Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4

COMPARISON OF ANXIETY LEVELS AND PERCEPTIONS OF PATIENTS WITH INITIAL PERIODONTAL TREATMENT USING DIFFERENT ANESTHESIA AND INSTRUMENTS

Farklı Anestezi ve Enstrümanlarla Gerçekleştirilen Başlangıç Periodontal Tedavinin Hastaların Anksiyete ve Algı Düzeylerine Etkilerinin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
371–378
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Topicalanesthesia and ultrasonic scaler usage may be moreuseful to patients with dental anxiety

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study is to compareperception and anxiety levels of patients who arereceived different anesthesia and instruments prior toperiodontal treatment.Materials and Methods: The study performed inthe Periodontology Department of PamukkaleUniversity’s Faculty of Dentistry (October 2017-February 2018) and designed as randomizedcontrolled clinical trial. 60 periodontitis patientswere divided into 6 groups: 1-Local piezo, 2-Topicalpiezo, 3- Piezo, 4-Local hand instrument, 5-Topicalhand instrument, 6- Hand instrument.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients were asked tofill dental anxiety scale (DAS) scale before thetreatment and 10th day.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Topicalanesthesia and ultrasonic scaler usage may be moreuseful to patients with dental anxiety
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to compareperception and anxiety levels of patients who arereceived different anesthesia and instruments prior toperiodontal treatment.Materials and Methods: The study performed inthe Periodontology Department of PamukkaleUniversity’s Faculty of Dentistry (October 2017-February 2018) and designed as randomizedcontrolled clinical trial. 60 periodontitis patientswere divided into 6 groups: 1-Local piezo, 2-Topicalpiezo, 3- Piezo, 4-Local hand instrument, 5-Topicalhand instrument, 6- Hand instrument. Topical groupswere received xylocaine spray; local groups werereceived jetocaine ampoule. Patients were asked tofill dental anxiety scale (DAS) scale before thetreatment and 10th day. The visual analogue scale(VAS) was filled out on the day of treatment, on thesecond day and on the 10th day following treatment.Clinical measurements were taken on the treatmentday and on the 30th day.Results: There was a significant decrease in clinicalmeasurements in all groups. Local anesthesia groupsrevealed lower VAS pain values (p0.05). The ultrasonic groupsexhibited lower DAS scores than the handinstrument groups (p>0.05).Conclusion: Local anesthesia provided betterpatients cooperation and VAS pain scores, but didnot yield good speech and chewing scores. Topicalanesthesia and ultrasonic scaler usage may be moreuseful to patients with dental anxiety

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı anestezi teknikleri ve enstrümanlarla yapılan periodontal tedavi uygulanan hastaların algı ve anksiyete düzeylerini karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışma Pamukkale Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Periodontoloji Bölümü'nde (Ekim 2017- Şubat 2018) gerçekleştirildi ve randomize kontrollü klinik çalışma olarak tasarlanmıştır. 60 kronik periodontitis hastası 6 gruba ayrıldı: 1-Lokal piezo, 2-Topikal piezo, 3- Piezo, 4-Lokal el aleti, 5-Topikal el aleti, 6- El aleti. Topikal gruplara xylocain sprey, lokal gruplara ise jetokain ampul uygulandı. Hastalardan, tedavi öncesi ve tedavi sonrası 10. günde dental anksiyete skalasını (DAS) doldurmaları istendi. Görsel analog skala (VAS) tedavi günü, ikinci günü ve tedaviden sonraki 10. günde hastalar tarafından dolduruldu. Klinik ölçümler tedavi öncesi ve tedavi sonrası 30. günde alındı. Bulgular: Tüm gruplarda klinik ölçümlerde anlamlı bir iyileşme gözlendi. Lokal anestezi gruplarında, işlem gününde diğer gruplara göre daha düşük VAS ağrı değerleri (p 0,05). Ultrasonik gruplar, el aleti gruplarından daha düşük DAS skorları sergiledi (p>0,05). Sonuç: Lokal anestezi daha iyi hasta kooperasyonu ve daha az VAS ağrı skorları sağladı, ancak konuşma ve çiğneme skorlarını yükseltti. Topikal anestezi ve ultrasonik scaler ile gerçekleştirilen tedavi, dental anksiyete hastaları için daha yararlı olabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALPAN, A. L. (2022). COMPARISON OF ANXIETY LEVELS AND PERCEPTIONS OF PATIENTS WITH INITIAL PERIODONTAL TREATMENT USING DIFFERENT ANESTHESIA AND INSTRUMENTS. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4, 371–378. https://ajindex.com/articles/476985

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Burt B. Position paper: epidemiology of periodontal diseases. J Periodontol 2005;76:1406-1419
  2. Chung DT, Bogle G, Bernardini M, Stephens D, Riggs ML, Egelberg JH. Pain experienced by patients during periodontal maintenance. J Periodontol 2003;74:1293- 1301
  3. Sherman PR, Hutchens LH, Jr., Jewson LG. The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing. II. Clinical responses related to residual calculus. J Periodontol 1990;61:9-15
  4. Sherman PR, Hutchens LH, Jr., Jewson LG, Moriarty JM, Greco GW, McFall WT, Jr. The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planning. I. Clinical detection of residual calculus. J Periodontol 1990;61:3-8
  5. Ritz L, Hefti AF, Rateitschak KH. An in vitro investigation on the loss of root substance in scaling with various instruments. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18:643-647
  6. Chabanski MB, Gillam DG, Bulman JS, Newman HN. Prevalence of cervical dentine sensitivity in a population of patients referred to a specialist Periodontology Department. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:989-992
  7. Tunkel J, Heinecke A, Flemmig TF. A systematic review of efficacy of machinedriven and manual subgingival debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29 Suppl 3:72-81; discussion 90-71
  8. Christgau M, Manner T, Beuer S, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Periodontal healing after nonsurgical therapy with a modified sonic scaler: a controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2006;33:749-758
  9. Nicoll BK, Peters RJ. Heat generation during ultrasonic instrumentation of dentin as affected by different irrigation methods. J Periodontol 1998;69:884-888. 10.Trenter SC, Walmsley AD. Ultrasonic dental scaler: associated hazards. J Clin Periodontol 2003;30:95-101. 11.Hoffman A, Marshall RI, Bartold PM. Use of the Vector scaling unit in supportive periodontal therapy: a subjective patient evaluation. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:1089- 1093. 12.Definitions" IAftSoPP. Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage Derived from The need of a taxonomy. Pain 1979; 6:10.1016/0304-3959(1079)90046-90040. 13.Corah NL. Development of a dental anxiety scale. J Dent Res 1969;48:596. 14.Corah NL, Gale EN, Illig SJ. Assessment of a dental anxiety scale. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;97:816-819. 15.Boyce RA, Kirpalani T, Mohan N. Updates of Topical and Local Anesthesia Agents. Dent Clin North Am 2016;60:445-471. 16.Kirova DG, Atanasov DT, Lalabonova CK,