Journals / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2023 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 3

Comparison of the Hall Technique and Conventional Compomer Restorations: A 60-Month Follow-up

Pages
541–548
Publication Date
2023-09-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Hall Technique had a similar survival rate to the conventional compomer restorations as well as low failure findings in caries management in primary molars.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The Hall Technique is one biological strategy for sealing carious lesions with preformed metal crowns in primary molars.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to compare the Hall Technique's survival rate with conventional compomer restorations in caries management in primary molars for 60 months.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Hall Technique had a similar survival rate to the conventional compomer restorations as well as low failure findings in caries management in primary molars.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Carious dentin · dental caries · Hall Technique

Abstract

Objective: The Hall Technique is one biological strategy for sealing carious lesions with preformed metal crowns in primary molars. This study aimed to compare the Hall Technique's survival rate with conventional compomer restorations in caries management in primary molars for 60 months. Methods: Children with preformed metal crowns placed with Hall Technique and conventional compomer restorations were invited to Pediatric Dentistry Clinics for a 60-month follow-up. The restorations of these children were evaluated clinically and radiographically. Dental health records of 12 and 24-month follow-up appointments were obtained from the electronic archive. The survival rate of the restorations was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and the success/failure of the restorations by the Chi-Square test. Restorations with finding such as secondary caries, pulpitis, restoration wear/fracture/loss, crown perforation, inter-radicular radiolucency, and internal root resorption were scored according to major and/or minor failure criteria, while satisfactory ones were scored as successful. Results: Twenty-six primary molars were included in the study. There was no significant difference in the survival rates of preformed metal crowns placed with the Hall Technique (92.3%) and conventional compomer restorations (84.6%) at 60-month follow-up (2 = 2.455, p = .48). The Hall Technique (84.6%) was found significantly more successful clinically and radiographically compared to conventional compomer restorations (23.1%) according to the success or failure criteria in 60-month follow-up (p < .01). Conclusion: The Hall Technique was clinically and radiographically more successful than conventional compomer restorations according to the success or failure criteria at 60-month follow-up. The Hall Technique had a similar survival rate to the conventional compomer restorations as well as low failure findings in caries management in primary molars.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAVUZ, B. Ş., KARGUL, B. (2023). Comparison of the Hall Technique and Conventional Compomer Restorations: A 60-Month Follow-up. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 3, 541–548. https://ajindex.com/articles/961653

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, Ezzati M, Shibuya K, Salomon JA, Abdalla S, Aboyans V. Disability-adjusted life years 20 (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: A 21 systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet 2012;380(9859):2197-2223. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4
  2. Ricketts DN, Pitts NB. Traditional operative treatment options. Monogr Oral Sci. 2009;21:164-173. DOI: 10.1159/000224221 Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme. Prevention and management of dental caries in children, dental clinical guidance. Scotland, Dundee: NHS education for Scotland. Published [2010]. Updated [May 2018]. Accessed [16 April 2022]. http://www.sdcep.org.uk/published-guidance/caries-in-children/. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on caries-risk assessment and management for infants, children, and adolescents. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry. Chicago, IL. Published [2013]. Updated [2022]. Accessed [16 April 2022]. http://www.aapd.org/media/Policies_Guidelines/G_CariesRiskAssessment.pdf.
  3. Schwendicke F, Frencken J, Innes N. Current concepts in carious tissue removal. Curr Oral Health Rep. 2018;5(3):154-162. DOI: 10.1007/s40496-018-0183-1
  4. Innes NPT, Evans D. Modern approaches to caries management of the primary dentition. Br Dent J. 2013;214(11):559-566. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.529 Innes NPT, Stirrups DR, Evans DJP, Hall N, Leggate M. A novel technique using preformed metal crowns for managing carious primary molars in general practice - A retrospective analysis. Br Dent J. 2006;200(8):451-454. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4813466 Hesse D, Araujo MP, Olegario IC, Innes N, Raggio DP, Bonifacio CC. Atraumatic restorative treatment compared to the hall technique for occluso-proximal cavities in primary molars: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2016;17(1):169. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1270-z Altoukhi DH, El-Housseiny AA. Hall technique for carious primary molars: A review of the literature. Dent J (Basel). 2020;8(1):E11. DOI: 10.3390/dj8010011 Badar SB, Tabassum S, Khan FR, Ghafoor R. Effectiveness of hall technique for primary carious molars: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019;12(5):445–452. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1666
  5. AlHalabi M, Salami A, Alnuaimi E, Kowash M, Hussein I. Assessment of paediatric dental guidelines and caries management alternatives in the post COVID‑19 period. A critical review and clinica