Journals / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2016 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

Turkish Validation of Patient Satisfaction Towards Patient Oriented Pharmacy Services Questionnaire in Patients with Chronic Disease

Kronik Hastalarda Hasta Odaklı Eczacılık Hizmetleri ile ilgili Memnuniyet Anketinin Türkçe Validasyonu

Pages
150–154
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Three domains (qualityof care, patient–pharmacist relationship, and overall satisfaction) were obtainedin factor analysis of PSPSQ 2.0, as in the original study.Conclusion: In the present study, the Turkish form of PSPSQ 2.0 was determinedto be a reliable and valid scale to assess patients’ satisfaction regardingpatient-oriented pharmacy services.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of the study was to validate the Turkish version of thepatient satisfaction questionnaire that evaluated satisfaction of patientswith chronic diseases regarding pharmacy services.Methods: The present study was conducted between September 2015and November 2015 among patients who had chronic diseases at leastfor 6 months and applied to community pharmacies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After appropriatelanguage translation, pre-test, test–retest validity, and factor analysis wereconducted.Results: The mean age of 154 patients (91 male, 63 female) was 58.6±13.8years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Three domains (qualityof care, patient–pharmacist relationship, and overall satisfaction) were obtainedin factor analysis of PSPSQ 2.0, as in the original study.Conclusion: In the present study, the Turkish form of PSPSQ 2.0 was determinedto be a reliable and valid scale to assess patients’ satisfaction regardingpatient-oriented pharmacy services.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kronik hastalık · hasta memnuniyeti · hasta odaklı eczane hizmetleri

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to validate the Turkish version of thepatient satisfaction questionnaire that evaluated satisfaction of patientswith chronic diseases regarding pharmacy services.Methods: The present study was conducted between September 2015and November 2015 among patients who had chronic diseases at leastfor 6 months and applied to community pharmacies. After appropriatelanguage translation, pre-test, test–retest validity, and factor analysis wereconducted.Results: The mean age of 154 patients (91 male, 63 female) was 58.6±13.8years. The mean score of the Patient-Oriented Pharmacy Services Questionnaire(PSPSQ) 2.0 was 3.29±0.47, and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficientwas 0.944. A strong correlation was determined between the test–retestvalidity of the total and subscale scores (p<0.001). Three domains (qualityof care, patient–pharmacist relationship, and overall satisfaction) were obtainedin factor analysis of PSPSQ 2.0, as in the original study.Conclusion: In the present study, the Turkish form of PSPSQ 2.0 was determinedto be a reliable and valid scale to assess patients’ satisfaction regardingpatient-oriented pharmacy services.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada kronik hastalıklarda eczacılık hizmetleri ile ilgili hasta memnuniyet

🔖

Cite This Article

SANCAR, M., İZZETTİN, F. V., AY, P., OKUYAN, B., HÜCUM, H. (2022). Turkish Validation of Patient Satisfaction Towards Patient Oriented Pharmacy Services Questionnaire in Patients with Chronic Disease. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 150–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/474485

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Adepu R, Nagavi BG. General practitioners’ perceptions about the extended roles of the community pharmacists in the State of Karnataka: A study. Indian J Pharm Sci 2006; 68: 36-40. [CrossRef] 2. Prakash B. Patient Satisfaction. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2010; 3: 151-5. [CrossRef] 3. Thiedke CC. What Do We Really Know About Patient Satisfaction? Fam Pract Manag 2007; 14: 33-6. 4. Farley H, Enguidanos ER, Coletti CM, Honigman L, Mazzeo A, Pinson TB, et al. Patient satisfaction surveys and quality of care: an information paper. Ann Emerg Med 2014; 64: 351-7. [CrossRef] 5. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales, New York. NY: Oxford University Press; 2002. 6. Sakharkar P, Bounthavong M, Hirsch JD, Morello CM, Chen TC, Law AV. Development and validation of PSPSQ 2.0 measuring patient satisfaction with pharmacist services. Res Social Adm Pharm 2015; 11: 487-98. [CrossRef] 7. Gourley G, Gourley D, Rigolosi La ME, Reed P, Solomon D, Washington E. Development and validation of the pharmaceutical care satisfaction questionnaire. Am J Manag Care 2001; 7: 461-6.