Journals / Damar Cerrahi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of Expanded Polytetrafluorothylene and Greater SAphenous vein Grafts in Above-Knee Arterial Bypass grafting operatins

Dizüstü Arteryel Baypas Greftleme Operasyonlarında Expanded Politetrafloroetilen ve Büyük Safen Ven Greftlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
29–34
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Key Words: Peripheral arterial disease; polytetrafluoroethylene; vascular grafting

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ABSTRACT Objec t ive : We aimed to compare patency rates of greater saphenous vein and ringed expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts in patients undergoing femoropopliteal bypass grafting.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mate ri al and Metho ds: The clinical records of 29 patients with Fontaine IIb-IV peripheral artery disease symptoms who underwent femoro-popliteal bypass grafting between January 2012 and December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Key Words: Peripheral arterial disease; polytetrafluoroethylene; vascular grafting
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objec t ive : We aimed to compare patency rates of greater saphenous vein and ringed expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts in patients undergoing femoropopliteal bypass grafting. Mate ri al and Metho ds: The clinical records of 29 patients with Fontaine IIb-IV peripheral artery disease symptoms who underwent femoro-popliteal bypass grafting between January 2012 and December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of graft used: A ringed PTFE graft was used in patients in Group 1 (n=17, mean age: 62.46±12.24 years, female/male ratio: 6/11), and a reversed greater saphenous vein graft was used in patients in Group 2 (n=12, mean age: 63.16±11.07 years, female/male ratio: 5/7), Follow-up in- formation was gathered during a period of 12 months after the operation, and included clinical in- formation and graft patency. Vascular surgeons who performed the operations determined operation techniques and the type of vascular grafts. Resu lts: Early graft failure within 30 days was not seen in either groups, One patient in Group 1 underwent a re-intervention for graft failure. This patient had a patent graft at the end of the follow-up period, One-year primary patency rate was 94 and 100 in Groups 1 and 2 respectively whereas secondary patency rate was 100 in both groups. Conclusion: Both type of grafts provided satisfactory one-year patency rates in treatment of femoro-popliteal ar- tery disease. Greater saphenous vein seems to require less re-intervention than PTFE graft in treat- ment of femoro-popliteal artery stenosis. Key Words: Peripheral arterial disease; polytetrafluoroethylene; vascular grafting

Özet

ÖZET Giriş: Çalışmamızın amacı, kliniğimizde uygulanan femoropopliteal baypas operasyonlarında kullandığımız ringli politetrafloroetilen (PTFE) ve büyük safen ven greftlerinin açıklık oranlarını karşılaştırmaktır. G ereç ve Yönte mler: Kliniğimizde Ocak 2012-Aralık 2013 tarihleri arasında kro- nik tıkayıcı periferik arter hastalığı (Fontaine evre IIb-4) nedeniyle femoropopliteal baypas ope- rasyonu uygulanan 29 hastanın klinik verileri hastane kayıtlarından retrospektif olarak incelendi, Hastalar kullanılan greftin tipine göre iki gruba ayrıldı: Grup 1deki hastalarda ringli PTFE greft (n=17, ortalama yaş: 62,46±12,24 yıl, kadın/erkek oranı: 6/11); Grup 2deki hastalarda ters çevrilmiş büyük safen ven grefti (n=12, ortalama yaş: 63,16±11,07 yıl, kadın/erkek oranı: 5/7) kullanıldı. Kli- nik veriler ve greftlerin açıklık oranlarını içeren takip bilgileri ameliyattan sonra 12, aya kadar top- landı. Operasyon tekniği ve kullanılacak vasküler greftin tipi operasyonu gerçekleştiren vasküler cerrahlar tarafından belirlenmişti. Bulgular: Otuz gün içinde erken greft yetmezliği hiçbir grupta gözlenmedi. Grup 1deki bir hastada greft oklüzyonu nedeniyle yeniden girişim uygulandı. Bu has- tada takip sonunda greft açıklığı mevcuttu. Bir yıllık primer açıklık oranı Grup 1 ve Grup 2deki has- talarda sırasıyla 94 ve 100 iken, sekonder açıklık oranı her iki grupta da 100 idi. S onuç: Her iki tip greftin bir yıllık açıklık oranlarının femoro-popliteal arter hastalığının tedavisinde tatmin edici dü- zeyde olduğu görüldü. Büyük safen ven grefti PTFE greftten daha az girişim gerektirir gibi görün- mektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALÇINKAYA, A., YILMAZ, S., YILMAZ, C., ÇAĞLI, K., DİKEN, A. İ., AKSOY, E. (2022). Comparison of Expanded Polytetrafluorothylene and Greater SAphenous vein Grafts in Above-Knee Arterial Bypass grafting operatins. Damar Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 29–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/486692

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Thierfelder KM, Meimarakis G, Nikolaou K, Sommer WH, Schmitt P, Kazmierczak PM, et al. Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3 Tesla in patients with advanced periph- eral arterial occlusive disease. PLoS One 2014;9(3):e91078
  2. Bozkurt AK. [Turkish Society of Cardiovascu- lar Surgery Peripheral Artery and Vein Dis- ease Treatment Guide]. İstanbul: Güneş Tıp Kitabevleri; 2008, p.1-65. 3. 4
  3. Swaminathan A, Vemulapalli S, Patel MR, Jones WS. Lower extremity amputation in pe- ripheral artery disease: improving patient out- comes. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2014;10: 417-24. Naoum JJ, Arbid EJ. Bypass surgery in limb salvage: polytetrafluoroethylene prosthetic by- pass. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J 2012; 8(4):43-6. Park KM, Kim YW, Yang SS, Kim DI. Com- 6. parisons between prosthetic vascular graft and saphenous vein graft in femoro-popliteal bypass. Ann Surg Treat Res 2014;87(1):35- 40. Veith FJ, Haimovici H. Femoropopliteal aterosclerotic occlusive disease. In: Haimovici H, Ascer E, Hollier LH, Strandness DE, Towne JB, eds Haimovici’s Vascular Surgery Princi- ples and Techniques. 4th ed. Cambridge Massachusets, USA: Blackwell Science Inc; 1996. p. 605-31
  4. Kurç E, Enç Y, Çınar B. [Graft Material Se- 9. Kolbakır F, Keçeligil HT, Yılman M, Erk M
  5. Albers M, Battistella VM, Romiti M, Rodrigues lection in Femoropopliteal Bypass Surgery [Femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal bypass AA, Pereira CA. Meta-analysis of polytetraflu- and Results of Long Term Graft Patency]. operations]. GKD Cer Derg 1995;3(1):31- oroethylene bypass grafts to infrapopliteal ar- TGKDCD 2000;8(2):616-8. 133. teries. J Vasc Surg 2003;37(6): 1263-9
  6. Rahman A, Azak S. [Infrainguinal femoro- 10. Kunt AS, Darçın OT, Aydın S, Demir D, Andaç 12. Park KM, Park YJ, Yang SS, Kim DI, Kim YW. popliteal bypass operations]. Turkish J MH. Ekstra-anatomik ve femoro-popliteal arter Treatment of failing vein grafts in patients Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;16(4):236- bypass cerrahisi sonuçlarımız. Damar Cer- whounderwent lower extremity arterial bypass, 40. rahisi Dergisi 2004;13(1): 11-5. J Korean Surg Soc 2012;83(5):307-15.