Journals / Divan Edebiyatı Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 22

A Forgotten Apology of Ottoman Poetry from the pen of J. W. Redhouse: “Turkish Poetry”

J. W. Redhouse’un Kaleminden Osmanlı Şiirinin Unutulmuş Bir Müdafaanamesi: “Turkish Poetry

Pages
331–358
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

I will also examine the main motivations of the Western literary corpus on Ottoman literature and the contribution of Redhouse’s article to this corpus.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article analyses J.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Redhouse’s article “On the History, System and Varieties of Turkish Poetry” (1879), the first comprehensive work on Ottoman poetry in the West after the works of Josef von Hammer-Purgstall’s Geschichte der Osmanischen Dichtkunst (1836–8), M.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:I will also examine the main motivations of the Western literary corpus on Ottoman literature and the contribution of Redhouse’s article to this corpus.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article analyses J. W. Redhouse’s article “On the History, System and Varieties of Turkish Poetry” (1879), the first comprehensive work on Ottoman poetry in the West after the works of Josef von Hammer-Purgstall’s Geschichte der Osmanischen Dichtkunst (1836–8), M. Servan de Sugny’s La Muse Ottomane (1853) and Dora d'Istria’s La poésie des Ottomans (1877). Redhouse’s ar- ticle responded to the negative representation of Turks who were portrayed as “barbarians” by certain writers of his time. Redhouse aims to change these negative perceptions of Turks and thereby puts forward the first critical study on the historiography of Ottoman poetry. In this piece, I examine the context and discourse of Redhouse’s “Turkish Poetry”. I will also examine the main motivations of the Western literary corpus on Ottoman literature and the contribution of Redhouse’s article to this corpus.

Özet

Bu çalışma, J. W. Redhouse’un “On the History, System andVarieties of Turkish Poetry” (1879) başlıklı makalesini tartış-maya açmaktadır. Bu makale, Josef von Hammer-Purgstall’ınGeschichte der Osmanischen Dichtkunst (1836–8), M. Servande Sugny’nin La Muse Ottomane (1853) ve Dora d'Istria’nınLa poésie des Ottomans (1877) adlı çalışmalarından sonraBatı’da Osmanlı şiirini müstakil olarak ele alan ilk makaledir.Redhouse’un bu makalesi, o dönemde Batı’daki “barbar Türk”imajına bir tepki olarak kaleme alınmıştır. Redhouse, “TurkishPoetry” ile Türklere karşı oluşturulan bu olumsuz algıyı yık-maya çalışırken bir yandan da Osmanlı şiirinin tarihselliğinikonu edinen ilk eleştirel çalışmayı ortaya koymuştur. Redho-use’un “Turkish Poetry” başlıklı makalesinin içeriğinin,söyleminin ve Osmanlı edebiyat tarihi yazınındaki yerinin ana-liz edileceği bu makalede, Batı’daki Osmanlı edebiyatıliteratürünün nasıl bir motivasyonla üretildiği ve Redhouse’unmakalesinin bu literatüre nasıl bir katkı sağladığı ortaya konul-muştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜR, N. (2022). A Forgotten Apology of Ottoman Poetry from the pen of J. W. Redhouse: “Turkish Poetry”. Divan Edebiyatı Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 22, 331–358. https://ajindex.com/articles/489730

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. ALEXANDER, H. Elizabeth (1934), “E. J. W. Gibb.” Transactions of the Glasgow University Oriental Society, 6, 24–29. ALİ AZİZ EFENDİ (1884). The Story of Jewad. E J. W. Gibb (Çev.). Glasgow: Wilson& McCormick. AYÇİÇEĞİ, Bünyamin (2019). “İbn Kemâl’in Yavuz Mersiyesi ve Tahir Ol- gun’un Şerhi.” Türk Kültürü İncelemeleri Dergisi, 40, 417-450.
  2. BİSAHA, Nancy (2004), “The New Barbarian: Redefining the Turks in Classi- cal Terms”. Creating East and West: Renaissance Humanists and the Ottoman Turks, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 70 - 78. BOWEN, Harold (1945), British Contributions to Turkish Studies. Londra: Bri- tish Council’s Code Name: Turkish Studies. BROWNE, Edward G. (1912), “Gibb, Elias John Wilkinson”. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press.
  3. CHODZKO, Alexander (1842), Specimens of the Popular Poetry of Persia, as Fo- und in the Adventures and Improvisations of Kurroglou, the Bandit - Minstrel of Northern Persia, and in the Songs of the People Inhabiting the Shores of the Caspian Sea. London: Printed for the Oriental Transla- tion Fund of Great Britain and Ireland. CHEW, Samuel C. (1937),
  4. The Crescent and the Rose, Islam and England during the Renaissance. New York: Oxford University Press.
  5. ÇIRAKMAN, Aslı (2001), "Tyranny to Despotism: The Enlightenment's Unen- lightened Image of the Turks". International Journal of Middle East Studies, C. 33, No: 1, 49-68.
  6. ÇİÇEKTAKAN, Nazım Can (2014), “Great Britain and the Ottoman Empire: British Discourses on the 'Ottomans’, 1860-187”.
  7. Doktora Tezi, Es- sex Üniversitesi.
  8. CLARK, N. G. (1878), The Gospel in the Ottoman Empire. Cambridge: Riverside Press.
  9. CLOUSTON, W. A. (ed.) (1881), Arabian Poetry for English Readers. Glasgow, Privately Printed. DAVİSON, Roderic H. (1981), “The Image of Turkey in the West, in Historical Perspective”. Turkish Studies Association Bulletin, Cilt: 5, Nu: 1, 1-6.
  10. DAVİSON, Roderic H. (1993), “Türklerin Batı’daki Tarihsel İmajı”. Tarih ve Toplum Cilt: 19, Sayı: 109, 34-38. D’HERBELOT, Barthé lemy vd (1777), Bibliothè que orientale, ou Dictionnaire universel contenant tout ce qui fait connoî tre les peuples de l'Orient. La- hey: J. Neaulme & N. van Daalen. EL-KHAZREJİYY, ‘Aliyyu’bnu’l-Hasan (1906), The Pearl-Strings; A History of the Resûliyy Dynasty of Yemen. (J. W. Redhouse, Çev), (E. G. Browne, R. A. Nicholson ve A. Rogers, Ed.), London: Luzac. EL-SHANFARA (1881), The L-Poem of The Arabs. J. W. Redhouse (Çev.). Londra: Trübner & Co. ERKOÇ, Seda (201