AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightIn addition, some Western writer ssuch as "Dozy and precedent" objected to the propensity of the inspiration in their works, We will also focus on the oppo sing views of Dozy about the Prophet he put forward in theface of allegations of epilepsy and hysteria.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
The West, which defines them selves as “we” and the rest as "the other" out side themselves, the other religion and ethnic groups, especially the Muslims, and has always been against Islam, which offers as an alternative life and culture to the values that shape it sown life. After the Jesus, the Muhammad was sent as a prophet however the West considers that was disturbed the members of other religions. For this reason, Christians and members of other religions, especially Christians, have been constantly criticizing Islam throughout its history, starting shortly after the emergence of prophet Muhammed and holybook Quran. Among those one particular was the Dutch Dozy who made some researches on eastern languages, like many previous western writers, then Dozy has written a book about the Prophet, that does not reflect historical facts, and has been translated into Turkish entitled the name "History of Islam" by Abdullah Cevdet, who enjoys the liberation of the Constitutional period. The book has caused big dilemma and made a great confusion in the Ottoman public opinion, further it has been rejected in many ways. Among the many rejections, One very particular of these rejections was the work which was entitled "History of Islam" by Ahmed Hilmi from Plovdiv also known as Filibeli Ahmed Hilmi. In the work of Ahmed Hilmi, the authors ought to give the answer to the claim of Dozy’s works by stating that Dozy was prejudice, the facts are not correct and unfounded, further non-conforming views on Islam as well as the Qur'an. In this study, we examine the view of Ahmed Hilmi about the distortions of the Torahand the Bibleand the evaluations of the Qur'an. In addition, some Western writer ssuch as "Dozy and precedent" objected to the propensity of the inspiration in their works, We will also focus on the oppo sing views of Dozy about the Prophet he put forward in theface of allegations of epilepsy and hysteria.
Özet
Kendilerini “biz” diğer din ve etnik grupları özellikle de Müslümanları“öteki” olarak niteleyen Batının, kendi yaşamını şekillendiren değerlere alter-natif bir yaşam ve kültür sunan İslam’ın sürekli karşısında olduğu tarihî birvakıadır. Bundan Batı Hıristiyanları, İslamiyet’i, onun peygamberini ve kutsalkitabını, tarih boyunca sürekli eleştirmişlerdir.Bunlardan birisi de Hollandalı müsteşrik Dozy’dir. Doğu dilleri hakkındaaraştırma yapan Dozy, tarihî gerçeklere ters düşen bir eser yazmış, AbdullahCevdet tarafından da “Tarih-i İslamiyet” adıyla Türkçeye çevrilmiştir. Os-manlı kamuoyunda büyük tepkilere sebep olan bu esere çok sayıda reddiyeyazılmıştır. Bu reddiyelerden birisi de Filibeli Ahmed Hilmi’nin “Tarih-i İs-lam” adlı eseridir. Filibeli Ahmed eserinde Dozy’nin Hz. Peygamber, İslamve Kur’an hakkındaki önyargılı, mesnetsiz ve tarih metodolojisine uymayangörüşlerine cevaplar vermiştir. Bu çalışmada Filibeli’nin Kur’an’la ilgili yap-tığı değerlendirmeler ile “Dozy ve emsali” dediği bazı Batılı müelliflerin eser-lerinde vahyin keyfiyetine yönelik olarak yaptığı itirazlar ile Hz. Peygamber’esara ve histeri hastalığı ithamları karşısında ortaya koyduğu karşı görüşleriüzerinde durulacaktır.