Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

RETHINKING DEVELOPMENT: CURRENT ISSUES AND DEBATES

KALKINMAYI YENİDEN DÜŞÜNMEK: GÜNCEL TARTIŞMALAR VE SORULAR

Pages
301–325
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study aims to contribute to this literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The article aims to analyze how debates around the rise of the East, global crisis and trade wars have engendered new questions in the development studies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There has been few studies in Turkish development literature regarding how the development studies has been evolving since the development paradigm has collapsed in the 1990s.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study aims to contribute to this literature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The article aims to analyze how debates around the rise of the East, global crisis and trade wars have engendered new questions in the development studies. It does so through a historical analysis of how development studies have evolved in time. It argues that it is probable to observe two tendencies in the literature. First, global development studies are prioritized. Second, alternatives to the Western structure are studied. There has been few studies in Turkish development literature regarding how the development studies has been evolving since the development paradigm has collapsed in the 1990s. This study aims to contribute to this literature.

Özet

Çalışma Doğu’nun yükselişi, küresel kriz ve ticaret savaşları gibi bugünkütarihsel gelişmelerin kalkınma çalışmalarını nasıl etkilediğini ve ne gibi sorularıgündeme getirdiğini incelemeyi amaçlar. İkinci Dünya Savaşı sonrası gelişenkalkınma çalışmalarının ne gibi tarihsel süreçlerden geçtiğini araştırır. Kalkınmasonrası dönem olarak adlandırılan bugünkü kalkınma gündeminde özellikle ikieğilimin olduğunu tartışır. Birincisi, küresel kalkınma çalışmalarının vesürdürülebilir kalkınma hedeflerinin kalkınma yazınında ön plana çıkmasıdır.İkincisi ise Doğu’nun yükselişi tartışmaları içinde Batı merkezli sisteme alternatifgeliştirme tartışmalarıdır. Özellikle 1990’larda kalkınma paradigmasınınsonlanmasından sonra Türkçe kalkınma literatürde kalkınma tartışmalarınınnasıl ilerlediğine dair çok çalışma bulunmamaktadır. Bu çalışma bu Türkçeyazına katkı sağlamayı amaçlar.

🔖

Cite This Article

UZGÖREN, E. (2022). RETHINKING DEVELOPMENT: CURRENT ISSUES AND DEBATES. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 301–325. https://ajindex.com/articles/490673

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Birleşmiş Milletler (2019). Post-2015 Development Agenda. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/about-unodc/post-2015- development-agenda.html (18.09.2019).
  2. Browne, S. (2014). A Changing World: is the UN development system ready?. Third World Quarterly, 35(10): 1845-1859.
  3. Calvert, P. (2005). Changing Notions of Development: Bringing the State Back in. J. Haynes (Ed.), Palgrave Advances in Development Studies (pp. 47-64). Houndmills: Palgrave. Escobar, A. (1995).
  4. Encountering Development, The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  5. Esteva, G. ve Escobar, A. (2017). Post-Development @ 25: on “being stuck” and moving forward, sideways, backward and otherwise. Third World Quarterly, 38(12): 2559-2572.
  6. Erbay, E. R. ve Özden, M. (2013). İktisadi Kalkınma Kuramlarına Eleştirel Yaklaşım. Sosyal Bilimler Metinleri, 1: 1-27.
  7. Ercan, F. (2001).
  8. Modernizm, Kapitalizm ve Azgelişmişlik. İstanbul:
  9. Bağlam. Fatton, Jr. R. (2016). Development and the Outer Periphery: The Logic of Exclusion. A. Cafruny, L. S. Talani ve G. P. Martin (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Critical International Political Economy (pp. 119-137), London: Palgrave. Fine, B. (2001). Neither the Washington nor the post-Washington Consensus: An Introduction. B. Fine, C. Lapavitsas ve J. Pincus (Eds.), Development Policy in the Twenty-first Century, Beyond the post-Washington Consensus (pp. 1-28). London: Routledge. Frank, A. G. (1966). The development of underdevelopment. Monthly Review, 4-17.
  10. Gills, B. (2017). The Future of Development from Global Crises to Global Convergence. Forum for Development Studies, 44(1): 155-161.
  11. Gray, K. ve Gills, B. K. (2016). South-South cooperation and the rise of the Global South. Third World Quarterly, 37(4): 557-574.
  12. Gosovic, B. (2016). The resurgence of South-South cooperation. Third World Quarterly, 37(4): 733-43.
  13. Haynes, J. (2005). Introduction. J. Haynes (Ed.), Palgrave Advances in Development Studies (pp. 3-26). Houndmills: Palgrave. Hettne, B. (2005). Discourse on Development. J. Haynes (Ed.), Palgrave Advances in Development Studies (pp. 26-46). Houndmills: Palgrave. Hettne, B. (2009).
  14. Thinking about Development, Development Matters. London: Zed Books. Hsu, J. Y. J. (2015). China’s development: a new development paradigm?. Third World Quarterly, 36(9), 1754-1769.
  15. Hyden, G. (2014). The Ever-Changing Nature of Development Research: The Newest Challenge. Forum for Development Studies, 41(3), 501- 511. IMF (2019). World GDP Share. https:/