Journals / Clinical Dentistry and Research / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1

EFFECT OF SINTERING TIME ON HARDNESS OF MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA

SiNTERLEME SÜRESiNiN MONOLiTiK ZiRKONYA SERTLiğiNE ETKiSi

Pages
38–43
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: The shortening of the sintering time causes a decrease in the hardness of monolithic zirconia

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background and Aim: Porcelain chipping is a common complication in bilayered zirconia restorations, and monolithic zirconia has been developed to overcome this problem.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A total of 24 zirconia specimens (15 x 10 x 5.5 mm) were prepared from presinterized, yttria- stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline (3Y-TZP) ceramic block and then divided into two groups to receive different sintering processes (Control sintering; CS and Rapid sintering; RS).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: The shortening of the sintering time causes a decrease in the hardness of monolithic zirconia
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background and Aim: Porcelain chipping is a common complication in bilayered zirconia restorations, and monolithic zirconia has been developed to overcome this problem. However, limited information is available on the mechanical properties of this new material. Hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of sintering time on Vickers hardness of monolithic zirconia. Materials and Methods: A total of 24 zirconia specimens (15 x 10 x 5.5 mm) were prepared from presinterized, yttria- stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline (3Y-TZP) ceramic block and then divided into two groups to receive different sintering processes (Control sintering; CS and Rapid sintering; RS). Vickers hardness of each sample was measured by applying a 2 kg load for 30 seconds on three different regions using a micro hardness device. The data were analyzed with t-tests (α= 0.05) and crystal sizes were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy. Results: The means and standard deviations of the Vickers hardness values for CS and RS groups were 1416.63 ± 175.5 and 1222.47 ± 75.9, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found between CS and RS (p= 0.003). Conclusions: The shortening of the sintering time causes a decrease in the hardness of monolithic zirconia

Özet

Amaç: Porselen kırılması çift tabakalı zirkonya restorasyonlarda yaygın bir komplikasyondur. Bu sorunun üstesinden gelmek için monolitik zirkonya geliştirilmiştir. Bununla birlikte, bu yeni malzemenin mekanik özellikleri hakkında sınırlı bilgi mevcuttur. Bu nedenle, bu çalışmanın amacı, sinterleme süresinin monolitik zirkonyanın Vickers sertliği üzerindeki etkisini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Presinterize itriya ile stabilize edilmiş tetragonal zirkonya polikristalin (3Y-TZP) seramik bloktan toplam 24 zirkonya örnek (15 x 10 x 5,5 mm) hazırlanmış ve daha sonra farklı sinterleme işlemlerinin (Kontrol sinterleme; CS ve Hızlı sinterleme; RS) uygulanması için iki gruba ayrıldı. Mikro sertlik cihazı kullanılarak üç farklı bölgeye 30 saniye süreyle 2 kg’lık yük uygulanarak her numunenin Vickers sertliği ölçüldü. Veriler t testleri (a= 0.05) ile analiz edildi ve kristal boyutları taramalı elektron mikroskobu kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Vickers sertlik değerlerinin CS ve RS grupları için ortalamaları ve standart sapmaları sırasıyla 1416.63 ± 175.5 ve 1222.47 ± 75.9 idi. CS ve RS arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulundu (p= 0.003). Sonuçlar: Sinterleme süresinin kısaltılması, monolitik zirkonyanın (ikinci jenerasyon) sertliğinde azalmaya neden olmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aktas, G., Güncü, M. B., Avcı, Ö. F., Cege, M. A., Koyuncu, A., Cebı, E. E. (2022). EFFECT OF SINTERING TIME ON HARDNESS OF MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA. Clinical Dentistry and Research, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1, 38–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/474506

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999; 20:20:1-25
  2. Kelly JR, Denry I. Stabilized zirconia as a structural ceramic: An overview. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 289-298
  3. Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Luthy H, Gauckler LJ, Scharer P et al. Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up. Quintessence Int 2006; 37: 685-693
  4. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Survival of Zirconia- and Metal- Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review. Int J Prosthodont 2010; 23: 493-502
  5. Rinke S, Gersdorff N, Lange K, Roediger M. Prospective Evaluation of Zirconia Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures: 7-Year Clinical Results. Int J Prosthodont 2013; 26: 164-171
  6. Teichmann M, Wienert AL, Ruckbeil M, Weber V, Wolfart S, Edelhoff D. Ten-year survival and chipping rates and clinical quality grading of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Invest 2018; 22: 2905-2915
  7. Nistor L, Gradinaru M, Rica R, Marasescu P, Stan M, Manolea H et al. Zirconia Use in Dentistry - Manufacturing and Properties. Curr Health Sci J 2019; 45: 28-35
  8. Pecho OE, Ghinea R, Ionescu AM, Cardona JD, Paravina RD, Perez MD. Color and translucency of zirconia ceramics, human dentine and bovine dentine. J Dent 2012; 40: e34-40
  9. Chen YM, Smales RJ, Yip KHK, Sung WJ. Translucency and biaxial flexural strength of four ceramic core materials. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 1506-1511
  10. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: Core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 4-9
  11. Stawarczyk B, Ozcan M, Hallmann L, Ender A, Mehl A, Hammerlet CHF. The effect of zirconia sintering temperature on flexural strength, grain size, and contrast ratio. Clin Oral Invest 2013; 17: 269-274
  12. Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, Figge D, Edelhoff D, Lumkemann N. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part II. Quintessence Int 2017; 48: 441-450 13. Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, Figge D, Edelhoff D, Lumkemann N. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part I. Quintessence Int 2017; 48: 369-380
  13. Elsaka SE. Optical and Mechanical Properties of Newly Developed Monolithic Multilayer Zirconia. J Prosthodont 2019; 28: E279-E84
  14. Kontonasaki E, Rigos AE, Ilia C, Istantsos T. Monolithic Zirconia: An Update to Current Knowledge. Optical Properties, Wear, and Clinical Performance. Dent J 2019; 7: 90