SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

COMPARISON OF ORAL HYGIENE ATTITUDES, AWARENESS AND PERIODONTAL PARAMETERS OF UNDERGRADUATE DENTAL STUDENTS

Dişhekimliği Öğrencilerinin Ağız Hijyeni Tutumları, Farkındalıkları ve Periodontal Parametrelerinin Karşılaştırılması

Aysan Lektemur Alpan
Emine Pirim Görgün
Pages
283–291
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Statistically significant difference was in BOP value between 1st and 5th grade (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the differences in selfreported oral health attitudes and clinical measurements between undergraduatedental students who enrolled in or not enrolled in periodontology course inTurkey.Materials and Methods: A total of 701 students were included in the study.Students asked 26 questions including age, gender, smoking, oral hygiene habitsand self-assessment measures for periodontal status.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Chi-square test wasused for categorical data and one way Anova post hoc Tukey test for ordinal leveldata.Results: There were no differences between grades in term of PD and CAL(p>0.05).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Statistically significant difference was in BOP value between 1st and 5th grade (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the differences in selfreported oral health attitudes and clinical measurements between undergraduatedental students who enrolled in or not enrolled in periodontology course inTurkey.Materials and Methods: A total of 701 students were included in the study.Students asked 26 questions including age, gender, smoking, oral hygiene habitsand self-assessment measures for periodontal status. Probing depth (PD) clinicalattachment level (CAL), presence of bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index(PI) and gingival index (GI) measurements performed. The Chi-square test wasused for categorical data and one way Anova post hoc Tukey test for ordinal leveldata.Results: There were no differences between grades in term of PD and CAL(p>0.05). Statistically significant difference was in BOP value between 1st and 5th grade (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye'de periodontoloji dersi alan ve almayan dişhekimliği öğrencileri arasında, kendilerinin bildirdiği ağız sağlığı tutumları ve klinik ölçümler arasındaki farklılıkları karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya toplam 701 öğrenci dahil edildi. Öğrencilere yaş, cinsiyet, sigara içme, ağız hijyeni alışkanlıkları ve periodontal durum gibi öz değerlendirme soruları dahil toplam 26 soru soruldu. Sondlama derinliği (PD), klinik ataçman seviyesi (CAL), sonlamada kanama varlığı (BOP), plak indeksi (PI) ve gingival indeksi (GI) ölçümleri. Kategorik verilerde Ki-kare testi, gruplar arası karşılaştırmalarda tek yönlü varyans analizi posthoc Tukey testi kullanıldı. Bulgular: PD ve CAL açısından sınıflar arasında fark bulunmadı (p>0,05). 1. ve 5. sınıf BOP değerleri arasında anlamlı farklılık bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

Alpan, A. L., Görgün, E. P. (2022). COMPARISON OF ORAL HYGIENE ATTITUDES, AWARENESS AND PERIODONTAL PARAMETERS OF UNDERGRADUATE DENTAL STUDENTS. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 283–291. https://ajindex.com/articles/476943

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Albandar JM, Tinoco EM. Global epidemiology of periodontal diseases in children and young persons. Periodontol 2000 2002;29:153-176
  2. Wong RM, Ng SK, Corbet EF, Keung Leung W. Non-surgical periodontal therapy improves oral healthrelated quality of life. J Clin Periodontol 2012;39:53-61
  3. Kaldahl WB, Kalkwarf KL, Patil KD, Molvar MP. Relationship of gingival bleeding, gingival suppuration, and supragingival plaque to attachment loss. J Periodontol 1990;61:347-351
  4. Dietrich T, Stosch U, Dietrich D, Schamberger D, Bernimoulin JP, Joshipura K. The accuracy of individual self-reported items to determine periodontal disease history. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:135-140
  5. Eke PI, Dye BA, Wei L, et al. Self-reported measures for surveillance of periodontitis. J Dent Res 2013;92:1041-1047
  6. Glavind L, Attstrom R. Periodontal selfexamination. A motivational tool in periodontics. J Clin Periodontol 1979;6:238-251
  7. Joshipura KJ, Douglass CW, Garcia RI, Valachovic R, Willett WC. Validity of a self-reported periodontal disease measure. J Public Health Dent 1996;56:205-212
  8. Gilbert AD, Nuttall NM. Self-reporting of periodontal health status. Br Dent J 1999;186:241-244
  9. Khami MR, Murtomaa H, Jafarian M, Virtanen JI. Knowledge and attitude of Iranian dental school educators towards prevention. Oral Health Prev Dent 2007;5:181-186
  10. Silness J, Loe H. Periodontal Disease in Pregnancy. Ii. Correlation between Oral Hygiene and Periodontal Condtion. Acta Odontol Scand 1964;22:121-135
  11. H L. The gingival index, the plaque index and the retentionindex systems. J Periodontol 1967;38 (Suppl): 610-616
  12. Armitage GC. Development of a classification system for periodontal diseases and conditions. Ann Periodontol 1999;4:1-6
  13. Al-Wahadni AM, Al-Omiri MK, Kawamura M. Differences in self-reported oral health behavior between dental students and dental technology/dental hygiene students in Jordan. J Oral Sci 2004;46:191-197. 14.Rahman B, Kawas SA. The relationship between dental health behavior, oral hygiene and gingival status of dental students in the United Arab Emirates. Eur J Dent 2013;7:22-27. 15. el-Mostehy MR, Zaki HA, Stallard R. The dental student's attitude toward the profession as reflected in his oral cavity. Egypt Dent J 1969;15:104-109
  14. Tangerman A. Halitosis in medicine: a review. Int Dent J 2002;52 Suppl 3:201-206
  15. Miyazaki H, Sakao S, Katoh Y, Takehara T. Correlation between volatile sulphur compounds and certain oral health measureme