SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Arkeoloji Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 26

Technological Marks on Pot Bases fromChalcolithic Gülpınar

[KALKOLİTİK GÜLPINAR ÇANAK ÇÖMLEKLERİ ÜZERİNDEKİ TEKNOLOJİK İZLER]

Ayşe ÖZDEMİR
Abdulkadir ÖZDEMİR
Pages
47–64
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The negative impressions of mats, baskets, cloth, or tree leaves on pot bases result from their use as primitive turntables.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This essay aims to examine the technological marks observed on the pot bases from the Chalcolithic site of Gülpınar in northwestern Anatolia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These technological marks, which are mainly related to stage of the forming of the pots, represents the negative impressions of mats, baskets, cloth, and tree leaves, as well as finger prints.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The negative impressions of mats, baskets, cloth, or tree leaves on pot bases result from their use as primitive turntables.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This essay aims to examine the technological marks observed on the pot bases from the Chalcolithic site of Gülpınar in northwestern Anatolia. These technological marks, which are mainly related to stage of the forming of the pots, represents the negative impressions of mats, baskets, cloth, and tree leaves, as well as finger prints. These negative impressions on pot bases are characteristic of both Early Chalcolithic (phase II) and Middle Chalcolithic period (phase III) at Gülpınar and they appear almost on pot bases recovered from the site during excavations. Examination of these technological marks in the shape of negative impressions on pot bases from Gülpınar help us to obtain information on the techniques used to make the woollen cloth, mats, and baskets and what kind of raw materials were used in their production. The negative impressions of mats, baskets, cloth, or tree leaves on pot bases result from their use as primitive turntables.

Özet

his essay aims to examine the technological marks observed on the pot bases from the Chalcolithic siteof Gülpınar in northwestern Anatolia. These technological marks, which are mainly related to stage ofthe forming of the pots, represents the negative impressions of mats, baskets, cloth, and tree leaves, aswell as finger prints. These negative impressions on pot bases are characteristic of both Early Chalcolithic(phase II) and Middle Chalcolithic period (phase III) at Gülpınar and they appear almost on pot basesrecovered from the site during excavations. Examination of these technological marks in the shape ofnegative impressions on pot bases from Gülpınar help us to obtain information on the techniques usedto make the woollen cloth, mats, and baskets and what kind of raw materials were used in their produc tion. The negative impressions of mats, baskets, cloth, or tree leaves on pot bases result from their use asprimitive turntables.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, A., ÖZDEMİR, A. (2022). Technological Marks on Pot Bases fromChalcolithic Gülpınar. Arkeoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 26, 47–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/448213

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Adovasio and Illingworth 2003:
  2. M.J. Adovasio, J.S. Illingworth, “Basketry and Textile Impressions” In: E.S. Elster, C. Renfrew (Eds.) Prehistoric Sitagroi: Excavations in Northeast Greece, 1968- 1970, vol. 2: The Final Report, Los Angeles, 252- 257. Bennison-Chapman and Hager 2018: Lucy E. Bennison-Chapman, Lori D. Hager, “Tracking the division of labour through handprints: Applying Reflectance Transformation Imaging (RTI) to clay’tokens’ in Neolithic West Asia”, Journal of Archaeological Science 99: 112-123. Carrington Smith 1977: J. Carrington-Smith, “Cloth and Mat Impressions” In: J. Coleman, (Ed.) Keos I. Kephala: A Late Neolithic Settlement and Cemetry, Volume I, Princeton, 114-125. Carrington Smith 2000: J. Carrington-Smith, “The spinning and weaving implements” In: Ridley, C, K.A. Wardle, C. A. Mould (Eds.) Servia: AngloHellenic Rescue Excavations 1971-73, (British School at Athens, Supplement 32), London, 207- 263. Carter et al. 2003:
  3. E. Carter, S. Campell, S. Gauld, “Elusive Complexity: New Data from Late Halaf Domuztepe in South Central Turkey”, Paleorient 29: 117-134. Crowfoot 1934: G.M. Crowfoot, “The Mat Looms of Huleh, Palestine”, Palestine Exploration Quarterly 66: 195-198. Çevik 2018: Ö. Çevik, “What follows the Late Neolithic occupation in central-western Anatolia? A view from Ulucak?” In: S. Dietz, F. Mavridis, Z. Tankosic, T. Takaoğlu (Eds.), Communities in Transition: The Circum-Aegean Later Neolithic Stage (ca. 5000/4800-3200/3000 BC, Oxford, 506-512. Çilingiroğlu and Çilingiroğlu 2007:
  4. A. Çilingiroğlu, Ç. Çilingiroğlu, “Ulucak” In: M. Özdoğan, N. Başgelen (Eds.) Türkiye’de Neolitik Dönem: Yeni Kazılar, Yeni Bulgular, İstanbul, 2007, 361-372. Çilingiroğlu et al. 2012:
  5. A. Çilingiroğlu, Ö. Çevik, Ç. Çilingiroğlu, “Ulucak Höyük” In: M. Özdoğan, N. Başgelen, P. Kuniholm (Eds.) The Neolithic in Turkey. New Excavations & New Research, Volume 4. Western Turkey, İstanbul, 139-75. Erim-Özdoğan 2012: A. Erim-Özdoğan, “Çayönü” In: M. Özdoğan, N. Başgelen, P. Kuniholm (Eds.) The Neolithic in Turkey. New Excavations & New Research, Volume 1. The Tigris Basin, İstanbul, 185-269. Evans and Renfrew 1968:
  6. J.D. Evans, C. Renfrew, Excavations at Saliagos near Antiparos. London. Furness 1956: A. “Furness, Some early pottery of Samos, Kalimnos and Chios”, Proceedings of Prehistoric Society 9: 173-213. Gabrıel 2014: U. Gabriel, “Die keramik der troadischen Funorte Kumtepe IA, Beşik-Sivritepe und Çıplak Köyü im Kontext ihrer überregionalen Vergleic