shaped with the 1959 agreement built over the heritage of the British totalitarian policies on the Nile, were the reason behind water crisis between Egypt, Sudan, Ethiopia and other basin countries, a crisis unresolved to date.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, the resolution of the issues pending from the past to present and the distribution of the Nile within the context of hydro-diplomacy has a great importance from international security standpoint.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The upper riparian countries of the Nile River basin influencing the lower riparian countries, controlling the water resources according their needs, and dominating it for the benefit of their foreign policy and geopolitical priorities is considered as an exception of the international water regimes. The colonial competitiveness and the basin's hydrodiplomatic activities that were the main influencing triggers emerging this situation, all shaped with the 1959 agreement built over the heritage of the British totalitarian policies on the Nile, were the reason behind water crisis between Egypt, Sudan, Ethiopia and other basin countries, a crisis unresolved to date. Although being a foster for regional cooperation, the Grand Renaissance (an-Nahda) Dam and new actors in the basin give the impression that the status quo of the Nile disagreement issue will not be changed in the short term. As a result, the resolution of the issues pending from the past to present and the distribution of the Nile within the context of hydro-diplomacy has a great importance from international security standpoint.

Özet

Nil Nehri havzası, yukarı kıyıdaş ülkelerin aşağı kıyıdaş ülkeleri etkisi altına alıp su yönetimini kendi ihtiyaçlarına, dış politika ve jeopolitik önceliklerine göre baskı altına almaya çalışmaları uluslararası su rejimlerine bir istisnadır. Bu durumun ortaya çıkmasını tetikleyen etkenlerin başında gelen havzadaki sömürgeci rekabet ve hidro-diplomasi faaliyetleri, İngilizlerin bütüncül Nil politikalarının mirası üzerine inşa edilen 1959 Antlaşması ile son şeklini alarak günümüze kadar uzanan Mısır, Sudan, Etiyopya ve diğer havza ülkelerinin arasında hidro krizlerin çıkmasına sebebiyet vermiştir. Büyük Rönesans (en-Nahda) Barajı ve havzadaki yeni aktörler, bölgesel işbirliği umutlarını yeşertse de, Nil uyuşmazlığı meselesindeki statükonun kısa vadede değişmeyeceğinin işaretlerini vermektedir. Dolayısıyla geçmişten günümüze uzanan sorunların çözümü ve uluslararası güvenlik açısından hidro-diplomasi bağlamında Nil'in paylaşılması meselesi büyük önem arz etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TANDOĞAN, M., YÜCEL, O. K. (2022). THE ISSUE OF SHARING THE NILE: A COMPETITION BETWEEN EGYPT, SUDAN AND ETHIOPIA WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF HYDRO-DIPLOMACY. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 53, 107–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/492675

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. BOA, A.MTZ.(05), 2C/20-4, 27/L/1324 (14 Aralık 1906), Lef. 13. BOA, HR.SYS, 1004/20, 08/07/1899. BOA, HRT.h, 109, 30/Ra/1270 (31 Aralık 1853). BOA, Y.PRK.MK, 20/126, 25/M/1323 (1 Nisan 1905).
  2. BOA, Y.PRK.MK, 5/91, 25/R/1310 (16 Kasım 1892). BOA, Y.PRK.NMH, 7/110, 30/Z/1316 (11 Mayıs 1899). Abdo, M. (2004). The Nile Question: The Accords on the Water of the Nile and Their Implications on Cooperative Schemes in the Basin, Perceptions Summer, 45-57.
  3. Ashebir, E. (2009). The Politics of Nile Basin. University of Witwaterrsrand, Thesis of Master, International Relations, Johannesurg. Bilgenoğlu, A. (2010). Amerikan İç Savaşı ve Mısır: Pamuk Örneğinde Mısır Modernleşmesi ve Amerikan İç Savaşı'nın Sürece Olan Katkısı, Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3/11 Spring, 147-161.
  4. Ferede, W. & Abebe, S. (2014). The Efficacy of Water Treaties in the Eastern Nile Basin, Africa Spectrum, 49/1: 55-67.
  5. Gilbert, E. & Reynolds, J. T. (2016). Dünya Tarihinde Afrika-Tarih Öncesinden Günümüze, Çev.Mehmet Demirkaya, İstanbul:
  6. Küre Yayınları.
  7. Green, Dominic (2007). Three Empires on the Nile: The Victorian Jihad 1869-1899, New York:Free Press Hatami, H. & Gleick, P. (1994). Chronology of Conflict over Water in the Legends, Myths, andHistory of the Ancient Middle East, Water, war, and peace in the Middle East,Environment. 36, No. 3, S. 6, Washington: Heldref Publishers.
  8. Hobsbawm, E. J. (2013).
  9. Sanayi ve İmparatorluk, Ankara:
  10. Dost Yayınları.
  11. Jacobs, M. Inga (2012). The Politics of Water of Africa: Norms, Environmental Regions and Transbondary Cooperation in the Orange-Senqu and Nile River, New York: Continuum. Justinian, Caesar Flavius (2014).
  12. The Institutes of Justinian, Çev. J.B. Moyle, 5. Baskı (1913),
  13. Catania Press.
  14. Katz, C. L. (2013). Another Cup at the Nile's Crowded Spigot: South Sudan and its Nile Water Rights, Georgetown Journal of International Law, 44: 1249-1279.
  15. Kitissou, M. (2007). Water in the context of Africa: Geopolitics and geo-economics, TheHydropolitics of Africa: A Contemporary Challenge, Marcel Kitissou, Muna Ndulo,Mechthild Nagel and Margaret Grieco (Eds.), Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishers.
  16. Lencho, T. R. (2014). Challenges of Cooperation in The Nile And Euphrates-Tigris Basins: AComparative Analysis, Thesis of Master, Addis Ababa University School of Graduate Studies, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Addis Ababa. Mekonnen, T. (2004). The Blue Nile Issue: A History of Hydropolitcs, 1884-1974,
  17. Thesis of Master, Addis Ababa