SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

GENİŞLEYEN BİR AVRUPA DA ÜLKE SPESİFİK YAKINSAMA DAVRANIŞI

COUNTRY-SPECIFIC CONVERGENCE BEHAVIOR IN AN ENLARGED EUROPE

Gülçin GÜREŞÇİ PEHLİVAN
Utku UTKULU
Pages
207–226
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This contribution gives crucial information about the European Union countries and candidate countries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ABSTRACT European Union is the main interest of this paper on account of the long- established integration from 1950 s.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As we found cross-section dependence, we present second generation panel cointegration tests of the theory for the European Union countries and candidate countries for the period 1990-2011.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This contribution gives crucial information about the European Union countries and candidate countries.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

ABSTRACT European Union is the main interest of this paper on account of the long- established integration from 1950 s. This paper examines the process of convergence in relative GDP per capita across European Union countries and candidate countries. As we found cross-section dependence, we present second generation panel cointegration tests of the theory for the European Union countries and candidate countries for the period 1990-2011. This paper also shows country-specific conditional and unconditional convergence at the long-run model by way of using Common Correlated Effect Model. This contribution gives crucial information about the European Union countries and candidate countries.

Özet

Avrupa Birliği 1950den beri köklü bir entegrasyon olması nedeniyle bu çalışmanın asıl inceleme konusudur. Bu çalışma nispi kişi başına GSYH yakınsama sürecini Avrupa Birliği ülkeleri ve aday ülkeler açısından incelemektedir. Teoriyi yatay kesit bağımlılığı bulduğumuz için Avrupa Birliği ülkeleri ve aday ülkeler için ikinci kuşak panel koentegrasyon testleri ile 1990-2011 dönemi için ortaya koyduk. Bu çalışma ayrıca ülke spesifik koşullu ve koşulsuz yakınsama sonuçlarını uzun dönem modelinde Ortak İlişkili Etkiler Modeli kullanılarak vermektedir. Bu katı AB ülkeleri ve aday ülkeler için çok önemli bilgiler sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

PEHLİVAN, G. G., UTKULU, U. (2022). GENİŞLEYEN BİR AVRUPA DA ÜLKE SPESİFİK YAKINSAMA DAVRANIŞI. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 207–226. https://ajindex.com/articles/490692

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Altin, O., Demirci S., Cakir, O. & Semiz, H. (2010). AB Genisleme Surecinin Uye Ulkelerin Iktisadi Buyumesi ve Dis Ticareti Uzerine Etkileri: Panel Veri Analizi [EU Enlargement Process Economic Growth and Foreign Trade EEffects on Candidate Countries: Panel Data Analysis]. Accessed: 11 February 2012, http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/yeni/iletisimgm/O_Cakir-O_Altin- S_DemirciH_ Semiz.pdf>. Amable B. & Juillard M. (2000). The Historical Process of Convergence, http://www.jourdan.ens.fr/~amable/tableconv.pdf
  2. Baldwin, R.E. (1989). The Growth Effect of 1992, Economic Policy: A European Forum, 9, 247-281.
  3. Baldwin, R.E. & Seghezza, E. (1996). Testing for Trade-induced Investment-led Growth, NBER Working Paper Series, 5416. Barro, R.J. & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995).
  4. Economic Growth, United States of America: McGraw- Hill, Inc. Barro R.J. & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1997).
  5. Technological Diffusion, Convergence and Growth, Journal of Economic Growth, 2(1), 1-27.
  6. Barro, R.J. (1997). Determinants of Economic Growth: a Cross-country Empirical Study. Cambridge, England: The MIT Press.
  7. Bernard, A. B. & Durlauf, S. N. (1991). Convergence of International Output Movements, National Brueau of Economic Research, 3717, 1-45.
  8. Bernard, A. B. & Jones, C. I. (1996).
  9. Technology and Convergence, The Economic Journal, 106(437), 1037-1044.
  10. Bhagwati, J. & Srinivasan, T. N. (2002). Trade and Poverty in the Poor Countries, The American Economic Review, 92(2), 180-183.
  11. Borota, T. & Kutan, A. M. (2008). Regional Integration and Economic Growth: The Case of the European Union, The Journal of International Trade and Diplomacy, 2 (1), 93-113.
  12. Dogan, N. & Saracoglu, B. (2007). Income Convergence of European Union and Candidate Countries: Are they all the Same?, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 12, 160- 164. Dollar, D. (1992). Outward-oriented Developing Countries Really do Growth more Rapidly: Evidence from 95 LDCs 1976-1985, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 39(1), 523-544.
  13. Edwards, S. (1992).
  14. Trade Orientation, Distortions, and Growth in Developing Countries, Journal of Development Economics, 39 (1), 31-57.
  15. Firgo, M. & Huber, P. (2013). Unconditional Convergence in Currency Unions: An Analysis of European Regions from 1991 to 2009, Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities Europe Moving Towards a New Path of Economic Growth and Social Development- Collaborative Project, 4, 1-45.
  16. Frankel, J.A. & Romer, D. (1996). Does Trade Cause Growth?, American Economic Review, 89(3), 379-399. Gha