Journals / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

A panel causality analysis of the relationship between financial development and economic growth in OECD countries

Pages
662–672
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study results provide compelling evidence for the relationship between economic growth and financial development since the sample includes countries with different levels of financial development with different degrees of per capita GDP growth.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the relationship between financial development and economic growth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, we used a panel of 16 OECD countries from 2008 to 2019 to provide evidence of whether the supply leading hypothesis or demand following hypothesis or both holds.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study results provide compelling evidence for the relationship between economic growth and financial development since the sample includes countries with different levels of financial development with different degrees of per capita GDP growth.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between financial development and economic growth. Thus, this study aims to find empirical shreds of evidence for the direction of the causality between financial development proxied by domestic credit to the private sector and per capita GDP growth by using the panel granger causality test of the Dumitrescu-Hurlin Test. For this purpose, we used a panel of 16 OECD countries from 2008 to 2019 to provide evidence of whether the supply leading hypothesis or demand following hypothesis or both holds. All econometric exercises are carried out for whole countries and high-income countries, and upper-middle-income country groups in the sample. Due to cross-sectional dependence among the sample countries, we determine the degree of integration of each variable by employing the second-generation panel unit root tests of CIPS. We continue our analysis with the panel causality test developed by Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012) to determine the direction of the causality between variables. For this purpose, we performed three sets of causality analyses. In the first one, we include all countries in the panel. We then divided the countries into two sub-groups based on the income classification and the level of financial development in these countries proxied by domestic credit to the private sector. The causality test results, including all countries in the sample, indicate that the hypothesis holds the supply leading hypothesis during the sample period. This means that even though this panel contains countries with a development level, financial development still seems to be a pre-condition for economic growth for these nations. We also obtain the same results when we include high-income countries in the sample. The study results provide compelling evidence for the relationship between economic growth and financial development since the sample includes countries with different levels of financial development with different degrees of per capita GDP growth.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜÇÜKSAKARYA, S. (2022). A panel causality analysis of the relationship between financial development and economic growth in OECD countries. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 662–672. https://ajindex.com/articles/470380

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Adu, G., G. Marbuah, & J. T. Mensah. (2013). Financial Development and Economic Growth in Ghana: Does the Measure of Financial Development Matter? Review of Development Finance 3:192–203.
  2. Andriansyah, A., & Messinis, G. (2019). Stock prices, exchange rates and portfolio equity flows: A TodaYamamoto panel causality test. Journal of Economic Studies. Ang, J. B., & McKibbin, W. J. (2007). Financial liberalization, financial sector development and growth: evidence from Malaysia. Journal of development economics,84(1), 215-233.
  3. Akinlo, A. E., & Akinlo, O. O. (2009). Stock Market Development and Economic Growth: Evidence from Seven Sub-Sahara African Countries. Journal of Economics and Business 61 (2):162–71.
  4. Search in Google Scholar Akinlo, A. E., & Egbetunde, T. (2010). Financial development and economic growth: The experience of 10 sub-Saharan African countries revisited. The review of finance and banking, 2(1). Athanasios, V., & Antonios, A. (2012). Stock market development and economic growth an empirical analysis for Greece. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 4(2), 135. Bayar, Y., Kaya, A., & Yildirim, M. (2014). Effects of stock market development on economic growth: Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Financial Research, 5(1), 93. Beck T., Levine R. & Loyaza N. (2000). Finance and the sources of growth. J. Financ. Econ., 58: 261-300. Bencivenga V.R. & Smith B.D. (1991). Financial development and endogenous growth. Rev. Econ. Stud., 58: 195-209
  5. Bencivenga V., Smith B. & Starr R. (1995). Transaction costs, technological choice and endogenous growth. J. Econ. Theory, 67: 153-177.
  6. Bist, J. P. (2018). Financial development and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of 16 African and non-African low-income countries. Cogent Economics & Finance, 6(1), 1449780. Breusch, T.S & Pagan, A.R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification Tests in Econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47, 239-53.
  7. De Gregorio, Jose, & Pablo E. Guidotti. (1995). Financial development and economic growth. World development, Vol 23 (3), 433-448.
  8. Demetriades, P. O., & Hussein, K. A. (1996). Does financial development cause economic growth? Timeseries evidence from 16 countries. Journal of development Economics, 51(2), 387-411.
  9. Ductor, L., & Grechyna, D. (2015). Financial development, real sector, and economic growth. International Review of Economics & Finance, 37, 393-405.
  10. Dumitrescu, E. I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Tes