SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

MEASURING TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY OF TURKISH MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY BASED ON ACCOUNTING DATA

TÜRK İMALAT SANAYİ TOPLAM VERİMLİLİĞİNİN MUHASEBE VERİLERİNE DAYALI OLARAK ÖLÇÜLMESİ

Dursun BALKAN
Önder BELGİN
Pages
431–447
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results obtained from the analysis allows us tounderstand the total productivity and the source of the productivity changesrelated to partial productivities of the Turkish manufacturing industry.Furthermore, the potential productivity improvement areas are interpreted owingto these results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Productivity is still an important performance measure for the firm level andmacroeconomic level.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study addresses total productivity measurement basedon RAPMODS using basic accounting data for Turkish manufacturing industry forthe period of 2006 to 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results obtained from the analysis allows us tounderstand the total productivity and the source of the productivity changesrelated to partial productivities of the Turkish manufacturing industry.Furthermore, the potential productivity improvement areas are interpreted owingto these results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Productivity is still an important performance measure for the firm level andmacroeconomic level. This study addresses total productivity measurement basedon RAPMODS using basic accounting data for Turkish manufacturing industry forthe period of 2006 to 2016. The results obtained from the analysis allows us tounderstand the total productivity and the source of the productivity changesrelated to partial productivities of the Turkish manufacturing industry.Furthermore, the potential productivity improvement areas are interpreted owingto these results.

Özet

Verimlilik, hem işletme düzeyinde hem de makroekonomik seviye için halen önemli bir performans ölçütüdür. Bu çalışma, temel muhasebe verilerini kullanan RAPMODS yöntemiyle 2006-2016 dönemleri arasında Türk imalat sanayisinin toplam verimlilik ölçümünün yapılmasına dayanmaktadır. Analiz sonucunda, toplam verimlilik ve kısmi verimlilik ölçütleri ile birlikte Türk imalat sanayinde verimlilik değişimlerinin kaynakları mali veriler üzerinden değerlendirilmiştir. Ayrıca, bu sonuçlara bağlı olarak potansiyel verimlilik iyileştirme alanları da ortaya konulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALKAN, D., BELGİN, Ö. (2022). MEASURING TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY OF TURKISH MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY BASED ON ACCOUNTING DATA. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 431–447. https://ajindex.com/articles/490678

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Andai, S.O. (2015). Relationship Between Labour Practices and Firm Productivity in the Export Processing Zones in Kenya. Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, PhD. Thesis, Jkuat, Kenya Balinea, S. (2018). Measuring the Productivity of Commercial Banks Using RAPMODS. Mongolian Finance and Economy University MSc. Thesis, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Demirtaş, U., Tokat, E. (2012). Measurement and Diagnosis in Productivity Management in Manufacturing SMEs: A Case Study. Journal of Productivity, 3, 7-38.
  2. Ghalayini, A.M., Noble, J. S. (1996). The Changing Basis of Performance Measurement. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(8), 63-80.
  3. Hannula, M. (2002). Total Productivity Measurement based on Partial Productivity Ratios. International Jornal of Production Economics, 78, 57-67.
  4. Lilly, M., Obiajulu, U., Ogaji, S., & Probert, S. (2007). Total Productivity Analysis of a Nigerianpetroleum-Product Marketing Company. Applied Energy, 84, 1150-1173.
  5. Porter, M. (1994). The Competitive Advance of Nations. London: The Macmillan Press.
  6. Miller, D. M., & Rao, P. M. (1989). Analysis of Profit-Linked Total-Factor Productivity Measurement Models at the Firm Level. Management Science, 35(6), 757-767.
  7. Özsever, Ç., Gençoğlu, T. And Erginel, N. (2009). The System Design for Monitoring Labour Productivity and Development Decision Support System. Journal of Science and Technology of Dumlupınar University, 18, 45-58.
  8. Phusavat, K., and Photaranon, W. (2006). Productivity/Performance Measurement: Case Application at The Government Pharmaceutical Organization. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(9), 1272-1287.
  9. Prokopenko, J. (1987). Productivity Management: A Practical Handbook. Geneva: International Labor Office. Ramsay, M. R. (1973). Overall Productivity Measurement. First World Productivity Congress. Bombay: Indian Institute of Industrial Engineering. Rao, M. P. (2006). A Performance Measurement System Using A ProfitLinked Multi-Factor Measurement Model. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(3), 362-379.
  10. Rao, M. P. (2007). From A Black Hole to A Hole-In-One. Management Accounting Quarterly, 8(2), 32-46.
  11. Rao, M. P., and Miller, D. M. (2003). Expert Systems Applications for Productivity Analysis. Industrial Management & DataSystems, 104(9), 776-785.
  12. Rao, M. P., Miller, D. M., and Lin, B. (2005). PET: An Expert System for Productivity Analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 29, 300- 309. Rao, M., & Mandal, P. (2012). Evaluating The Im