Journals / Arkeoloji Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 17

THE RELATIONSHIPS between PERGAMON and AIGIAI in ANCIENT PERIOD

Antik Dönemde Pergamon-Aigai İlişkileri

Pages
81–91
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In particular, the two statues bearing the signature of the sculptor Menestratos of Pergamon,the most important evidence of the relationship between these.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Hellenistic kingdom of Pergamon is one of the most important political and economic forces and it hasremarkable close relationships with the ancient city of Aigai.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After the peace treaty of Apamea in 188, Aigai, Pergamoneffect is particularly strong in terms of architecture and urban planning.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In particular, the two statues bearing the signature of the sculptor Menestratos of Pergamon,the most important evidence of the relationship between these.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Hellenistic kingdom of Pergamon is one of the most important political and economic forces and it hasremarkable close relationships with the ancient city of Aigai. Philetairos the first ruler of the Kingdomof Pergamon have made donations to the Aigai and Temple of Apollo Chresterios and tried to show theimpact on the city. However, especially in the first half of the third century, Aigai was influenced by theKingdom of Seleucid instead of Pergamon. After the peace treaty of Apamea in 188, Aigai, Pergamoneffect is particularly strong in terms of architecture and urban planning. Ceramic findings and works ofsculpture from the excavations at Aigai, tangible evidence of the direct relationship that exists with thePergamon. In particular, the two statues bearing the signature of the sculptor Menestratos of Pergamon,the most important evidence of the relationship between these.

Özet

Hellenistik Dönemin en önemli siyasi ve ekonomik güçlerinden olan Pergamon Krallığı ile Aigai antikkenti arasındaki yakın ilişkiler dikkat çekicidir. Pergamon Krallığının ilk hükümdarı olan PhiletairosAigai kentine ve oradaki Apollon Khresterios Tapınağına yardımlarda bulunarak kent üzerinde gücünüve etkisini göstermeye çalışmıştır. Fakat Aigai, özellikle İ.Ö. 3. yüzyılın ilk yarısında, Pergamondan çokSeleukos Krallığının etkisinde kalmıştır. İ.Ö. 188 yılındaki Apamea Barış Antlaşması ardından kenttekiPergamon etkisi, özellikle şehir plancılığı ve mimari açıdan, güçlü bir şekilde görülmektedir. Aigai kazı- larında ele geçen seramik buluntular ve heykeltıraşlık eserleri Aigai ve Pergamon arasındaki doğrudanilişkinin maddi kanıtlarıdır. Özellikle, Pergamonlu heykeltraş Menestratos imzası taşıyan iki heykel sözkonusu ilişkinin en önemli kanıtları arasındadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEZGİN, Y. (2022). THE RELATIONSHIPS between PERGAMON and AIGIAI in ANCIENT PERIOD. Arkeoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 17, 81–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/448295

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akarca 1972:
  2. A. Akarca, Yunan Arkeolojisinin Ana Çizgileri Şehir ve Savunması, I, Ankara. Allen 1983:
  3. R. E. Allen, The Attalid Kingdom: a Constitutional History, Oxford. Aperghıs 2004:
  4. G.G. Aperghis, The Seleukid Royal Economy: The Finances and Financial Administration of the Seleukid Empire, Cambridge University Press. Arslan 2000:
  5. M. Arslan, Galatlar. Antikçağ Anadolusu’nun Savaşçı Kavimi, İstanbul. Bean 1966: G.E. Bean, “Two Inscriptions from Aeolis”, Belleten, XXX, 525-538. Bıeber 1961:
  6. M. Bieber, The Sculpture of the Hellenistic Age, Revised Edition, New York. Bohn ve Schuchhardt 1898: R. Bohn, C. Schuchhardt, Altertümer von Aegae, Berlin. Brıngmann ve Steuben 1995:
  7. K. Bringmann, H. Steuben, Schenkungen hellenistischer Herrscher an griechische Städte und Heiligtümer. Teil 1: Zeugnisse und Kommentare, Berlin. Clerc 1886: M.A. Clerc, “Les ruines d’Aegae en Éolie”, BCH, 10, 275-296. Conze ve Schazmann 1911:
  8. A. Conze, P. Schazmann, Mamurt-Kaleh: Ein Tempel der Göttermutter un- weit Pergamon, Berlin. Coulson 1980: W.D.E. Coulson, “Menestratos”, CIJ, 75- 3, 200-203. Coulton 1976:
  9. J.J. Coulton, The Architectural Development of the Greek Stoa, Oxford Doğer vd. 2008:
  10. E. Doğer, L. Doğer, Ş. Tül, Y. Sezgin, M. Önder, S. Akat, M.H. Kan, B. Yener, E. Dereboylu, Ü. Türkan, E. Atay, M. Şahan, F. Genç, O.K. Serttürk, İ.S. Çakır, “Aigai 2004-2006 Yılı Kazıları”, KST, 29- 1, 207-232. Fabrıcus 1885: E. Fabricus, “Der Tempel des Apollon Chresterios bei Aigai”, AM, 10, 272-274. Forbes 1966:
  11. R.J. Forbes, Studies in Ancient Technology, Vol. 5, Brill, Leiden. Gruen 2000: E.S. Gruen, “Culture as Policy: The Attalids of Pergamon”, N.T. Grummond - B.S. Ridgway (Ed.), From Pergamon to Sperlonga: Sculpture and Context, Berkeley, 17-31. Hansen 1971:
  12. E.V. Hansen, The Attalids of Pergamon2, Ithaca-London. Hayes 2008:
  13. J. Hayes, The Athenian Agora. Volume XXXII. Roman Pottery Fine-Ware Imports, Princeton, New Jersey. Hoepfner 1997: W. Hoepfner, “The Architecture of Pergamon”, R. Dreyfuss – E. Schraudolph, Pergamon: The Telephos Frieze from the Great Altar, v. 2, Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, 23-57. Houghton 1992: A. Houghton, “The Royal Seleucid Mint of Aegae in Aeolia”, RNum, 6., No. 34, 229- 232. Humphrey 2006:
  14. J.W. Humphrey, Ancient Technology, London. Hübner 1993:
  15. G. Hübner, Die Applikenkeramik von Pergamon. Eine Bildersprache im Dienst des Herr scherkultes, Pergamenische Forschungen 7, Berlin. Japp 2009: S. Japp, “Archäometrisch-archäologische Untersuchungen an Keramik au