Journals / Arkeoloji Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 19

PAPHLAGONİA HADRİANOUPOLİS İ ERKEN BİZANS B KİLİSESİ MOZAİKLERİ VE İKONOGRAFİK ANALİZİ

Mosaics of Early Byzantine Church B in Paphlagonian Hadrianoupolis and Their Iconographic Analysis

Pages
183–208
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We sincerely hope that, this article would be a humble example for theidetification, classification and comparison criteria which have not been yet settled properly by the nativeresearchers; and for the significant iconographic matters which are mostly passed over with short reviewsin the research field of Anatolian mosaics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, mosaics of Early Byzantine Church B and iconographic analysis of these mosaics located inPaphlagonia Hadrianoupolis in Eskipazar district in Karabuk city of Turkey s Western Black Sea regionare examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Church B has floor mosaics dating to two different phases, initially, first half of the 6thcentury A.D. and latter, beginning of the 7th century A.D.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We sincerely hope that, this article would be a humble example for theidetification, classification and comparison criteria which have not been yet settled properly by the nativeresearchers; and for the significant iconographic matters which are mostly passed over with short reviewsin the research field of Anatolian mosaics.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this paper, mosaics of Early Byzantine Church B and iconographic analysis of these mosaics located inPaphlagonia Hadrianoupolis in Eskipazar district in Karabuk city of Turkey s Western Black Sea regionare examined. Church B has floor mosaics dating to two different phases, initially, first half of the 6thcentury A.D. and latter, beginning of the 7th century A.D. The first phase mosaic has an unique placeamong Anatolian mosaics with its geometrical designs, figurative ornaments and manifacture quality.The Rivers of Paradise scene treated in a rectangular panel located in the naos of the church, is a sig- nificant subject which is particularly seen in Early Byzantine Period. The Rivers of Paradise scene andthe other figurative scenes are predominantly handled subjects by us. Besides, identification of the restof the mosaic patterns, evaluation and comparison with similar examples throughout various cities aretried to be thoroughly explained. We sincerely hope that, this article would be a humble example for theidetification, classification and comparison criteria which have not been yet settled properly by the nativeresearchers; and for the significant iconographic matters which are mostly passed over with short reviewsin the research field of Anatolian mosaics.

Özet

Bu makalede, Türkiyenin Batı Karadeniz kentlerinden Karabük İli, Eskipazar İlçesinde yer alan Paphla- gonia Hadrianoupolisi Erken Bizans B Kilisesi mozaiklerine ve bu mozaiklerin ikonografik değerlendir- mesine yer verilmiştir. Kilise B, İ.S. 6. yüzyılın ilk yarısı ve 7. yüzyılın başına tarihlenen iki farklı evreyeait zemin mozaiklerine sahiptir. Kilisenin ilk evre mozaiği, geometrik tasarımları, figüratif süslemeleri veyapım kalitesi ile Anadolu mozaikleri içerisinde eşsiz bir yere sahiptir. Kilisenin naosundaki dikdörtgenbir panoya işlenen Cennet Nehirleri sahnesi, özellikle Erken Hristiyanlık Dönemi sanatında karşılaşılanönemli bir konudur. Cennet Nehirleri ve bu sahne dışında kalan diğer figüratif sahneler, tarafımızdanağırlıklı olarak ele alınan konular olmuştur. Ancak, diğer tüm mozaik tasarımlarının tanımlanmaları- na, farklı coğrafyalardaki benzerleri ile karşılaştırılma ve değerlendirmelerine ayrıntılı bir şekilde yerverilmeye çalışılmıştır. Anadolu mozaikleri araştırma sahası içerisinde, yerli araştırmacılar tarafındanhenüz rayına oturtulamamış tanımlama, sınıflandırma ve karşılaştırma kriterleri için ve çoğu zaman kısadeğerlendirmelerle geçiştirilen önemli ikonografik meseleler adına, bu makalenin naçizane hazırlanmışbir örnek olacağını temenni ediyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

PATACI, S., ALTUN, S. (2022). PAPHLAGONİA HADRİANOUPOLİS İ ERKEN BİZANS B KİLİSESİ MOZAİKLERİ VE İKONOGRAFİK ANALİZİ. Arkeoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 19, 183–208. https://ajindex.com/articles/448286

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aksoy 2007: E. Aksoy, “Severan Mosaics of Antioch A Stylistic Study”, III. Uluslararası TürkiyeMozaik Korpusu Sempozyumu Bildirileri, (Ed. M. Şahin) (8-10 Haziran 2006),
  2. Uludağ Üniversitesi,
  3. Mozaik Araştırmaları Merkezi, Bursa, 79-92. Anastos 1946: M. V. Anastos, “The Alexandrian Origin of the Christian Topography of Cosmas Indicopleustes”, Dumbarton Oaks Papers, Vol. 3, 73-80. Andelkovic et al. 2011:
  4. J. Andelkovic, D. Rogic, E. Nikolic, “Peacock as a Sign in the LateAntique and Early Christian Art”, Archaeology and Science 6, Archeological Institute Belgrade, 231-248. Arav et al. 1990:
  5. R. Arav, L. Di Segni, A. Kloner, “An Eighth Century Monastery Near Jerusalem”,Liber Annuus 40, Jerusalem, 313-320. Balmelle et al. 1985:
  6. C. Balmelle, M. Blanchard- Lemée, J. Christop he, J-P. Darmon, A-M. Guimier-Sorbets, H. Lavagne, R. Prudhomme and H. Stern, Le décor géométrique de la mosaïque ro- maine, Répertoire graphique et descriptif des com- positions linéaires et isotropes, Paris. Balmelle 1990: C. Balmelle, “Quelques images de mosaïques à xenia hors de Tunisie”, Xenia, « Recherches franco-tunisiennes sur la mosaïque de l’Afrique antique-I, École Française de Rome, 51- 66. Balmelle et al. 2002:
  7. C. Balmelle, M. Blanchard- Lemée, J-P. Darmon, S. Gozlan, M.-P. Raynaud, Le décor géométrique de la mosaïque romaine II, Répertoire graphique et descriptif des décors cen- trés, Paris. Balty 1977:
  8. J. Balty, Mosaïques antiques de Syrie, Centre Belge de Recherches Archéologiques à Apamée de Syrie, Bruxelles. Balty 1981: J. Balty, “La mosaïques antiques au proche- orient I: Des origines à la tétrarchie”,Aufstieg und Niedergang Der Römischen Welt II.12.2, (Ed. Hildegard Temporini ve Wolfgang Haase), 347-429. Balty 1995:
  9. J. Balty, Mosaïques antiques du proche- orient: Chronologie, iconographie, interprétation, Centre de Recherches d’Histoire Ancienne Vol. 140, Les Belles Lettres, Paris. Barbet 2004: A. Barbet, “Un des programmes iconographiques des peintures de Zeugma (note d’information)”, Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, 148e année, N. 4, 1591-1605. Beksaç 2003: E. Beksaç, “Adramytteion/Ören 2001 Kazısı”, 24. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, 1. Cilt, T.C. Kültür Bakanlığı Anıtlar ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, 85-94. Ben Abed 2006:
  10. A. Ben Abed, Tunisian Mosaics: Treasures from Roman Africa, Translated from the French by Sharon Grevet, The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles. Berti 1986: F. Berti, “I Mosaici Degli Edifici di Culto