SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 68 - Sayı: 2

The effects of different storage conditions and periods on mould-yeast,aflatoxin, E. coli and E. coli O157 in wet sugar beet pulp

Yaş şeker pancarı posasında farklı depolama koşulu ve periyodunun küf-maya, aflatoksin, E. coli ve E. coli O157 üzerine etkileri

Pınar TATLI SEVEN
İsmail SEVEN
Ahmet CEYLANER
Nurgül BİRBEN
Kerem KARAKUŞ
Aslıhan Sur ARSLAN
Pages
161–166
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The pH value of the Packaged group was significantly lower than the Non-packaged group at the end of the 1st and 2nd months (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was designed to determine the effects of storage condition and period on mold-yeast, aflatoxin, E. coliand E. coli O157 in the wet sugar beet pulp (WSBP).
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this aim, samples were taken from the first production of WSBP from the sugar factory (Control) and the newly packaged sacks from the packaging company (Packaged Control).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The pH value of the Packaged group was significantly lower than the Non-packaged group at the end of the 1st and 2nd months (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was designed to determine the effects of storage condition and period on mold-yeast, aflatoxin, E. coliand E. coli O157 in the wet sugar beet pulp (WSBP). For this aim, samples were taken from the first production of WSBP from the sugar factory (Control) and the newly packaged sacks from the packaging company (Packaged Control). Afterwards, additional two samples were taken from WSBP stored as packaged (Packaged) and as surrounded by a nylon cover outside near the barn (Nonpackaged) from the predetermined farms with one-month interval. The pH value of the Packaged group was significantly lower than the Non-packaged group at the end of the 1st and 2nd months (P

Özet

Bu araştırma, yaş şeker pancarı posasında (WSBP) küf-maya, aflatoksin, E. coli ve E. coli O157 üzerine depolama koşulu ve süresinin etkilerini belirlemek amacıyla planlanmıştır. Bu amaçla, fabrikadan WSBP’nın ilk üretimi (Kontrol) ve paketleme işletmesinin yeni paketlediği çuvallardan (Paket Kontrol) örnekler alınmıştır. Daha sonra, birer ay aralıklarla önceden belirlenmişçiftliklerden paketlenmiş (Paketlenmiş) ve ahırın yakınında dışarıda bir naylonla çevrili olarak saklanan (Açık) WSBP’ndan iki numune daha alınmıştır. Paketlenmiş grubun pH değeri, 1. ve 2. ayların sonunda açık grubunkilerden önemli derecede daha düşüktü (P

🔖

Cite This Article

SEVEN, P. T., SEVEN, İ., CEYLANER, A., BİRBEN, N., KARAKUŞ, K., ARSLAN, A. S. (2022). The effects of different storage conditions and periods on mould-yeast,aflatoxin, E. coli and E. coli O157 in wet sugar beet pulp. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 68 - Sayı: 2, 161–166. https://ajindex.com/articles/444416

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akkaya MR, Bal MA, Duman AD (2005): Yemlerde ve Yem Hammaddelerinde Görülen Mikotoksinlerin Hayvan Sağlığı Üzerine Etkileri ve Analiz Yöntemleri. 459-462. III. Ulusal Hayvan Besleme Kongresi, Adana, Türkiye
  2. Altaçlı S, Deniz S (2013): The tetermination of in vivo and in vitro digestibility and energy contents of sugar beet pulp silages produced in different ways. Van Vet J, 24, 9-13
  3. Anonymous (2008): ISO 21527-1. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs. Horizontal method for the enumeration of yeasts and moulds (first edition; 2008.07.01). Available at: https://www.sis.se/api/ document/preview/910016/(Accessed June 03, 2020)
  4. Anonymous (2020): Regulation on sampling and analysis methods for official control of feeds. Available at: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2011/12/20111227- 13.htm(Accessed June 03, 2020)
  5. AOAC (2003): International, AOAC Official Method 2003.02
  6. Baran MS, Erkan ME, Vural A (2008): The nutrient values and microbiological quality properties of mixed feeds used in ruminant nutrition in Diyarbakir province. J Fac Vet Med İstanbul Univ, 34, 9-19
  7. Bearson S, Bearson B, Foster JW (1997): Acid stress responses in enterobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 147, 173-180
  8. Bell C (2002): Approach to the control of Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC). Int J Food Microbiol, 78, 197- 216
  9. Buchanan RL, Edelson RL (1999): pH-dependent stationary- phase acid resistance response of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli in the presence of various acidulants. J Food Prot, 62, 211-218
  10. Çerçi İH, Çiftçi M, Güler T, et al (2005): Silolamada Yoncaya Şeker ve Arpaya Alternatif Olarak Pazarlanamayan Elmanın Katılma Olanağının Araştırılması. III. Ulusal Hayvan Besleme Kongresi. Adana, Türkiye
  11. Ceylaner A, Tatli Seven P, Seven I, et al (2020): The effects of two different storage condition and duration on nutrient level and in vitro digestibility of wet sugar beet pulp. FÜ Sağ Bil Vet Derg, 34, 7-12
  12. Coia JE (1998): Clinical, Microbiological and epidemiological aspects of Escherichia coli O157: H7 Infections. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol, 20, 1-9
  13. Erdoğan Z, Aslantaş Ö (2004): A survey on the microbiological quality of mixed feeds and feedstuffs used in Hatay province. Vet Bil Derg, 20, 33-38
  14. Ergün A, Tuncer ŞD, Çolpan İ, et al (2016): Yem Hijyeni ve Teknolojisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Ders Kitabı, Ankara, Türkiye
  15. FAO (2013): Quality assurance for animal feed analysis laboratories.