SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Kadın, Doğum ve Çocuk Hastanelerinde Girdi Tıkanıklığı ve Aylak Girdilere Bağlı Kayıpların Analizi

M. Ensar YEŞİLYURT
Filiz YEŞİLYURT
Pages
41–54
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained the highest efficiency belongs to Department of Social Security Hospitals which are fully efficient.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study technical efficiency structure of the women, maternity and child hospitals in Turkey are analyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The efficiency level of private hospital is 0.841 and the efficiency level of hospitals that belongs to Ministry of Health is 0.808.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained the highest efficiency belongs to Department of Social Security Hospitals which are fully efficient.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study technical efficiency structure of the women, maternity and child hospitals in Turkey are analyzed. According to the results obtained the highest efficiency belongs to Department of Social Security Hospitals which are fully efficient. The efficiency level of private hospital is 0.841 and the efficiency level of hospitals that belongs to Ministry of Health is 0.808. Besides, the most important difference of this study from its similars is calculation of welfare losses according to input congestion and idle input which have not been considered enough until now and can be used as an important political device. Welfare loss which occurs according to the congestions and slacks is 4,647,044 YTL.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren kadın, doğum ve çocuk hastanelerinin teknik etkinlik yapısı analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre en yüksek etkinliğe Sosyal Sigortalar Kurumuna bağlı hastaneler sahip olup tam etkindir. Özel hastanelerin etkinlik düzeyi 0,841; Sağlık Bakanlığına bağlı hastanelerin etkinlik düzeyi ise 0,808’dir. Bu çalışmanın benzerlerinden önemli bir farklılığı, bir politika aracı olarak kullanılabilecek ve şimdiye kadar üzerinde yeterince durulmamış olan girdi tıkanıklığı ve aylak girdilere bağlı refah kayıplarının hesaplanmış olmasıdır. Girdi tıkanıklığı ve aylak girdilere bağlı olarak oluşan refah kaybı 4.647.044 YTL’dir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YEŞİLYURT, M. E., YEŞİLYURT, F. (2022). Kadın, Doğum ve Çocuk Hastanelerinde Girdi Tıkanıklığı ve Aylak Girdilere Bağlı Kayıpların Analizi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 41–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/490746

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Banker R.D., Charnes A., Cooper W.W. (1984). Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficincies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 251-253.
  2. Baysal M.E, Çerçioğlu H., Toklu B. (2004). Sağlık Sektöründe Bir Performans Değerlendirme Çalışması. Yöneylem Araştırması/Endüstri Mühendisliği, XXIV Ulusal Kongresi, Gaziantep-Adana 1-3, 15-18 Haziran 2004.
  3. Björkgren M.A., Hakinken U., Linna M. (2001). Measuring Efficiency of Long-Term Care Units in Finland. Health Care Management Sciences, 4(3), 193-200.
  4. Boles J. N. (1967). Efficiency Squared-Efficient Computation of Efficiency Indexes. Western Farm Economic Association Proceedings, 137-142.
  5. Boles J. N (1971). The Farrell Efficiecy System-Multiple Products, Multiple Factors. California: Giovanni Foundation of Agricultural Economics. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes, E. (1981). Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficieney: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through. Management Science, 27(6), 668-697.
  6. Coelli, T. (1996). A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1. CEPA Working Paper, Armidale, Australia. Coelli T., Rao, P., Battase G. (1998). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishes. Deliktaş E., Balcilar, M. (2005). A Comparative Analysis of Productivity Growth, Catch-up and Convergence in Transition Economies. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 41(1), 6-28.
  7. Farrell M. J. (1957). The Measurement of Production Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, General, 120(3), 253-290.
  8. Grosskopf S., Margaritis D., Valdmanis V. (2001). Comparing Teaching and Non-teaching Hospitals: A Frontier Approach (Teaching vs. Non-Teaching Hospitals). Health Care Management Sciences, 4(2), 89-107.
  9. Grosskopf S., Hayes K., Taylor L. and Weber W. (1999). Anticipating the Consequences of School Reform: A New Use of DEA, Management Science, 45(4), 608-620.
  10. Helvig, B. ve Lapsley, I. (2001). On the Efficiency of Public Welfare and Private Hospital in Germany Over Time: A Sectoral Data Envelopment Analysis Study. Health Service Management Research, 14(4), 263-274.
  11. Kök R. ve Deliktaş E. (2003). Endüstri İktisadında Verimlilik Ölçme ve Strateji Geliştirme Teknikleri. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Yayınları.
  12. Prior, D., ve Sola M. (2000). Technical Efficiency and Economies of Diversification in Health Care. Health Care Management Science, 3, 299-307.
  13. Reichmann, M.S. (2000). The Impact of the Austrian