SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

The Future of Psychology of Religion

DİN PSİKOLOJİSİNİN GELECEĞİ

Necmi KARSLI
Jacob A BELZEN
Pages
235–246
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After a brief tour d'horizon we will arrive at a position that will show up to be a transformed version of the first position.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Speaking about the future inevitably reveals fantasies, hopes, and desires.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although this will evidently not yield the deutsche Gründlichkeit for which a European may long, my presentation will nevertheless not be without Hegelian (and even some personal) passion.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After a brief tour d'horizon we will arrive at a position that will show up to be a transformed version of the first position.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Speaking about the future inevitably reveals fantasies, hopes, and desires. It may be honest, therefore, not to try to suppress (too much) the personal character of any thoughts on the future of psychology of religion. It may also be fair to add that these thoughts are being formulated by someone devoted to this field of scholarship for reasons of intrinsic interest, but also because he makes a living from it. In order to make the different possible arguments, thoughts and associations on the future of psychology of religion understandable, I propose to make a kind of dialectic tour through five different positions, each of which I will present with only a few words and sentences. Although this will evidently not yield the deutsche Gründlichkeit for which a European may long, my presentation will nevertheless not be without Hegelian (and even some personal) passion. After a brief tour d'horizon we will arrive at a position that will show up to be a transformed version of the first position.

Özet

Gelecek hakkında konuşmak, kaçınılmaz bir şekilde fantezileri, ümitleri ve arzuları ortaya çıkarır. Bu nedenle, din psikolojisinin geleceği hakkında herhangi bir düşüncenin özel yapısını (çok fazla) hasıraltı etmeye çalışmamak dürüstçe olabilir. Aynı zamanda gerçekten ilgi duymaları ve ayrıca ondan hayatını kazanmaları nedeniyle kendilerini bu alana adamış kişiler tarafından formülleştirilmekte olan bu düşünceleri toplamak doğru bir davranış olabilir. Din psikolojisinin geleceği hakkındaki çeşitli muhtemel tartışma, düşünce ve birliktelikleri anlaşılabilir yapmak için, her birinde yalnızca birkaç kelime ve cümle sunacağım beş farklı görüş aracılığıyla bir tür diyalektik tur yapma niyetindeyim. Bu bir Avrupalının arzuladığı Alman titizliğiyle apaçık bir sonuç vermemesine rağmen, sunumum yine de Hegelci (ve hatta bazı kişisel) tutkular içerecektir. Kısa bir ufuk turunun sonunda ilk konumun değişmiş bir türünün gösterileceği bir konuma ulaşacağız.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARSLI, N., BELZEN, J. A. (2022). The Future of Psychology of Religion. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 235–246. https://ajindex.com/articles/489208

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Allport, G. W. (1950). The Individual and His Religion: A Psychological Interpretation. New York: Macmillan. Argyle, M., & Beit-Hallahmi, B. (1975). The Social Psychology of Religion. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Armon-Jones, C. (1986). The Thesis of Constructionism. In R. Harre (Ed.), The Social Construction of Emotions (Pp. 32-56). Oxford: Blackwell. Beit-Hallahmi, B. (1974). Psychology of Religion 1880-1930: The Rise and Fall of A Psychological Movement. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 10, 84-90.
  2. Beit-Hallahmi, B., & M. Argyle (1997). The Psychology of Religious Behaviour, Belief and Experience. London/New York: RoutledgeBelzen, J. A. (1994). Between Feast and Famine. A Sketch of the Development of the Psychology of Religion in the Netherlands. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 4, 181-198.
  3. Belzen, J. A. (1998).
  4. Errungenschaften, Desiderata, Perspektiven--Zur Lage Der Religionspsychologischen Forschung In Europa, 1970-1995. In C. Henning & E. Nestler (Eds.), Religion Und Religiosit¨At Zwischen Theologie Und Psychologie. (Pp. 131-158). Frankfurt: Lang. Belzen, J. A. (1999). Paradoxes. An Essay on the Object of Psychology of Religion. In J. G. Platvoet & A. L. Molendijk (Eds.), The Pragmatics of Defining Religion: Contexts, Concepts, and Contests (Pp. 93-122). Leiden: Brill. Bhugra, D. (1996). Psychiatry and Religion: Context, Consensus and Controversies. London/New York:Routledge. Freud, S. (1913/1964). Totem and Taboo. In J. Strachey (Ed. And Trans.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works Of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 13, Pp. 1- 161) London: Hogarth. Freud, S. (1927/1961). The Future of an Illusion. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. (Vol. 21, Pp. 1-56). London: Hogarth. Geelkerken, J. G. (1909). De Empirische Godsdienstpsychologie. Amsterdam: Scheltema & Holkema Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books. Hood, R.W., Spilka, B., Hunsberger, B.,&Gorsuch, R. (1996). The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Approach. New York: Guilford. James, W. (1902/1982). The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study In Human Nature. Hammondsworth: Penguin. Jones, J.W. (1991). Contemporary Psychoanalysis and Religion: Transference and Transcendence. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  5. Jones, J. W. (1996). Religion and Psychology in Transition: Psychoanalysis, Feminism And Theology. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
  6. Jung, C. (1938/1958). P