Journals / Arkeoloji Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 25

RECONSIDERATION OF CHRONOLOGY AND TERMINOLOGY OF WESTERN ANATOLIAN COAST

Kıyı Batı Anadolu’nun Kronolojisi ve Terminolojisinin Yeniden Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
45–66
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although the excavations and surface surveys in the Western Anatolia have increased recently, there still continue to be difficulties in placing the prehistoric sequence into a chronological frame.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Considering multiple criteria, in this article, the chronology of Western Anatolian Coast from the Epi-paleolithic period to the end of the Chalcolithic period has been tried to establish.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Radiocarbon dates obtained from ongoing excavations also contribute to the reconstruction of the chronological sequence of the region.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although the excavations and surface surveys in the Western Anatolia have increased recently, there still continue to be difficulties in placing the prehistoric sequence into a chronological frame.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Considering multiple criteria, in this article, the chronology of Western Anatolian Coast from the Epi-paleolithic period to the end of the Chalcolithic period has been tried to establish. Radiocarbon dates obtained from ongoing excavations also contribute to the reconstruction of the chronological sequence of the region. Although the excavations and surface surveys in the Western Anatolia have increased recently, there still continue to be difficulties in placing the prehistoric sequence into a chronological frame.

Özet

Bu makalede çoklu kriterler göz önüne alınarak, Batı Anadolu Kıyı Bölgesi’nin Epi-paleolitik dönemden Kalkolitik Çağ’ın sonuna kadar uzanan kronolojisi tekrardan tesis edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Süregelen kazılardan elde edilen radyokarbon tarihleri de bölgenin kronolojik sekansının yeniden kurgulanmasında önemli katkı sağlamaktadır. Batı Anadolu’daki kazılar ve yüzey araştırmalarından elde edilen veriler son yıllarda artış göstermiş olsa da prehistorik kültür silsilesini zamansal bir çerçeve içine yerleştirmek hala oldukça zordur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDOĞU, B., ÇEVİK, Ö. (2022). RECONSIDERATION OF CHRONOLOGY AND TERMINOLOGY OF WESTERN ANATOLIAN COAST. Arkeoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 25, 45–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/448218

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Atakuman vd. 2020:
  2. Atakuman Ç., Erdoğu B., Gemici H.C., Baykara, İ., Karakoç M., Biagi, P., Starnini, E., Guilbeau, D., Yücel, N., Turan, D. “Before the Neolithic in the Aegean: The Late Pleistocene and the Early Holocene Record of Bozburun- Southwest Turkey”, Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1556489 4.2020.1803458. Atakuman vd. 2017:
  3. Atakuman Ç., Gemici H.C., Karamurat C. & Erdoğu B. “Gökçeada-Uğurlu Höyük’te Bulunan Neolitik ve Kalkolitik Dönem Figürinler”, AST 33.1, 175-187. Atakuman vd. 2018:
  4. Atakuman Ç., Erdoğu B., Karakoç M., Gemici H.C. & Yücel N. “Bozburun Prehistorik Yüzey Araştırması 2017”, AST 33.1, 379-392. Aydıngün 2009:
  5. Aydıngün, Ş. “Early Neolithic Discoveries at İstanbul”, Antiquity 83- issue 320 Kaynak: http://ac.uk/projgall/aydingun/ Baırd vd. 2018:
  6. Baird D., Fairbairn A., Jenkins E.,Martin L.,Middleton C.,Pearson J.,Asouti E.,Edwards Y., Kabukcu C.,Mustafaoğlu G.,Russell N., Bar- Yosef O., Jacobsen G., Wu X., Baker A., Elliott S. “Agricultural origins on the Anatolian plateau”, PNAS 3;115(14), E3077-E3086. www.pnas.org/cgi/ doi/10.1073/pnas.1800163115. Baırd vd 2012:
  7. Baird D. “Pınarbaşı; from Epipalaeolithic campsite to sedentarising village in central Anatolia”. In: M. Özdoğan & N. Başgelen (Eds.), Neolithic in Turkey: New excavations, New Research. Central Turkey. İstanbul, 1-36. Baysal ve Erdoğu 2014:
  8. Baysal E. ve Erdoğu B. “Frog in the Pond: Gökçeada (Imbros), an Aegean Stepping-stone in the Chalcolithic use of Spondylus Shell”, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 80, 363-378. Bertram ve Karul 2014: Bertram J.-K & Karul N. “Anmerkungen zur Stratigraphie des Kumtepe. Die Ergebnisse der Grabungen in den Jahren 1994 und 1995”, In: E. Pernicka, C. B. Rose & P. Jablonka (Eds.), Troia 1987–2012:
  9. Grabungen und Forschungen I, Bonn,1058-1084. Blum 2014:
  10. Blum S. “The Middle Chalcolithic Cultural Sequence of the Troad (Northwest Anatolia): Chronological and Interregional Assessment”, In: B. Horejs & M. Mehofer (Eds.), Western Anatolia before Troy: proto-urbanisation in the 4th millennium BC?, Vienna, 125-156. Boz ve Erdoğu 2 019: B oz B. v e E rdoğu B. “A s ixthmillennium BC burial pit at Uğurlu on the island of Gökçeada”, Antiquity Project Gallery 93 – issue 369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2019.54. Bramı vd. 2016:
  11. Brami M., Horejs B. & Ostmann F. “The ground beneath their feet: building continuity at Neolithic Çukuriçi Höyük”, AntSt 66,1-16. Caymaz 2010:
  12. Caymaz, T., Yeni buluntular Işığında O